Well tell this to your fellow Pakistanis, who was threatening that large number JUD supporters in US will now act to teach a lesson, for the bounty being placed on head of HS..
i dont know who said it, but i wouldnt endorse that statement simply because ''teaching lessons'' on soft targets sounds like a dangerous and unfeasible approach to the subject and gives Pakistan (or Pakistanis) a tarnished name which no patriotic Pakistani would want.
i was quite vocal in my condemnation during and immediately after the 26/11 terrorist attacks as well, let that be known...my heart goes out to the victims' families in Mumbai as much as they go out to victims in Kashmir who face daily difficulties and hardships as a direct result of AFSPA and other iron-fist measures that have suppressed them for so long.
as for HS inner our outer or perpendicular circles -- sure some of them are hate-inciting bigots who have hardly even received a formal education (HS actually does come from a reasonably well-educated background, interestingly enough).
look at what HS is a product of
--he witnessed 36 members of his family being murdered by individuals today living freely in india...anyone who lived around the time of partition had similar stories....he was no exception.
-- he received much largesse from the americans when he was working for maktab al khidmaat; in those days the focus was against the soviets....Kashmir issue existed but was on back-burner (similar to what it seems to be today -- given the lack of vision of our leaders)......emboldened by the victory against the soviets, it is indeed true that some of the forces were re-routed against indian security establishment 'interests' in occupied J&K.
this was never an issue of contention for the US until relatively recently, as US-Pak ties have slowly nose-dived
once again --> provide proof of HS involvement in terrorist activity; the terrorism charges are what have landed the bounty on him
what i find perplexing is that the Americans put this bounty (as per their official claim) in the interests of securing proof that would lead to a conviction......it's almost as if they are saying ''we dont have the proof.....but just come up with something and we'll pay you for it''