I am not sure what you want me to respond to.
First, our engineers were locked out of the Lockheed Martin offices overnight, once the embargo was imposed; they were not allowed even to retrieve their own notes and workings.
It is possible that, being competent engineers, they recalled the broad outlines of what they had been doing, reaped the benefit of eliminating blind alleys in their previous work (always happens in a development project that the second time around, one goes straight to the mark), and wrote better control laws.
As far as scoffing about claims made, claims are just claims, and so, too, scoffing is just scoffing: both are irrelevant displays born out of an inferiority complex.
As far as the analysis of the current state of play within Pakistan is concerned, two comments are possible:
- In the science-hostile environment that is rapidly coming to a head in Pakistan, very little progress can be expected;
- In emulating the blind prejudice of our neighbours and their vulnerability to religious rage, we are doing no better and already the effects are showing up.
Nothing much to choose between the two failing states.
This is not entirely correct. HCL picked up key people from my team after I had left, people whom I had procured salaries better than my own, and what these people were doing in our organisation was not testing work.
For instance, the control laws for one of the key ISRO launch vehicles was worked out by us; this was the first and last time ISRO outsourced this kind of work, and the ISRO chief who took over soon after this (a well-known and publicity-loving figure) made sure we got nothing from them. However, we had the capability and exercised it successfully in a number of projects that obviously may not be mentioned.
We did do a lot of testing, as it happens. One well-fed cash cow was the testing of Ada based software for Westinghouse, developed by our clients, and tested entirely by us; our certification was accepted by the end-client. That does not mean that we had no other work.