What's new

Graphic of India and Pakistan's underwater nuclear deterrent

Under MTCR no nuclear capable missile can be exported.. That's why even Brahmos aka yakhont has a range of 290km..

Read MTCR.

.

If you dont have Technical knowledge STOP ejaculating Nonsense.
Brahmos ALWAYS had 600 Km range. Its just a "software" restriction which limited it to 295 KM.

The Limit has been Removed : http://in.rbth.com/economics/defenc...n-mtcr-brahmos-range-to-be-more-lethal_650199

India has neither S-300 nether is akash that capable considering even Indian military doesn't want it...

Also kiddo tracking a stealthy SLCM isn't that easy..
.

We dont need S 300 ( We already have ) or S400 ( Already Ordered ) to take down a subsonic missile. Period.
Akash Missile is a HUGE HUGE HUGE Success and Indian Airforce and Army have placed OVER 10 Billion Dollars of Order !

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/india/akash.htm

Besides, India have SPYDER ( land ) and Barak 8 ( sea ) which are specifcally designed for Quick Reaction and SUPERSONIC missiles !

Your Babur doesn't stand a Chance.
 
.
Originally, the MTCR was limited to stopping the proliferation of nuclear-capable missiles, which was defined as a missile able to travel at least 300 kilometers with a 500-kilogram payload. Five hundred kilograms was considered the minimum weight of a first generation nuclear warhead, while 300 kilometers was believed to be the minimum distance needed to carry out a strategic strike. Members agreed in the summer of 1992 to expand the regime's objective to also apply to missiles and related technologies designed for chemical and biological weapons. That change took effect in January 1993. The move effectively tasked members with a making a more difficult and subjective assessment about an importer's intentions, as opposed to denying a specific capability (a missile able to deliver a 500-kilogram payload at least 300 kilometers), because many more missiles and unmanned delivery vehicles could be adapted to deliver lighter chemical and biological weapons payloads.
https://www.armscontrol.org/taxonomy/term/49
https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/mtcr
Lol its a JV not export..
So yes bramhos is nuclear capable
LOL since when export variant aka Yakhont has a range of 290km.. only P-800 Oniks has a 600km range.


And my dick is bigger than the eiffel tower.
http://www.defensenews.com/articles/with-mtcr-entry-india-to-increase-brahmos-cruise-missile-range

Looks like your dick is even bigger tha your brain
The pics of the so called indian S-300 are of a soviet Styx mobile launcher

India has s300 for quite some time
Lol fake news
http://www.thehindubusinessline.com...s-supersonic-missile-akash/article7173345.ece

Army and airforce operate Akash regiments since 2009
 
. . .
Klub class missiles are nuclear capable.

Brahmos IS nuclear and Submarine launched. Whether you like it or not. Tests are complete. Issue is the VLS/UVLS systems from the 75I is not ready.

Agreed about Babur 3. As a weapon system, Babur 3 has less or no impact on India. Around 350 Km is the EEZ of any nation. Babur has 450KM reach. So making sure the delivery system want to remain silent, it will stay out in International waters to make the hit. Pretty sure Mumbai and Vizag will be high in the list. Mumbai already has the S300 and Akash ABM system in place. soon it will get S400 as well. So yes, Babur 3 has to go a long way to be taken serious by the Indian Government. It is not a slight. Pakistan is taking the Israeli route. Commendable.
Akash is for planes as for s300 failed misrebly against tomahawk in Serbia and 1st Iraq war s400 new version of same s300 and we have also incorporate stealth capabilities in babur3 it would b most likely won't even b detected
 
. . . . . .
M


Even your own sources take a leak on your leaks..

No mention of nuclear capability anywhere except low class Indian sources ...! Not even on Brahmos page...

Which itself nullifies your claim about any planned submarine capability... Read your own sources ... Which ironically talk about so called "Vedic missiles" banned by Hindu gods to prevent destruction..:lol:


Neither can any nation export nuclear capable missiles or platforms... Not even a yakhont export variant...


Mr. ELITE MEMBER

It is us who have developed Brahmos and we know what it can do more than an Elite Member who only posts to troll or provoke to get the information. Be a man!
 
.
Serbia never had S300.
iraq and serb had russian sams little effective against planes cruise missiles
true current sams r much improved but so r counter measures on jets and cruise missiles so result would again b same
little effective best interceptor for attacking jet is aam from other jet and 4 cruise missile even that is questionable

If you dont have Technical knowledge STOP ejaculating Nonsense.
Brahmos ALWAYS had 600 Km range. Its just a "software" restriction which limited it to 295 KM.

The Limit has been Removed : http://in.rbth.com/economics/defenc...n-mtcr-brahmos-range-to-be-more-lethal_650199



We dont need S 300 ( We already have ) or S400 ( Already Ordered ) to take down a subsonic missile. Period.
Akash Missile is a HUGE HUGE HUGE Success and Indian Airforce and Army have placed OVER 10 Billion Dollars of Order !

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/india/akash.htm

Besides, India have SPYDER ( land ) and Barak 8 ( sea ) which are specifcally designed for Quick Reaction and SUPERSONIC missiles !

Your Babur doesn't stand a Chance.
iraq and serb had russian sams little effective against planes cruise missiles
true current sams r much improved but so r counter measures on jets and cruise missiles so result would again b same
little effective best interceptor for attacking jet is aam from other jet and 4 cruise missile even that is questionable
 
.
Akash is for planes as for s300 failed misrebly against tomahawk in Serbia and 1st Iraq war s400 new version of same s300 and we have also incorporate stealth capabilities in babur3 it would b most likely won't even b detected

Please. Read and troll. This is not about your feelings.

Well...in a few years it might be.

Unfortunately, No. India or China or Pakistan doesn't stand and wait when it comes to tech.

Take example of PN boosting their submarine strength. It was not secret or surprise that a SLCM would follow.
What did India do? P8I is happening. First ones were based in Kadamba for the Chinese. Now in western flank as well.

Pakistan will go ahead. India will go ahead many times more.

Another example. India was leading the growth rate ahead of China. China was growing as well. But their growth is far ahead of India. It is a growth on 10Tn.
 
.
Please. Read and troll. This is not about your feelings.



Unfortunately, No. India or China or Pakistan doesn't stand and wait when it comes to tech.

Take example of PN boosting their submarine strength. It was not secret or surprise that a SLCM would follow.
What did India do? P8I is happening. First ones were based in Kadamba for the Chinese. Now in western flank as well.

Pakistan will go ahead. India will go ahead many times more.

Another example. India was leading the growth rate ahead of China. China was growing as well. But their growth is far ahead of India. It is a growth on 10Tn.
Almost every detail in regards to the Hangor-class submarines remain unknown.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hangor-class_submarine

Submarines aren't made obsolete by a few anti-sub warfare aircraft. It's gonna take alot more than that.
 
.
Almost every detail in regards to the Hangor-class submarines remain unknown.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hangor-class_submarine

Submarines aren't made obsolete by a few anti-sub warfare aircraft. It's gonna take alot more than that.

Anti Submarine warfare is not about making submarines obsolete. But tracking them and letting others know where it might be, fighting them using torpedoes and such, jamming its communication if possible.
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom