Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
New Recruit
From which constituency Musharraf will take part in election? FB-420.
New Recruit
who ever supports muSh4rraf c4n b3 a per$0N ho can s3ll his countries dau9hter$. e.g the case of a4fia s|ddiqi : / mshar4f is d/ck ch3n3y's d|cK
And who cannot help but write in such a retarded characterset must be given a dhulai.
Also, Aafia Siddiqui is not a daughter of Pakistan. We have wasted 2 million dollars on legal fees over a terrorist while millions of children die due to lack of health services in the country.
Mushraff could be the Ata Turk of Pakistan. When Turkey was devasted and bankrupted by allied forces, it was not the promise of skyscrapers and shopping malls which united them but the humble message of solidarity, unity and vision of Mustafa Kemal which unitied them.
That must be the best joke ever.
Mustafa Kemal Atatürk (Turkish pronunciation: [mustaˈfa ceˈmal ataˈtyɾk]; indeterminate, 188110 November 1938) was a Turkish army officer, revolutionary statesman, writer, and founder of the Republic of Turkey as well as its first president.
Atatürk became known as an extremely capable military officer during World War I.[1] Following the defeat of the Ottoman Empire, he led the Turkish national movement in the Turkish War of Independence. Having established a provisional government in Ankara, he defeated the forces sent by the Allies. His successful military campaigns led to the liberation of the country and to the establishment of Turkey. During his presidency, Atatürk embarked upon a program of political, economic, and cultural reforms. An admirer of the Age of Enlightenment, he sought to transform the former Ottoman Empire into a modern and secular nation-state. The principles of Atatürk's reforms, upon which modern Turkey was established, are referred to as Kemalism.
From which constituency Musharraf will take part in election?
Ataturk knew what he was doing and what he was aiming for. He never compromised to remain in power (MMA where art thou?) nor did he usurp power in the wake of an utterly failed war that destroyed a fairly well going peace process (regardless of Sharif's dictatorial ameer ul momineen style). Ataturk was a nationalist who established a nation at a time when nation-states where emerging from the wake of empires. It was a time for leaders and nationalists to rise. Nobody can fill those shoes in today's context in any way. However, I find it hypocritical that it's illegal to criticize him since nobody should be above criticism).
Musharraf has no traits of a good statesman. We had two good statesmen in the corridors of power. One was the founder who died too early and the second was Hussain Shaheed Suhrawardy who was forced into exile by our first dictator (who was an incapable soldier as well).
In an established nation-state you have to stop dreaming of heroes and oxymoronic benevolent dictators. Heroism has no place in a nation-state that is 60 years old. Only a systematic approach can improve an established country, worshipping thy lords has no place in a progressive nation.
who ever supports muSh4rraf c4n b3 a per$0N ho can s3ll his countries dau9hter$. e.g the case of a4fia s|ddiqi : / mshar4f is d/ck ch3n3y's d|cK
As always, I'm returning very soon (even though very soon has taken more than 6 months now)
Musharraf plans return, looks to Army for security
Monday, July 19, 2010
Attacks Nawaz, Zardari policies
By Rauf Klasra
Musharraf said if the military was under any constraints not to provide him security, he would raise his own private security on his return to Pakistan in the coming months to face both Nawaz Sahrif and Asif Ali Zardari.