What's new

Give kashmir or take kashmir. Make up your mind as enemy is getting bold

LOL my grandfather was an indian kashmiri, who migrated to the other side of the border.Now that we have that established let me give you the opinion of someone who actually has the right to say something on this matter.

First of all, you don't get to determine who is kashmiri and who is not. Nor do you get to set any criteria or standard for us to live up to. That's our job! Our people, our territory so our vNext, yes but India is involved in that game of politics inkashmir as much as pakistan. Let's not even get started on India's relationship with Kashmiris. Lastly, just like India gets to vote for its future and Pakistan votes for its, the kashmiris should vote for theirs and their opinion should be the most important not that of an indian or a pakistani. You preach democracy so much, where is it now?

Having said all of this, I do understand the situation and security dilemma each country faces and do acknowledge that as much as Kashmiris want to be independent, that will not be good for the region overall. I don't believe in blind patriotism and nationalism, so I would be okay with any option that brings (relative) peace to the region as long as the human rights of all people (indian, kashmiris and pakistanis) are respected.

Btw Pakistan does give citizenship to kashmiris! I normally don't comment on such topics but this kind of attitude towards kashmir and it's people is very disturbing and I have seen it on both sides of the border.

It's OK that you feel some nostalgia about Kashmir and you have right to talk about the old days over a glass of whisky like A Q Khan would talk about Bhopal or Musharraf might talk about Delhi. That's it. Doesn't mean they own Bhopal or Delhi.

You are a Pakistani now. Your opinion doesn't matter any more than any other Pakistani.
Good night. Sweet dreams.
 
Last edited:
.
It's OK that you feel some nostalgia about Kashmir and you have right to talk about the old days over a glass of whisky like A Q Khan would talk about Bhopal or Musharraf might talk about Delhi. That's it. Doesn't mean they own Bhopal or Delhi.

You are a Pakistani now. Your opinion doesn't matter any more than any other Pakistani.
Good night. Sweet dreams
.

:lol: aye aye captain :p:
shukar hai apne pehle bata diya verna mein toh ek aur lecture daynay walli thi modi gi :D :P
 
.
There is no way for Pakistan to take Kashmir. They have tried all the tricks in the book, and some out of it to wrest Kashmir from India and failed miserably.
 
.
There won't ever be a localized war in Kashmir if India feels pressured.

The only reason why India kept the Kargil issue localized was because the MEA(Ministry of External Affairs) was able to convince the MoD(Ministry of Defense - that runs the Army) that they will be able to damage Pakistan very effectively if the Army kept its ops localized to Kashmir. And the MEA delivered on their promise, Pakistan's international standing and credibility was shattered internationally.

However, if the Indian positions are ever at threat, India would escalate the war across the entire front.

Handover Modi to Pakistan this will increase India's international standing.
 
. .
You know...I really like your posts rahi...soo assertive :D it's inspiring! :D

Actually no one from Pakistan side is standing against them. I have to take this plunge. Didn't like it but I have to do it.
 
. .
Option 1. Pakistan peacefully gives back occupied Princely state of J&K, including Gilgit Baltistan.
Option 2. India takes it back through war and breaks up Pakistan in pieces.

As an Indian citizen, no other option is acceptable to me.
Well, then come and get it mr. indian citizen.
 
.
Handover Modi to Pakistan this will increase India's international standing.
Modi has more international credibility than the entire Pakistani ruling establishment of army, feudals and bureaucracy..
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom