What's new

Give kashmir or take kashmir. Make up your mind as enemy is getting bold

Kashmir issue is one of jealousy between people of the two countries, rather than an issue of land or power. It will continue to drag on till people in both countries become educated enough to put jealousy aside and realize it's a waste of time, energy and resources. Development is the only way to solve it.

Besides, there is enough interest among China, USA and Russia to keep this going since it provides a valuable market for export of arms.

Either education, or economic collapse, will hasten a solution.
 
. . .
To the winner belong the spoils, whichever side it might be.

The ideal solution would be a case where there is NO winner and where a compromise is reached so that both sides can claim victory.

Talking purely from a business perspective, India and Pak spend close to $40billion a year on the Kashmir issue. Kashmir being a tourist hotspot (or Switzerland of the east if you want to call it that way) will fetch another $10b in tourism. That's $50b a year saved just by cooperating which can be split between the two countries for development. But hey, nationalism takes priority over rationalism. What do I know?
 
.
The ideal solution would be a case where there is NO winner and where a compromise is reached so that both sides can claim victory.

Talking purely from a business perspective, India and Pak spend close to $40billion a year on the Kashmir issue. Kashmir being a tourist hotspot (or Switzerland of the east if you want to call it that way) will fetch another $10b in tourism. That's $50b a year saved just by cooperating which can be split between the two countries for development. But hey, nationalism takes priority over rationalism. What do I know?

I would agree with what you have said above, and rightly so.
 
. . .
Has India formally made an offer to convert the Loc/AGPL into a permanent recognized international border?
No. But India won't offer anything- good or bad.

It is a defacto accepted by most Indians that this is the only viable solution.

Its Pakistani people who have to come to terms with this fact now.
 
.
No. But India won't offer anything- good or bad.

It is a defacto accepted by most Indians that this is the only viable solution.

Its Pakistani people who have to come to terms with this fact now.

A formal offer by India would go a long way in getting Pakistan to accept the facts on the ground.
 
.
What breaking up your country? Eh, did you blank out '71? We are in no hurry for the rest. :D
44 years, still nothing

Forget everything else, war is fought on the basis of oil. Pakistan can sustain 2 weeks at max. 3 if civilian usage is controlled. India can outrun
hmm did we or did we not fight for almost three weeks in 1965? and 4 weeks in 1971?
 
. . . .
The enemy is getting stupid to be honest -

Option 1. Pakistan peacefully gives back occupied Princely state of J&K, including Gilgit Baltistan.
Option 2. India takes it back through war and breaks up Pakistan in pieces.

As an Indian citizen, no other option is acceptable to me.

There is an option 3. If you care to ask-
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom