Thickness means it cant fly over 700 km/h. Considering its small weird wings, small engine with top intakes, not all movable thick canards it wont be maneuverable.
have you anything to reply to my comment?or still you prefer to fool yourself?Thickness means it cant fly over 700 km/h. Considering its small weird wings, small engine with top intakes, not all movable thick canards it wont be maneuverable.
So overall F313 is stealth WW1 fighter.
P.S. Actually not so stealth because if right angles near intakes.
I've already answered u on that nonsense. I can repeat again if u insist.
As I said before, if forward canard is a wing that means your thing is basically a BIPLANE - a WW1 design.
Millions times: thick wing is only good at low speeds. A modern fighter with thick wing is noting but lame joke.
lol . that picture that they say is Photoshop , IS Photoshop and was created by one of the military.ir site , so the users can use it as wallpaper
first of all let me make it clear for you....you know nothing about aerodynamic!just keep this in mind and dont open your mouth certainly.there are already wind tunnel with the speed of 8 and 3 mach in Iran that help the engineeers to design a sure fighter jet as well.believe me...they know more about aerodynamic then you and me.even if this thing was in order for internal consumption,they could do it by showing old shafaq jet or even mock up of F-35 or F-22I've already answered u on that nonsense. I can repeat again if u insist.
As I said before, if forward canard is a wing that means your thing is basically a BIPLANE - a WW1 design.
And there is no any magic solution about reducing drag. Because when you reduce the drag of wing by ripping the air in front of it you also reduce the wings lift capability so overall L/D ratio will be even lower.
Millions times: thick wing is only good at low speeds. A modern fighter with thick wing is noting but lame joke.
I am an engineer, also not in aerodynamics, the aviation is my hobby so I have knowledge in aerodynamics.
Yes, there are people who know aerodynamics in Iran, but why bother and call them if you are buying their lame fake anyway? Mullahs learned that whatever they say you will buy it, so they simply dont care.
Double wings (biplane) and thick wing profile - all that belongs to WW1 era.
As I said, what matters is lift/drag ratio. And this ratio will be lower, much lower. Thats why no one makes fighters with double wings since middle of 1930-es. Except Iran
If you want to improve low speed maneuverability, you need big straight wings like A-10. This thing's wings are bad in everything: they are bad for supersonic because they are thick and double, they are bad for subsonic speeds because they are small and too much canted.
