What's new

Guess who won an Indian contract in Chabahar? the Chinese

Han Patriot

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Mar 23, 2011
Messages
13,535
Reaction score
-36
Country
China
Location
Singapore
MUMBAI, AUGUST 11:


New Delhi and Beijing may be in the middle of a bitter standoff on the Sino-Indian border, but it is a Chinese company banned in India that has won the contract to supply cranes to Iran’s Chabahar port.

The port, on Iran’s south-eastern coast, is being developed by India as a counter to China’s involvement in Pakistan’s Gwadar port.

The contract was awarded by Indian Ports Global — a 60:40 joint venture of Jawaharlal Nehru Port, India’s biggest container port, and Kandla Port — that is tasked with developing the Chabahar facility.

“The crane supply contract has been given to ZPMC,” a Shipping Ministry official said, referring to the world’s largest port crane maker, which has been barred by security agencies from supplying to Indian ports.

ZPMC, which has a 70 per cent share of the global quay crane market, won the ₹380-crore order through an auction. The contract comes in the backdrop of Indian and Chinese soldiers locked in an eyeball-to-eyeball confrontation at the trijunction of the India-Bhutan-China border.



“China’s enormous investment in China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) and port infrastructure in the Indian Ocean, serves much more than trade. It advances Beijing’s ‘String of Pearls’ strategy, as well as its unofficial agenda to encircle India through its arch-rival, Pakistan,” wrote Panos Mourdoukoutas, Professor and Chair of the Department of Economics at LIU Post in New York, in a Forbes article.

“India’s involvement in Chabahar has to be looked at from the point of view of China’s One-Belt-One-Road (OBOR) initiative and the CPEC corridor,” said a Mumbai-based port industry official. “China has got a corridor at the top and it has got a corridor at the bottom and they are stringing existing ports onto them,” he said, asking not to be named.

Ties with Teheran
Shipping Minister Gadkari said recently that the Centre was keen on developing Chabahar and hopeful of starting operations by 2018.

Civil construction work has already begun, Gadkari had said after representing India at President Hassan Rouhani’s oath ceremony.

India has allocated ₹600 crore for the development of the port. Of this, tenders worth ₹380 crore for equipment have already been finalised. Gadkari said he was hopeful that the Iranian government would accord certain necessary approvals for expediting the work, adding that the Chabahar Port would boost trade and business between the two countries and in the region.

The port, located in the Sistan-Baluchistan Province on the south-eastern coast, is of great strategic utility for India. It lies outside the Persian Gulf and is accessed from India’s western coast. India is to equip and operate two berths in Chabahar Port Phase-I with capital investment of $85.21 million and annual revenue expenditure of $22.95 million on a 10-year lease.

http://www.thehindubusinessline.com...istan-sri-lanka-hambantota/article9814409.ece
 
.
MUMBAI, AUGUST 11:


New Delhi and Beijing may be in the middle of a bitter standoff on the Sino-Indian border, but it is a Chinese company banned in India that has won the contract to supply cranes to Iran’s Chabahar port.

The port, on Iran’s south-eastern coast, is being developed by India as a counter to China’s involvement in Pakistan’s Gwadar port.

The contract was awarded by Indian Ports Global — a 60:40 joint venture of Jawaharlal Nehru Port, India’s biggest container port, and Kandla Port — that is tasked with developing the Chabahar facility.

“The crane supply contract has been given to ZPMC,” a Shipping Ministry official said, referring to the world’s largest port crane maker, which has been barred by security agencies from supplying to Indian ports.

ZPMC, which has a 70 per cent share of the global quay crane market, won the ₹380-crore order through an auction. The contract comes in the backdrop of Indian and Chinese soldiers locked in an eyeball-to-eyeball confrontation at the trijunction of the India-Bhutan-China border.



“China’s enormous investment in China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) and port infrastructure in the Indian Ocean, serves much more than trade. It advances Beijing’s ‘String of Pearls’ strategy, as well as its unofficial agenda to encircle India through its arch-rival, Pakistan,” wrote Panos Mourdoukoutas, Professor and Chair of the Department of Economics at LIU Post in New York, in a Forbes article.

“India’s involvement in Chabahar has to be looked at from the point of view of China’s One-Belt-One-Road (OBOR) initiative and the CPEC corridor,” said a Mumbai-based port industry official. “China has got a corridor at the top and it has got a corridor at the bottom and they are stringing existing ports onto them,” he said, asking not to be named.

Ties with Teheran
Shipping Minister Gadkari said recently that the Centre was keen on developing Chabahar and hopeful of starting operations by 2018.

