What's new

HAL Tejas | Updates, News & Discussions-[Thread 2]

DYLdEGRX4AIlhz-.jpg


sp8
 
. .
BC!!! here you go for Tejas MK-II on Roll.

https://www.stratpost.com/drdo-asks-for-lca-mk2-funding/

DRDO asks for LCA Mk2 funding
IAF 'committed' to 201 LCA Mk2 fighters

by Saurabh Joshi • March 14, 2018

The Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) has asked the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Defence for additional funds to develop the Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) Mk2.

In submissions made to the committee, Secretary, Defence Research and Development and Chairman, DRDO, S. Christopher mentioned a request of INR 800 crore for work on the LCA Mk2, also, saying the Indian Air Force (IAF) had committed itself to 201 LCA Mk2, in addition to the 123 LCA Mk1/1A or order or being contemplated at the moment. The naval LCA was also intended to be based on the LCA Mk2.

The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Defence cited his remarks in a report released on Tuesday, in which he was quoted as saying, “We have LCA Programme which is coming under grants-in-aid which requires funding. As of now, we have got the orders for about 123 aircraft and also Air Force is committed to take another 201 aircraft which means, Mark-II to be designed and developed, we are in the half way through. There are some expenditures involved. We request another Rs.800 Crore under grants-in-aid. If it could be provided we will be happy.”

Christopher had made a reference to an IAF commitment for 201 LCA Mk2 earlier this month, as well. The Indian Express quoted him as saying in Ahmedabad, “In addition to that (123 LCA Mk1/1A order), the air force has given in writing another 201 aircraft, which is the next version, that we call as Mark-II. We are working on it and by 2022 it will be flying.”

These remarks come during a period of confusion about the intention of the defence ministry and IAF with respect to acquisition of fighter aircraft. After the withdrawal of the IAF tender for 126 Medium Multi Role Combat Aircraft (MMRCA) in 2015 and the order for 36 Rafale fighter aircraft, the defence ministry under Manohar Parrikar announced its intention to hold a competition for a Make in India single-engine fighter aircraft.

Fighters were also listed as one of four domestic manufacturing priorities in Chapter 07 of the Defence Procurement Procedure (DPP) on strategic partnerships, released last year.

More recently, reports have emerged suggesting that the defence ministry under Nirmala Sitharaman might be open to throwing the competition open to all manufacturers and fighters, to include twin-engine aircraft, as well.

At the same time, while there is talk of IAF interest in the U.S. fifth generation F-35, the French have also urged India towards a repeat government-to-government order for Rafale fighters.

The IAF’s current order numbers for the LCA:

  • LCA Mk1 (IOC standard): 20
  • LCA Mk1 (FOC standard): 20
  • LCA Mk1A: 83
IOC refers to Initial Operational Clearance; the existing standard of the aircraft, which includes a number of waivers of Staff Qualitative Requirements (SQRs). FOC refers to Final Operational Clearance, which is the next objective for the aircraft; to demonstrate an enhanced capability to meet additional SQRs, including air-to-air refueling, and integration with the Derby and Python missiles. The LCA Mk1A includes four specific capability improvements prescribed by the IAF. These include:


  • Digital RWR and External SPJ Pod
  • Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) Radar
  • Combined Interrogator and Transponder (CIT)
  • ASRAM – Close Combat Missile
  • Beyond Visual Range (BVR) Missile
Although the defence ministry has approved the acquisition of 83 LCA Mk1A, no order has been placed yet.

The LCA Mk2 requires a more powerful engine than the the current GE F404 powering the LCA Mk1. The GE F414 had been selected for the LCA Mk2. However, there is now speculation a revived indigenous Kaveri engine could power the aircraft with French assistance. This is not the first time such an idea has been considered.

Either way, any engine upgrade would likely require significant changes to the existing airframe. In recent years, both the IAF and the navy had dropped the idea of pursuing an LCA Mk2 model from active consideration.

On its part, the committee recommended the extra cash for the LCA Mk2, but said, “The Committee, while examining the Demands for Grants, discovered that delays in completion of projects is a part and parcel of DRDOs functioning. For instance, Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) was supposed to be completed in 2008 but the revised date of completion is June, 2019. In the case of Aero engine, Kaveri, the original date of completion was 1996 but was revised to December, 2009. Further revision of the completion schedule continues to be under process. Similar is the case with LCA-Navy, Airborne Early Warning and Control (AEW&C) System, Air to Air Missile system-Astra, Long Range Surface to Air Missile etc. to name a few.”
 
. . . . .
This Facebook post is no longer available. It may have been removed or the privacy settings of the post may have changed.
 
. . . . .
Really? That was worth a thread by itself?
Wow, can't wait for this title then :

LCA Tejas SP-läkh successfully completes first flight
24th March 2398


A bit much but good day, Tay.
I agree. These threads should be stopped at some point. But hey, we've worse threads. So let some of us have fun by blacking the faces of our own people who claims production rate is low.

its painted ? first flight should be in yellow raw body as we know ?
That's for representation.
Here's SP8 for better representation:
28701029_1692418574185917_2445434868507427669_o.jpg
 
.
I agree. These threads should be stopped at some point. But hey, we've worse threads. So let some of us have fun by blacking the faces of our own people who claims production rate is low.


That's for representation.
Here's SP8 for better representation:
View attachment 461463
No no bro SP-9 should be build from premiere like this
FOREIGN201603251017000175732193215.jpg
and letter be painted
 
.
It should not be a thread, but looking at the first page of new post we won't find any defence related thread though this is a defence forum.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom