What's new

Gujarat: Pack of Hindus attack Muslim laborer with knives for refusing to shriek "Jai Shri Ram:

So you are agreeing that all your childish claims of 'muslim brotherhood' and ummah chumma ideologies were piece of dustbin that you really don't care and was selfish and made a decision of Parition solely for the benefit of fuedal lords and british raj / ex-royal army (Pakistan military). There was nothing sincere about muslims overall as muslims were the only people who were being divided in this whole process.

BTW, 'fault of indian muslims' LMAO! They are really happy to stayed behind. In a country with over a billion population such few violent events don't even count. So many well established indian muslims I know in all over the UK and the middleast. They will only laugh at your concepts. I had the same mentality when I was too young but reality checked in really loud and quick.


We are ready to arm and provide moral support.

Pakistan is small nation. There is no way Pakistan could have afforded more million Muslims. The only solution is Greater Pakistan meaning more portion of India in order to protect Muslims.

Today it is too late to accept them but my point was that they had an option to immigrate in 1947 which they failed to avail.
 
.
Who could rape & murder you when you are equal in population and no more a minority ?
Kashmiri Muslims were an ABSOLUTE MAJORITY in Kashmir and that didn't stop Sikhs and Dogras from carrying out MULTIPLE campaigns of ethnic cleansing and genocide against them. Sorry, it's not childish thinking to learn from historical facts!

nd as I explained earlier had there be no partition the very basis of hatred would not have present.
False, there were hundreds of riots prior to partition and nationwide campaigns to boycott Muslims, their business and their festivals, all spearheaded by Congress leaders.
Tilak refashioned one of their festivals because he didn't like Hindus participating in Muharram:

1696190319288.png


1696190341218.png


Why our ancestors were able to live for 1000s of years together?
They didn't? My ancestors didn't live alongside violent, riotous BIMARU mutts. And there was little rapport between Muslims and Sikhs / Hindus in places like Punjab - we were seen as untouchable:
1696190580644.png


It man-made borders made on political objectives for fuedals and royal army
So is Bharat.
 
.
Are you an Indian pretending to be a Pakistani. lol?

All Pakistanis are grateful for partition. Show your true colours Indiot. Or too ashamed to show your true nationality?

Technically I am not a Pakistani anymore. Never renewed my Pakistani passport for years. I am Pakistani by birth and give a damn if anyone think I am not because of my rational thinking.

Being Pakistani does not mean, we close our eyes on truth and see history with a brainwashed mind. I never said, Pakistan should merge back in india. I said Pakistan is a reality and we must work to make it a progressive country. A country that should be strong but more importantly a welfare state for its people. Clearly that has not happened a bit in last 75 years. A failed idea that is proven by constant military barbaric rule. Its an extension of british colonism. There are other primary reasons why partition was a mistake in my view as it only divided the muslims of sub-continent. 25 crore in Pakistan, 20-25 crore in Bangladesh, 20-25 crore in India. This would have been world's largest muslim country and would have been automatically closer to muslim world.

Think of the unlimited amount of energies both countries have spent against each other (ISI and RAW, the terrorisms, the wars). The partition which laid the biggest foundation of hatred between two nation, just remove all that and you see a true world power. Muslims would have been much more powerful and happier had there be no paritition. No kashmir issue and even a powerful united india with majority muslims would have intervened and helped solved Palestine issue as well. I am just talking from 'muslims angle' there are more and more solid arguments can be given.
 
.
Kashmiri Muslims were an ABSOLUTE MAJORITY in Kashmir and that didn't stop Sikhs and Dogras from carrying out MULTIPLE campaigns of ethnic cleansing and genocide against them. Sorry, it's not childish thinking to learn from historical facts!

That's a wrong example. You must consider only those events that happened either before start of british raj (1700s) or after departure of british raj. The whole approach of british was divide and conquer and they fuel such clashes at first place so populace remain busy cutting each other throats and no one challenge the masters themselves. If you are talking about events after 1947 then Whatever campaigns against Kashmiris are done are sponsored by the indian state (which is majorly hindu thanks to partition only). Had there be equal number of muslims in india then the govt could never have even imagined carrying out or supporting campaigns against muslims.

The kashmir issue would not have even existed. Its existing only because of the partition. No wars and no kashmir would have been divided, whole of kashmir would have been together. Its unthinkable to think of kashmir as an issue had there be no paritition at first place.

Today unfortunately:
Muslims in Pakistan can carry out attacks against hindus worship places (because hindus are in minority)
Hindus in India can carry out attacks against mosques (because muslims are in minority)

When you have equal numbers then you get rid of problems like oppression against minorities - as there's no more a minority group. You get representatives from both religious groups in parliament and govt. and more importantly this narrow thinking of analyzing things only basis of beliefs would not have mattered then so much, because the state would have grown and evolved knowing the fact that there are two large groups in the country.
 
.
The whole approach of british was divide and conquer and they fuel such clashes at first place so populace remain busy cutting each other throats and no one challenge the masters themselves.
There is no evidence of this. Congress leaders were the ones behind this accusation and now we know there were senior leaders amongst them like Vallabhbhai Patel who were anti-Muslim Hindu nationalists.
The kashmir issue would not have even existed. Its existing only because of the partition. No wars and no kashmir would have been divided, whole of kashmir would have been together. Its unthinkable to think of kashmir as an issue had there be no paritition at first place.
No, this is false. The Kashmir issue dates further back - Hindu Congressmen were defending the Dogra tyrant murdering and oppressing his Muslim subjects when the British still ruled.

When you have equal numbers then you get rid of problems like oppression against minorities - as there's no more a minority group. You get representatives from both religious groups in parliament and govt. and more importantly this narrow thinking of analyzing things only basis of beliefs would not have mattered then so much, because the state would have grown and evolved knowing the fact that there are two large groups in the country.
What you're basically admitting is that there is no chance of co-existence between Hindus - you are very well aware Hindus are ruthless and violent enough to go after us as a minority so the only way to live alongside with them is with equal numbers to threaten them enough not to do anything against us. Sorry, not buying this argument.
 
.
Technically I am not a Pakistani anymore. Never renewed my Pakistani passport for years. I am Pakistani by birth and give a damn if anyone think I am not because of my rational thinking.

Being Pakistani does not mean, we close our eyes on truth and see history with a brainwashed mind. I never said, Pakistan should merge back in india. I said Pakistan is a reality and we must work to make it a progressive country. A country that should be strong but more importantly a welfare state for its people. Clearly that has not happened a bit in last 75 years. A failed idea that is proven by constant military barbaric rule. Its an extension of british colonism. There are other primary reasons why partition was a mistake in my view as it only divided the muslims of sub-continent. 25 crore in Pakistan, 20-25 crore in Bangladesh, 20-25 crore in India. This would have been world's largest muslim country and would have been automatically closer to muslim world.

Think of the unlimited amount of energies both countries have spent against each other (ISI and RAW, the terrorisms, the wars). The partition which laid the biggest foundation of hatred between two nation, just remove all that and you see a true world power. Muslims would have been much more powerful and happier had there be no paritition. No kashmir issue and even a powerful united india with majority muslims would have intervened and helped solved Palestine issue as well. I am just talking from 'muslims angle' there are more and more solid arguments can be given.
Listen Indiot, I do not have time for bullshit.

Muslims still would have been a minority of 25-33% in a United South Asia from Peshawar to Chittagong.

Partition was right, to preserve Muslim culture and identity.

Sorry, but why confuse the new generations of Pakistanis? Pakistan was created to preserve Muslim identity and culture. Not buying your stupid argument.

Indian National Congress were not giving the reserved seats for Muslims. So we should live under the domination of Hindus who make 67-73% of India?

You sir are a moron! :enjoy:

Technically I am not a Pakistani anymore. Never renewed my Pakistani passport for years. I am Pakistani by birth and give a damn if anyone think I am not because of my rational thinking.

Being Pakistani does not mean, we close our eyes on truth and see history with a brainwashed mind. I never said, Pakistan should merge back in india. I said Pakistan is a reality and we must work to make it a progressive country. A country that should be strong but more importantly a welfare state for its people. Clearly that has not happened a bit in last 75 years. A failed idea that is proven by constant military barbaric rule. Its an extension of british colonism. There are other primary reasons why partition was a mistake in my view as it only divided the muslims of sub-continent. 25 crore in Pakistan, 20-25 crore in Bangladesh, 20-25 crore in India. This would have been world's largest muslim country and would have been automatically closer to muslim world.

Think of the unlimited amount of energies both countries have spent against each other (ISI and RAW, the terrorisms, the wars). The partition which laid the biggest foundation of hatred between two nation, just remove all that and you see a true world power. Muslims would have been much more powerful and happier had there be no paritition. No kashmir issue and even a powerful united india with majority muslims would have intervened and helped solved Palestine issue as well. I am just talking from 'muslims angle' there are more and more solid arguments can be given.
For a person who doesn't consider himself a Pakistani, or who is not declared to be a Muslim, I do not know if you are a Muslim? Then what are you doing on a Pakistani forum then? And then you say to 250 million Pakistanis that partition was wrong? lol?

Are you buffoon or what?
 
Last edited:
.
No need to post such things if we can't help them or the ones under severe oppression inside Pakistan.

Muslims of india would have been much stronger, had muslims of Pakistan and Bangladesh would be with them. There would have been 70 crore muslims nearly the same as hindus in united india. So everytime we post the thread that muslims are being targeted in india then we are actually telling that we did it to them. Division of india was basically division of muslims. Only muslims were weakened (if seeing only from religion pov) . Hindus remained majorly in one country.

The Deobandi ullema made this argument.

Kashmiri Muslims were an ABSOLUTE MAJORITY in Kashmir and that didn't stop Sikhs and Dogras from carrying out MULTIPLE campaigns of ethnic cleansing and genocide against them. Sorry, it's not childish thinking to learn from historical facts!

Not to mention, I've also heard that Afghan rule in Kashmir was brutal. The only evidence I've seen for this is from Dindu articles and sources so I'm skeptical. Obviously Kashmiri Muslims are going to hyper focus on Dogra rule since they are the sole cause of whats happening today.

I am just talking from 'muslims angle' there are more and more solid arguments can be given.

Those arguments can be made for places where Muslims were either in plurality or minority, but it doesn't really apply to the British provinces of NWFP and Balochistan, since those places were overwhelmingly majority Muslim.

made a decision of Parition solely for the benefit of fuedal lords and british raj / ex-royal army (Pakistan military).

Agree, but you have to realize Pakistan was made with help of feudal lords and handed everything to it on a silver platter by the British.

That's why it'll always be at a disadvantage on a foundational level. It wasn't a country united event like Algeria or Ireland where everyone had a role to play and shed blood. In Pakistan's case, everyone didn't shed blood for Pakistan, a lot of people (including my own) just became Pakistani overnight.
 
Last edited:
.
Not to mention, I've also heard that Afghan rule in Kashmir was brutal. The only evidence I've seen for this is from Dindu articles and sources so I'm skeptical. Obviously Kashmiri Muslims are going to hyper focus on Dogra rule since they are the sole cause of whats happening today.
It's true but it was the Kashmiri Muslim majority which suffered at the hands of the Afghans. Randits only do RR over this period because it wasn't them driving the Kashmiri Muslim peasantry to starvation with excessive taxation and oppression.
 
.
No need to post such things if we can't help them or the ones under severe oppression inside Pakistan.

