Pmpn,s media team used social media to promote animosity against army,pti and certain media channels fake news were spread by that team do they have no shame?
Not a assumption on my part but what you said:
Rest assured i have no purpose as i am not the one behind Panama or any other case directly implicating Nawaz with corruption and money laundering. It is only Allah's wish that such cases came to light and exposed nawaz and his cult for what they are. I explicitly gave you the example of South Korean President but than South Korea does not have morons who would come out and defend a corrupt person. Rather they would send him/her packing.
Called you a moron because your post lacked substance and it hasnt changed since than. You tried to picture the entire governments of the world in the same class as your thugs with nooracracy are in Pakistan, i merely asked you to show me a single evidence where government would lie and than shamelessly defend those lies? Clition had to apologise after Monica Lewinsky scandal, he did not shamelessly defended it and called it a threat against democracy. Michael Flynn resigned after he lied about links with Russia. He did not defended it and called it a conspiracy by the opposition. I can give you many other examples but would it matter?
There is nothing patriotic about what you are doing. Lets be clear about it. Being a patriotic Pakistani you should had raised your voice against a PM who lied on the floor of the parliament, who could not provide any evidence about his wealth other than a letter from Qattari Prince nor could he prove how the wealth was sent abroad and how much tax was paid on that money.
U spend so much tym supporting a corrupt leader ( Not PM
) . do u live on unemployment benefit ? U spend so much tym supporting a corrupt leader ( Not PM
BTW no government should tolerate baseless allegations . at least have some shame writing that . our PM and family named all over the world for corruption . he is not accused by imran khan .
If he was honest like imrankhan . he would have presented all record but shamelessly using law and institutions to save him
Nope this is just babooni chutiyapa they make shitup like this with zero evidence to back it up
Lol pmln was born in womb of dictatorship they got a hell lot of help in the 90,s from isi dont diss papa isi baboon leagis
Democracy also means FREEDOM OF SPEECH but these words are alien to Zia,s broodlingsIt is not about supporting corrupt government as it is about supporting stability.
Of course, you already implied without hearing my side of story so i take it anything i say is likely to fall on deaf ears i presume.
Personal tactics is only your hope since that tactics you are employing boils down to the similar reasons for repeatedly u-turns which you guys turn to PMLN as comparison analysis last resort in order to evade the topic which is clearly the case here.
Because of Establishment, Bhutto became icon, legacy for the future generation of Bhutto, hence Benazir.
Zardari came to the powers through the deals with Musharraf for his exit-strategy which leaves much interpretation wide open in regards to suspicious timing of the murder of Benazir Bhutto.
Yes, thanks to PMLN. PMLN has huge history of launching military operation against MQM, and it was not coincident why recent military operation launched under PMLN with the cooperation of General Raheel sealed the fate of MQM.
Bear in mind that MQM was also dying in late 90s at the hand of PMLN until Musharraf's illegaly takeover revived MQM and allowed Karachi to progress in ruins.
Nawaz Sharif is democratically elected government. Meaning people chose him. And people chose him three times despite the presence of the establishment. Whereas for the establishment, they are dictators that imposed the authority many times against the wills of people.
Do you understand the different between dictatorship and democracy? The establishment is anti-democracy, not democratically elected government that is counting on the public votes for the next election as well.
Except everything that happened to Pakistan because of the establishment. The establishment took the control from the beginning, defamed the sister of the founder of Pakistan, hanged Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto to death, launched Blasphemy law, intervened and interrupted the process of democracy repeatedly including the recent year of 2014 that forced power-sharing agreement upon the democratically elected government against his wills.
Even today, the establishment controls the foreign policy. Because of the establishment, the democracy couldn't enjoy its stability and you complain why the democracy is unstable.
Pay attention to the quote. I feel like i might be debating with the clueless member. No offense.
Nawaz Sharif, Afghan Taliban, Blasphemy Law, MQM are the product of the establishment. It has always been that way and judging by recent events, it will remain the same judging by the forced power-sharing agreement against the wills of democratically elected government.
Exhibit A Cyril Almeida,s sourceIt is not about supporting corrupt government as it is about supporting stability.
Of course, you already implied without hearing my side of story so i take it anything i say is likely to fall on deaf ears i presume.
Personal tactics is only your hope since that tactics you are employing boils down to the similar reasons for repeatedly u-turns which you guys turn to PMLN as comparison analysis last resort in order to evade the topic which is clearly the case here.
Because of Establishment, Bhutto became icon, legacy for the future generation of Bhutto, hence Benazir.
Zardari came to the powers through the deals with Musharraf for his exit-strategy which leaves much interpretation wide open in regards to suspicious timing of the murder of Benazir Bhutto.
Yes, thanks to PMLN. PMLN has huge history of launching military operation against MQM, and it was not coincident why recent military operation launched under PMLN with the cooperation of General Raheel sealed the fate of MQM.
Bear in mind that MQM was also dying in late 90s at the hand of PMLN until Musharraf's illegaly takeover revived MQM and allowed Karachi to progress in ruins.
Nawaz Sharif is democratically elected government. Meaning people chose him. And people chose him three times despite the presence of the establishment. Whereas for the establishment, they are dictators that imposed the authority many times against the wills of people.
Do you understand the different between dictatorship and democracy? The establishment is anti-democracy, not democratically elected government that is counting on the public votes for the next election as well.
Except everything that happened to Pakistan because of the establishment. The establishment took the control from the beginning, defamed the sister of the founder of Pakistan, hanged Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto to death, launched Blasphemy law, intervened and interrupted the process of democracy repeatedly including the recent year of 2014 that forced power-sharing agreement upon the democratically elected government against his wills.
Even today, the establishment controls the foreign policy. Because of the establishment, the democracy couldn't enjoy its stability and you complain why the democracy is unstable.
Pay attention to the quote. I feel like i might be debating with the clueless member. No offense.
Nawaz Sharif, Afghan Taliban, Blasphemy Law, MQM are the product of the establishment. It has always been that way and judging by recent events, it will remain the same judging by the forced power-sharing agreement against the wills of democratically elected government.
Such as? It would be nice to have examples. Lately, there has been false news based on the rumors.
Oh panama case is without evidence really?Freedom of speech doesn't mean resort to accusation without evidence and promote racial wars. It appears you lacks the understanding of freedom of speech and expression. Cyber laws also exits all over the worlds including North America.
You do know that it is people's support that brought Nawaz Sharif to the power; three times to be precise. Although, his first two terms were interrupted by the establishment. And PMLN is likely to win the next election due to people's support again. It appears PTI is failing to understand the democracy very well.
Exhibit A and B. Sources please.
Oh panama case is without evidence really?
The proof is out they have been named by them not Ik
Racial wars hmm kind of like jag punjabi jag teri pag wich lag gaya dagh
If someone calls Erdogan corrupt and he jails him what do you call Erdogan?
Anti free speech dictator same thing here they threatened to criminalize criticism of the govt
People support lol it was isi,s ashirwaad in the 90,s
Dont you read news?
Pervaiz Rawshit was fired because of this case
Panama papers r real papers not fake fudge or somebody made at home .Nobody challenged them anywhere around the world .These papers were part of record that law firm has .Do you understand what is Panama case? It is revelation, not evidence. There is no trace that can ties to the Panama case. That is why Panama case is at best bragging rights and even today, case is still on-going.
If somebody calls Erdogan corrupt and fails to provide evidence, then the accuser will be sentenced to jail. Just like if somebody accuse you of criminal in public and fails to provide the evidence, that accuser will be jailed. That is called common sense which has been there for the long time long before we were born and long that prevails after we die.
As i said, you lack the basic understanding of freedom of speech and expression.
In Canada, we have system 'Presumption of Innocent'.
In Canada, section 11(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms states: "Any person charged with an offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law in a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal".
Whereas for the accusers, if they failed to prove, then they are in trouble including the potential sues from the accused party as well. There has been extensive debate on this topic not long ago and probably traces back to Panama threads.
Imran Khan is idiot. Why? In his opinion, he can accuse against certain figure and expect certain figure to prove their innocent. That's how idiot Imran Khan is and his understanding on Justice system that contradicts to the real Justice system. And that is the man you want in the power.
