What's new

HAL Tejas | Updates, News & Discussions-[Thread 2]

More Updates:

1. The supersonic tanks and the 800 ltr tanks are coming up for various tests by the end of the year before actual flight testing.
2. The lowest speed for LCA Mk1 is below the 120 knots that has been put up on that chart. They are regularly flying below that number now. Don't ask further, won't tell.
3. The AUW for the LCA AF Mk2 in that chart is approximately correct.
4. The climb rate of LCA is wrong. Don't ask further, won't tell.
5. The (unrefueled) ferry range is currently not 3000 kms, but they are going to plumb the midboard pylons as well. You are speaking of 4000 ltrs of extra fuel. At that point 3000 kms will be.
6. Note the maximum payload of Mk1. It is not exactly 4000 kg, but pretty close.
7. The uninstalled thrust on Mk1, Mk2 and the Gripen are all wrong.
8. Mk2 is going to +9G capable.

Future looking good :cheers:
 
.
@The Eagle
It's the time to show your efforts as an Administrator.

There are too many complaints for this guy but still you guys didn't take any action against this false flagger. Check out his IP to track his original nationality....

Use report button in such cases without quoting back and move-on. Either a false flag or not, Admin will look into the matter but on first hand, it is necessary to report.

Note to all: No off-topic, self satisfying or irrelevant posts are allowed hence, stay on topic and continue.

Regards,
 
.
Use report button in such cases without quoting back and move-on. Either a false flag or not, Admin will look into the matter but on first hand, it is necessary to report.

Note to all: No off-topic, self satisfying or irrelevant posts are allowed hence, stay on topic and continue.

Regards,
Bro, I reported this guys for more than 10 times but still he is free to troll under PDF hospitality.
Please stick with your mentioned "NOTE" and cleanup the shit littered by that false flagger.
Also edit my last post to its ORIGINAL form because that is an official information, as one of your team-mate modify it as being a Troll.
Remove "and it will be a great news (if achieved)." from my post #3035.
 
.
Also edit my last post to its ORIGINAL form because that is an official information, as one of your team-mate modify it as being a Troll.

No editing found for undermentioned post.

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/hal-orderbook-of-rs-41000-crore-very-low-for-aeronautical-industry/articleshow/60440303.cms

HAL chief claims that HAL will produce 6 more LCAs by end of 2017 and it will be a great news (if achieved).
 
.
More Updates:

1. The supersonic tanks and the 800 ltr tanks are coming up for various tests by the end of the year before actual flight testing.
2. The lowest speed for LCA Mk1 is below the 120 knots that has been put up on that chart. They are regularly flying below that number now. Don't ask further, won't tell.
3. The AUW for the LCA AF Mk2 in that chart is approximately correct.
4. The climb rate of LCA is wrong. Don't ask further, won't tell.
5. The (unrefueled) ferry range is currently not 3000 kms, but they are going to plumb the midboard pylons as well. You are speaking of 4000 ltrs of extra fuel. At that point 3000 kms will be.
6. Note the maximum payload of Mk1. It is not exactly 4000 kg, but pretty close.
7. The uninstalled thrust on Mk1, Mk2 and the Gripen are all wrong.
8. Mk2 is going to +9G capable.
Are we really going for mk2 Tejas
 
. .
Hi to all,

I would like to share short and duly confirmed update:
1. There will be more LCAs for IAF (as speculated earlier) and the Total may cross the line of 200 units.
2. There will be another SE jet, it may either F-16 or Gripen. MoD favors F-16 whereas IAF shows its interest in Gripen. selection will be confirmed soon.
3. More Rafales will be there for sure and the number may cross 150..
4. FGFA is still supported by MoD but no support from IAF (as of now)
5. LCA Mk2 seems to be in Bog which leads to the delay in the project and if it continues project maybe crushed. ( more updates later)
6. For AMCA, The project will not see an significant push until or unless developers test the stealth on 1:1 (full scale) model which is final stages of fabrication.
7. IAF despirately want Safran modified Kaveri Engine on all LCAs.




Are we really going for mk2 Tejas

No editing found for undermentioned post.
The post was moderated by one of your mate and he/she added "and it will be a great news (if achieved)." which is shameless moderation.
post: #3035

along with this, my 2 posts are deleted but the false flaggers' insulting and troll posts are still there.
I do not have any issue with you guys but Admin team have to be non-biased in nature.

proof:
Capture.JPG


Back to the Topic:

Those who would love to know the history of LCA Tejas from the beginning than they should have to watch the video.

Later Updates are continuously shared here...
 
.
The post was moderated by one of your mate and he/she added "and it will be a great news (if achieved)." which is shameless moderation.
post: #3035

along with this, my 2 posts are deleted but the false flaggers' insulting and troll posts are still there.
I do not have any issue with you guys but Admin team have to be non-biased in nature.


First of all, you need to be very ethical as well as respectful while quoting anyone as well as the Admin. So let me repeat again, the post is not edited by any Staff Member/Admin but your own words so do not put your own doing upon others. No such editing found at all but if you want it to be edited just simply ask though, unnecessary blame wouldn't help. No Mod or Admin has such extra time for these kind of unwanted, wasting, worthless activities.

upload_2017-9-14_13-28-23.png



Also, if you have issues, GHQ is the place to discuss as such. Posts are being deleted based upon its worth. Having issues with any other member, such posts or member will be treated as per rules and not as per personal wishlist. Report any post or member that violates Forum Rules. Hopefully, the topic in hand will be continued from now-on.
 
.
First of all, you need to be very ethical as well as respectful while quoting anyone as well as the Admin. So let me repeat again, the post is not edited by any Staff Member/Admin but your own words so do not put your own doing upon others. No such editing found at all but if you want it to be edited just simply ask though, unnecessary blame wouldn't help. No Mod or Admin has such extra time for these kind of unwanted, wasting, worthless activities.

View attachment 425300


Also, if you have issues, GHQ is the place to discuss as such. Posts are being deleted based upon its worth. Having issues with any other member, such posts or member will be treated as per rules and not as per personal wishlist. Report any post or member that violates Forum Rules. Hopefully, the topic in hand will be continued from now-on.
All the case is elaborated by me almost 3 times but still you're unable to understand. There might to some technical issues that is why it is not showing moderation note.
And for the false flagger, personally I reported him for more than 10 times, you may check report history(if you have such level access).
Rest all I clearly experienced biased moderation many times and it is still repeated.
If admin team can't follow their own set of rules than I have no issues.

No need to reply to this post , if you have no valid response.

Good Day
 
.
All the case is elaborated by me almost 3 times but still you're unable to understand. There might to some technical issues that is why it is not showing moderation note.
And for the false flagger, personally I reported him for more than 10 times, you may check report history(if you have such level access).
Rest all I clearly experienced biased moderation many times and it is still repeated.
If admin team can't follow their own set of rules than I have no issues.

No need to reply to this post , if you have no valid response.

Good Day
So naive...

OnTopic: What's your source of information?
 
.
All the case is elaborated by me almost 3 times but still you're unable to understand. There might to some technical issues that is why it is not showing moderation note.

Every issue is checked accordingly and there is no such editing except it is your own post.
Reporting a false flagger is like you have done your part so much appreciated. Admin will look into as such.

No further off-topic post.
 
. . . . .
Back
Top Bottom