Muslims of india would have been much stronger, had muslims of Pakistan and Bangladesh would be with them. There would have been 70 crore muslims nearly the same as hindus in united india. So everytime we post the thread that muslims are being targeted in india then we are actually telling that we did it to them. Division of india was basically division of muslims. Only muslims were weakened (if seeing only from religion pov) . Hindus remained majorly in one country.
You are implying that partition favored hindus but hindus claim otherwise.
Having equal numbers in one country is not the solution, what if one groups polulation declines? We will be back to the same problem.
There is no end to this issue other than separate states for Muslims and hindus.

I find Indian hindu logic stupid in this sense that their actions are giving weight to two nation theory but they don't want two nations.
 
.
Incorrect, who would have dared to do such things when muslim population would not have been a minority anymore but at equal level.

Secondly, this bogus & childish concept has no basis at all which every child in Pakistan including my early years were fed with. Partition was just politics and not a wise move. Though it happened now, so it cannot be undone. Pakistan is a reality and we must work towards betterment of it starting from laying proper foundation for democracy and putting a leash around our military establishment's neck. They must work under constitutional boundary.

Muslims and hindus lived together in sub-continent for 1000s of years together. There was never that much hatred, british colonial history is known for divide and conquer. They exploited it and at the time of freedom this idea was strengthened and supported by british as divided countries will be easier to manage remotely.

The real basis of hatred and extremism was laid on the partition itself. When millions were moved from one place to other. From both ends there was severe violence and killings and lootings. This led to reasons for major hatred. Had there be no partition, the most reasons of hatred would not have even been present.

The bloody partition happened, so now for how long two countries and two extremist populations in both countries will keep hating each other and remain enemies ? Is this the sole purpose of your life that If you are born at this side of border (man made border) then you keep abusing the people at other side of border. Remember its none of your contribution where you are supposed to be born. You could have born at other side of LOC and abusing Pakistanis at the moment. So human being must think beyond what kings and politicians have taught them for their own benefits. Stop being puppets and think rationally.

No bruv your either confused or mistaken or willfully retarded

Muslims and Hindus did not live in peace for a thousand years

Hundreds of millions or at least millions of hindus were slaughtered over waves of Muslims invasions until the Hindus were broken and their kings fell to their knees and gave their princesses as tribute, their most historical and religious sites were decimated.

Peace if their was any was enforced at the point of a sword or barrel of a gun

There were countless slaughters, conflicts and riots



Partition was ESSENTIAL because Jinnah foresaw what was going to happen, and you two massive populations with differing views of history, neither able or willing to back down


He say the mental baggage the Hindus were carrying after 1000 years of defeat and humiliation, he understood that in a land where they formed the majority they would seek to Hinduize the state and it would be at the cost of the Indian Muslims who would resist and their would be inevitable conflict if not outright civil war



The slaughter of Partition was just the beginning






Look at Indian Muslims today countless riots and humiliation,, a state that is ERASING their history and place names. A education system which more or less erases Indian Muslims history and culture a constant barrage of Hindu crap from Parliament to school books to T.V


Indian Muslims have no state, no government, no military, no political party to represent them



A few fucking dopes be becoming rich in a sea of despair means nothing

Their only strength is 200+ million population and strength of faith to keep their community strong and teach their children their history, faith and values


Let me be clear

INDIAN MUSLIMS DESERVE THEIR FATE, they had a choice, they could have pushed for freedom of their own areas (they still can)
The sikhs are the same, Jinnah told them clearly that either you gain independence or you will be swamped




Pakistan for the majority of the last 75 years was ahead of India and south of India most indexes, and we need to get back a solid 10-15 years of development will do it,, but we have a worthlessness corrupt political system to overcome

But independence is far far better then being stuck in purgatory alongside a a Hindu enemy
 
.
Government of Pakistan must send the cricket team present near Gujarat to visit this man and help lift his spirits.
 
.
Incorrect, who would have dared to do such things when muslim population would not have been a minority anymore but at equal level.