Civil construction work has already begun, Gadkari had said after representing India at President Hassan Rouhani’s oath ceremony.

India has allocated ₹600 crore for the development of the port. Of this, tenders worth ₹380 crore for equipment have already been finalised. Gadkari said he was hopeful that the Iranian government would accord certain necessary approvals for expediting the work, adding that the Chabahar Port would boost trade and business between the two countries and in the region.

The port, located in the Sistan-Baluchistan Province on the south-eastern coast, is of great strategic utility for India. It lies outside the Persian Gulf and is accessed from India’s western coast. India is to equip and operate two berths in Chabahar Port Phase-I with capital investment of $85.21 million and annual revenue expenditure of $22.95 million on a 10-year lease.

http://www.thehindubusinessline.com...istan-sri-lanka-hambantota/article9814409.ece

Indians are clowns!!:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

When Indians pay top money, they get top technology and service.

We need more neighbors like that.
 
.
Its all about who has more political, financial maybe to some extent military clout
 
. . .
Its all about who has more political, financial maybe to some extent military clout
Chabahar was postponed for years because of the sanctions and hence India couldn't get European suppliers. Funny how these geniuses are saying this is a 'strategic encirclement port' when they only have one out of 9 berths there. The Iranians are milking them as usual, I wonder if they realize this. The same port was offered to China, now instead of spending billions on that, the Pakistani/Chinese are proposing linking Chabahar to Gwadar with a highway, since Chabahar is not a deep water port, they can access Gwadar when the need arises.
 
.
Chinese have been at loggerheads with Yankees regarding SCS but you still are the largest trading partners and so is the Indo-China trade even though we have been suspicious about each other and had quite a few military stand-offs in the past.

Most countries try not to involve business and trade with rivalry. Most rivalries between countries are created on a fake propaganda especially created by western countries in order to boost their defense exports. A Chinese company getting an Indian contract in Chabahar is nothing to be surprised about
 
Last edited:
.
Chabahar was postponed for years because of the sanctions and hence India couldn't get European suppliers. Funny how these geniuses are saying this is a 'strategic encirclement port' when they only have one out of 9 berths there. The Iranians are milking them as usual, I wonder if they realize this. The same port was offered to China, now instead of spending billions on that, the Pakistani/Chinese are proposing linking Chabahar to Gwadar with a highway, since Chabahar is not a deep water port, they can access Gwadar when the need arises.
India is doing what it needs to get access to Afghanistan and beyond... whereas Gwardar is China's only Option to connect at western sea...India has many posts on its west that are already connected to Western Sea routes..One berth assigned to India does not mean that other berths are out of bounds... if India ships want they can use other berths and pay accordingly.... I lie the way Chinese try to get into semantics and twist the story their way..
 
. .
India is doing what it needs to get access to Afghanistan and beyond... whereas Gwardar is China's only Option to connect at western sea...India has many posts on its west that are already connected to Western Sea routes..One berth assigned to India does not mean that other berths are out of bounds... if India ships want they can use other berths and pay accordingly.... I lie the way Chinese try to get into semantics and twist the story their way..
You would be naive to think Gwadar is for trading. :rofl:. You do know we control and leased Gwadar for 40 years right, while you only leased one berth for 10 years with no operational control.
 
.
Pakistanis should be worried. Their higher than mountain friend is helping arch rival india.

not at all, you would have brought it from some western country. we are happy that China is making some money.
 
.
Pakistanis should be worried. Their higher than mountain friend is helping arch rival india.
What is there to be worried about, you cannot compare Chabahar with Gwadar. Infact there are plans to connect these two ports via a highway. Gwadar will have the capacity to handle 300-400 million tons of cargo each year, a similiar number to the capacity of all of India's ports combined. Chabahar on the other hand will be 10-12 million. You simply cannot compare those two.
 
. .
What is there to be worried about, you cannot compare Chabahar with Gwadar. Infact there are plans to connect these two ports via a highway. Gwadar will have the capacity to handle 300-400 million tons of cargo each year, a similiar number to the capacity of all of India's ports combined. Chabahar on the other hand will be 10-12 million. You simply cannot compare those two.
True, a connection with Chabahar is beneficiary, Iranian relationship with China is even stronger than India, they need us to veto and defend their interest in UN and we have been their main weapons supplier for a longgg time. I doubt they will hand over strategic control of Chabahar to India, most likely another milking exercise.
 
.
India is investing it's money in chabaahar but I still feel that Iran American relations will bring twist in this port development.america is not happy with Iran missile development and it can impose more sanctions on Iran.i think this chabaahar port would be great for India but India should invest wisely.just focus on Iran American relations.they aren't good.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom