What's new

Global Food Security Index 2016: East Asia Regional Rankings

TaiShang

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
27,848
Reaction score
70
Country
China
Location
Taiwan, Province Of China
Data presented by the Economist Intelligence Unit. Considering that East Asia is NEA and SEA, dataset also includes some Central Asian and South Asian nations. The analysis is based on three indicators: Affordability (price), Availability (access), and Quality & Safety (value).

upload_2017-4-12_15-50-21.png

upload_2017-4-12_15-50-52.png

upload_2017-4-12_15-51-26.png


http://foodsecurityindex.eiu.com/Index

@Shotgunner51 , @ahojunk , @Andrew Jin , @terranMarine , @Jlaw
 
.
Data presented by the Economist Intelligence Unit. Considering that East Asia is NEA and SEA, dataset also includes some Central Asian and South Asian nations. The analysis is based on three indicators: Affordability (price), Availability (access), and Quality & Safety (value).

View attachment 390217
View attachment 390218
View attachment 390219

http://foodsecurityindex.eiu.com/Index

@Shotgunner51 , @ahojunk , @Andrew Jin , @terranMarine , @Jlaw

I find this index extremely flawed.

This assumes peace time food security, with global access to food supply.

But another kind of food security is what happens in the case of war, conflict, or shortage of food.

In that case, the rank one country here, Singapore, is among the most vulnerable since it has no food production of its own.
 
.
The global picture. Same source. Obviously, food security is very much conditional to economic development. Big agriculture population does not mean food security. At times, the presence of food also does not mean lack of hunger. Some hunger-ridden nations are also grain exporters.

Interesting details that I learn.

upload_2017-4-12_16-8-45.png
 
.
Food security is closely linked with hunger; the greater security (access, affordability, quality) there is, the less hunger.

Here is 2016 Global Hunger Index:

upload_2017-4-12_18-33-18.png


The reddish it gets, the most alarming it becomes. The greener, the better.

Industrialized countries have all sorted out hunger, although there might be widespread under-nutrition in some like the US.

http://www.ifpri.org/topic/global-hunger-index
 
. .
Industrialized countries have all sorted out hunger, although there might be widespread under-nutrition in some like the US.

Any undernutrition in the US is not due to lack of food availability. It is simply due to bad nutritional choices made by some people. You can't put a gun to people's heads and force them to eat healthy produce.

We happen to be very lucky that due to our trade with Central and South America we have an uninterrupted supply of fresh fruits and vegetables year round. I think the only thing that goes "out of season" for a few months are cherries and watermelons. Pretty much everything else is available 365 days a year. :enjoy:
Screen Shot 2017-04-12 at 9.51.34 PM.jpg

We source fresh grapes from Chile (10,000km away, 47,000 tons in 2016!) to fill in growing season gaps and kiwi from New Zealand (15,000km away).


Screen Shot 2017-04-12 at 9.25.50 PM.jpg

The US has probably been #1 since the 1870's when refrigeration in food shipping became popular. We could bring in stuff from Central/South America without it spoiling.

Screen Shot 2017-04-12 at 9.27.51 PM.jpg

China still has a ways to go.
 
Last edited:
.
Same package above, from Chili, is available in Taiwan. So, nothing revolutionary really.

***

East Asian food safety, including South and SE Asia, is improving in general with only few countries experiencing decline (Japan due, probably, to the Fukushima disaster).


upload_2017-4-13_10-10-32.png


upload_2017-4-13_10-11-59.png


upload_2017-4-13_10-12-16.png
 
.
I find this index extremely flawed.

This assumes peace time food security, with global access to food supply.

But another kind of food security is what happens in the case of war, conflict, or shortage of food.

In that case, the rank one country here, Singapore, is among the most vulnerable since it has no food production of its own.


We do produce our own food. It's just that we don't produce enough.
 
.
Storage and distribution is also important. Strategic storage by government is needed to keep prices stable.

I know of one country where storage is simply piling bags of grain in the fields and chucking a tarp over it. Needless to say, a lot of it is simply wasted while millions starve in said country. I wont name it or a flood of internet ..indu... 's will lynch me.
 
.
.
Storage and distribution is also important. Strategic storage by government is needed to keep prices stable.

I know of one country where storage is simply piling bags of grain in the fields and chucking a tarp over it. Needless to say, a lot of it is simply wasted while millions starve in said country. I wont name it or a flood of internet ..indu... 's will lynch me.


Oh come @+4vsgorillas-Apebane you we always appreciate your inputs on these matters

On topic
Indian govt has increased investment in Food Production/Storage Infra and with everything thing going digital we should be able to get into top 10 in less than a decade
 
. .
Storage and distribution is also important. Strategic storage by government is needed to keep prices stable.

I know of one country where storage is simply piling bags of grain in the fields and chucking a tarp over it. Needless to say, a lot of it is simply wasted while millions starve in said country. I wont name it or a flood of internet ..indu... 's will lynch me.

I think storage (access) and distribution (availability) are two of the three indices covered by the report. It is very true that without access, even the availability of food would not prevent hunger. As I mentioned, some hunger-stricken regions are also food/grain exporting region at the same time.
Proper storage would ensure availability at all times by reducing waste, which would also help to keep prices stable.
In the end, it is the government's job to ensure food safety because private citizens or companies will never have enough resources to ensure it. Government should also strictly control and regulate all aspects of food.
Hunger is the worst form of human rights violation.
 
.
where is russia? i know for a fact russia got it sussed out, i bet you they got underground seed vault and food storage with long shelf life just in case of war etc.
usa has this but it is for the elite. i bet china too they are collectively wise people plus afew chinese dying they dont care it just numbers they want to reduce population.

england the most dirtiest, queen will be eating with rothschild while rest starve just like irish potato famine.

I think storage (access) and distribution (availability) are two of the three indices covered by the report. It is very true that without access, even the availability of food would not prevent hunger. As I mentioned, some hunger-stricken regions are also food/grain exporting region at the same time.
Proper storage would ensure availability at all times by reducing waste, which would also help to keep prices stable.
In the end, it is the government's job to ensure food safety because private citizens or companies will never have enough resources to ensure it. Government should also strictly control and regulate all aspects of food.
Hunger is the worst form of human rights violation.

bro Chinese government allows industries to produce food packaging that apparently messes up your hormones. westerners going holiday to China say do not drink tap water or be be careful which bottle of water to buy etc.

this is interesting The China Study.
http://www.socakajak-klub.si/mma/The+China+Study.pdf/20111116065942/
 
.
http://www.zmescience.com/science/news-science/imported-food-14042017/
Some two billion people depend on imported food

Whenever population pressure increases, more food is imported.


This image shows the food import strategy globally. Image credits: Aalto University.

During World War II, Britain’s need for imported food was evident. Surrounded by enemy troops, imports basically came to a halt, and Britain suffered greatly. If something similar were to happen today (not due to war, but let’s say due to droughts or freak weather affecting agriculture), results could be equally devastating in many parts of the world.

Nowadays, the variety and availability of food are no longer restricted by the diversity of locally grown food and the time where food was geographically limited has long passed. Like many other things, food too has become a globalized commodity. But how does foreign, imported food interact with the local market?

Researchers from Aalto University in Finland looked at statistics from the Food and Agriculture Organization, also analyzing how technological development influences food production. They found that as soon as local food production became insufficient or was close to the limit, imports started rising — something which makes a lot of sense.

‘Although this has been a topic of global discussion for a long time, previous research has not been able to demonstrate a clear connection between resource scarcity and food imports. We performed a global analysis focusing on regions where water availability restricts production, and examined them from 1961 until 2009, evaluating the extent to which the growing population pressure was met by increasing food imports,’ explains Postdoctoral Researcher Miina Porkka.

Between 1961 and 1999, there was a 400% increase in worldwide food exports and food trade. After that, trade (and especially food trade) became more and more liberalized and imports continued to grow. Surprisingly, it wasn’t only the richer parts of the world that fell back on imports — poorer areas didn’t hesitate to invest in an import strategy. But is this the right approach?

At the first glance, the answer seems to be a resounding ‘yes.’ You don’t have enough food, you get it from somewhere else, simple as that. But food can be price sensitive and price and production shocks can spread widely and undermine food security, especially in poorer countries where people can’t afford price raises, even if they are temporary.

Also, in some cases, imports suck out money which could be used for developing local, sustainable strategies. Especially in sub-Saharan Africa and India, there are opportunities to sustainably improve food production (through irrigations, more and better tractors, more efficient use of nutrients, etc) — but money is funneled elsewhere, something which is pretty worrying.

‘Keeping food demand in check is the key issue. Controlling population growth plays an essential role in this work, but it would also be important to enhance production chains by reducing food waste and meat consumption. Since one quarter of all the food produced in the world is wasted, reducing this would be really significant on a global level.’
 
.
Back
Top Bottom