Secondly, this bogus & childish concept has no basis at all which every child in Pakistan including my early years were fed with. Partition was just politics and not a wise move. Though it happened now, so it cannot be undone. Pakistan is a reality and we must work towards betterment of it starting from laying proper foundation for democracy and putting a leash around our military establishment's neck. They must work under constitutional boundary.

Muslims and hindus lived together in sub-continent for 1000s of years together. There was never that much hatred, british colonial history is known for divide and conquer. They exploited it and at the time of freedom this idea was strengthened and supported by british as divided countries will be easier to manage remotely.

The real basis of hatred and extremism was laid on the partition itself. When millions were moved from one place to other. From both ends there was severe violence and killings and lootings. This led to reasons for major hatred. Had there be no partition, the most reasons of hatred would not have even been present.

The bloody partition happened, so now for how long two countries and two extremist populations in both countries will keep hating each other and remain enemies ? Is this the sole purpose of your life that If you are born at this side of border (man made border) then you keep abusing the people at other side of border. Remember its none of your contribution where you are supposed to be born. You could have born at other side of LOC and abusing Pakistanis at the moment. So human being must think beyond what kings and politicians have taught them for their own benefits. Stop being puppets and think rationally.

Clearly you didn't read must history. Do you realise that such acts were commonly happening pre-partition and was a huge driving factor behind Quaid-e-azam supporting the creation of a new nation?
 
.
Technically I am not a Pakistani anymore. Never renewed my Pakistani passport for years. I am Pakistani by birth and give a damn if anyone think I am not because of my rational thinking.

Being Pakistani does not mean, we close our eyes on truth and see history with a brainwashed mind. I never said, Pakistan should merge back in india. I said Pakistan is a reality and we must work to make it a progressive country. A country that should be strong but more importantly a welfare state for its people. Clearly that has not happened a bit in last 75 years. A failed idea that is proven by constant military barbaric rule. Its an extension of british colonism. There are other primary reasons why partition was a mistake in my view as it only divided the muslims of sub-continent. 25 crore in Pakistan, 20-25 crore in Bangladesh, 20-25 crore in India. This would have been world's largest muslim country and would have been automatically closer to muslim world.

Think of the unlimited amount of energies both countries have spent against each other (ISI and RAW, the terrorisms, the wars). The partition which laid the biggest foundation of hatred between two nation, just remove all that and you see a true world power. Muslims would have been much more powerful and happier had there be no paritition. No kashmir issue and even a powerful united india with majority muslims would have intervened and helped solved Palestine issue as well. I am just talking from 'muslims angle' there are more and more solid arguments can be given.

Very heart touching but you forget a very simple fact that Muslims never saw themselves as a singular nation within many nations found in geographical India likewise the 'Hindus'. There were thousands of princely states and the very concept of a singular Indian identity was abhorrent if not blasphemous in some cases.

Jinnah was not the ideological founder of the political Muslim identity in British India. It was laid out by Sir Syed, romanticized by Iqbal and enabled by Jinnah through democratic principles.

British administrators were solely responsible for the bloodshed related to partition of British India made along the lines of a Muslim Pakistan and a secular India, not Hindu India.
 
.
There would have been 70 crore muslims nearly the same as hindus in united india.

60 crore Muslims without political power and ruled by a Hindu majority who outnumber them 2 to 1 means 60 crore victims instead of 20 crore victims as it is now.

You are either delusional, or a poopjeet.
 
.
Listen Indiot, I do not have time for bullshit.

Muslims still would have been a minority of 25-33% in a United South Asia from Peshawar to Chittagong.

Partition was right, to preserve Muslim culture and identity.

Sorry, but why confuse the new generations of Pakistanis? Pakistan was created to preserve Muslim identity and culture. Not buying your stupid argument.

Indian National Congress were not giving the reserved seats for Muslims. So we should live under the domination of Hindus who make 67-73% of India?

You sir are a moron! :enjoy:


For a person who doesn't consider himself a Pakistani, or who is not declared to be a Muslim, I do not know if you are a Muslim? Then what are you doing on a Pakistani forum then? And then you say to 250 million Pakistanis that partition was wrong? lol?

Are you buffoon or what?

No bruv your either confused or mistaken or willfully retarded

Muslims and Hindus did not live in peace for a thousand years

Hundreds of millions or at least millions of hindus were slaughtered over waves of Muslims invasions until the Hindus were broken and their kings fell to their knees and gave their princesses as tribute, their most historical and religious sites were decimated.

Peace if their was any was enforced at the point of a sword or barrel of a gun

There were countless slaughters, conflicts and riots



Partition was ESSENTIAL because Jinnah foresaw what was going to happen, and you two massive populations with differing views of history, neither able or willing to back down


He say the mental baggage the Hindus were carrying after 1000 years of defeat and humiliation, he understood that in a land where they formed the majority they would seek to Hinduize the state and it would be at the cost of the Indian Muslims who would resist and their would be inevitable conflict if not outright civil war



The slaughter of Partition was just the beginning






Look at Indian Muslims today countless riots and humiliation,, a state that is ERASING their history and place names. A education system which more or less erases Indian Muslims history and culture a constant barrage of Hindu crap from Parliament to school books to T.V


Indian Muslims have no state, no government, no military, no political party to represent them



A few fucking dopes be becoming rich in a sea of despair means nothing

Their only strength is 200+ million population and strength of faith to keep their community strong and teach their children their history, faith and values


Let me be clear

INDIAN MUSLIMS DESERVE THEIR FATE, they had a choice, they could have pushed for freedom of their own areas (they still can)
The sikhs are the same, Jinnah told them clearly that either you gain independence or you will be swamped




Pakistan for the majority of the last 75 years was ahead of India and south of India most indexes, and we need to get back a solid 10-15 years of development will do it,, but we have a worthlessness corrupt political system to overcome

But independence is far far better then being stuck in purgatory alongside a a Hindu enemy

Clearly you didn't read must history. Do you realise that such acts were commonly happening pre-partition and was a huge driving factor behind Quaid-e-azam supporting the creation of a new nation?

60 crore Muslims without political power and ruled by a Hindu majority who outnumber them 2 to 1 means 60 crore victims instead of 20 crore victims as it is now.

You are either delusional, or a poopjeet.

Kind of bias and childish logic is alarming. You guys speaking like a super brainwashed people without using a single brain cell of your own. Only thing you can say is 'oh you are not a pakistani' LMAO! This is height of your ignorance and acceptance of your defeat by not making a logical point and accusing another person to be HINDU or INDIAN. I also accuse Abdul Majeed khan as disguised pakistani as indian but never knew myself will be accused just because extremists have almost zero capability to listen the arguments from any other person.

No wonder, why Pakistan is in a state that it is now. No capability to listen to arguments and start accusing other with pack of lies. It is disgusting to be honest.

Your absolutely zero logic and only accusations is a proof itself that division was a mistake. You have developed into two extremist states with zero tolerance level. Such narrow / bias views tch tch. What is exactly the difference between you and an RSS goon, When you fails to argue and resorts to accusation and start calling other person as indian. You doing exactly the same. and this proves all my points again that what a failed idea it was to create two extremist nations based on bloody partition and continued hatred. Human society bounded by such hate for another humans just because of their faiths is disgusting. Its laughable that you people think yourselves as perhaps good muslims. What kind of muslim will accuse another because of his different views on the concept which weakened muslims at first place.

The argument that some pre-partition riots happened - yes happened towards end of british raj - the whole approach of british was divide & conquer. There wasn't that much of an issue before british arrival. The riots only started in much frequency when a specific group of people started talking about separate land. Parition was massive political mistake for muslims. They were thinking a HUGE piece of land almost half of india as muslims and other half as hindus. But that NEVER happened, you got very small land comparatively and that too at both ends separated by a hindu state. It was terrible geographic with 1000s of KM between two ends. Ultimately Bengalis giving two F--ks to whole Concept and ultimately creation of Bangladesh. Only Kids can talk as you people are talking. Intellectuals like Molana Abdul Kalam Azad and various muslims were absolutely right that in short term for few years this concept of parition may appease but at the lense of history in 100s of years it will become obvious that it was a mistake. That has 100% become obvious by the way you people are reacting, the way you have developed intolerance because solely of partition, the way you guys have developed a narrow / bias and hatred filled mentality thats a shame for any human society. Another obvious failure of Pakistan as a failed state. It was promised to be a welfare state. Entire 75 years is filled with military barbaric dictatorship and fuedal lords over poors in Sindh & lower Punjab. The country is literally drowning in debts and there is no way out. Even Today it is practically as marshal law, the most patriotic leadership is in jails, the patriotic journalists are either killed or tortured. BTW, same story is happening continously for 75 years in tribal areas and Balochistan. And you guys are arguying that bloody parition was right ? Sectarian violence, 80,000+ dead in recent 15 years in war on terror Where the terrorists are also so-called muslims, they blew themselves up saying Allah o Akbar, obviously they are not doing any service to Islam but those suicide bombers are illiterate they think they are doing it for Islam, they are illiterate and brainwashed just like you folks.

Giving pathetic accuses that oh see whats happening in india today to muslims. LMAO! First of all such few events in a country with over a billion population cannot be counted at all. Chances of this to be done to a single person is one in literally million years. Secondly, WHO the F--k would have done this to you if you were to be in power and in numbers. Use your god damn little brains. Atleast try to use a single cell of out of it. It's pretty common sense that with 70 crore muslims you would have made a huge part of government. United india would have been a leader of entire muslim world. It was Ummah in real sense Not a selfish, narrow thinking that oh its 20 crore indian muslims fault lmao. At one end you guys claim to be ummah chummah and other end you F--k up 20 crore muslims and discard them and act completely selfish. No one with muslim

Partition was only division of muslims. It weakend muslims to a lot degree. A big chunk left in India, Big chunk in Pakistan, Big Chunk in Bangladesh, and one big, powerful country with majority hindus to bully the small new country.

Try to think bigger, try to think of history not from few riots point of view but from larger perspective, see implications of this decision in 100s of years, Try to open your minds.

Try to think on energies spent against each other for 75+ years, the bloody wars, the full efforts to destablize each other, ISI, RAW, the kashmir issue, the bloody partition, the riots that erupted when this movement for parition started - all that could have been avoided and you see a world power. Despite consuming so much effort on Pakistan, india still has become world's 5th largest economy and a space power, Pakistan became nuclear power but sadly nothing else - Together with unity they would have been at top of world. Your concepts would have been different. You would have grown matured, with your own intellectual thinking. Not the one which was fed to you in your childhood. One of reasons why indians are dominating the tech world, becoming world leaders both politically and technically around the world is that their education is objective and conceptual. Unlike the way which we were taught. If we don't realize our mistakes we will never progress.

Saying all that - I know above is too much for you to consume. Pakistan is created now. Pakistan is a reality. It cannot be undone. Now we must try to change our thinkings, We must try to remove our unneccassry hatred. If BJP / RSS are extremists, we don't have to follow their examples. We have tons of problems of our own. If 75 years were a failture, our only option now is to imrpove our future and that will be done by accepting our mistakes and learning from mistakes. We must improve our education sector, we must do massive reforms in it. We must do reforms in military too so it becomes a force that always work under its consittutional boundary. A state can only last if there's regard of law in it. and lastly and most importantly if we have to succeed ever in life then we must develop the guts to listen to others and must develop ability to listen to new ideas and out of box thinking. We must develop tolerance. Extremist behavious will see us our doom. Thank you
 
.
Back
Top Bottom