A.Rahman
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2006
- Messages
- 4,728
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Is the "male friend" getting two hundred lashes?
I think that the law applies to females only.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is the "male friend" getting two hundred lashes?
No one is questioning the "existence of the law", but rather criticizing the law itself - slavery too once was legal, but legality does not take away from the immorality of the practice.
I think that the law applies to females only.
Correct. She didn't deserve to be raped, but the fact is she was breaking saudi law, as were the rapists. Crazy laws perhaps, but those are the laws there.
No need for that gibberish.
I'm not sure a slavery comparison is appropriate here AM. I can only think of something equivalent from personal experience..once in the uni gym I was at, there was a "woman's only hour"..not only did they occupy half the gym, but included all the manly equipment. If someone broke the rule (I considered it stupid) and turned up, they'd be thrown out, perhaps arrested if one continued to be obstinate..rules are rules, laws are laws. I'm just not sure you can compare this law to slavery. Slavery was unjust because it was discriminatory (not to say they've ended that even now), whereas this law is equally discriminatory (stupid in the eyes of some) to men, women etc. That's not to say I like the law of course, and I don't know if the Saudis like it either. Probably havent been polled.
I'm not sure a slavery comparison is appropriate here AM. I can only think of something equivalent from personal experience..once in the uni gym I was at, there was a "woman's only hour"..not only did they occupy half the gym, but included all the manly equipment. If someone broke the rule (I considered it stupid) and turned up, they'd be thrown out, perhaps arrested if one continued to be obstinate..rules are rules, laws are laws. I'm just not sure you can compare this law to slavery. Slavery was unjust because it was discriminatory (not to say they've ended that even now), whereas this law is equally discriminatory (stupid in the eyes of some) to men, women etc. That's not to say I like the law of course, and I don't know if the Saudis like it either. Probably havent been polled.
New Recruit
Which law applies to females only?
was the guy punished for being in the car too?
I think its the saudi law that women can't be alone in the car with unknown men.
You can consider it a jibrish or rant what ever you like prove me wrong.
why are you anti Talibans then they are trying to inforce same law in pakistan.
so some one could be punished for being there in the gym at the same time.yet for raping a girl and man victims get punished.
why don't you please tell us all what the punishment of Rape in Islam.
whats the punishment for homosexuality in Saudi
whats the punishment for homosexuality in Islam.
I think its the saudi law that women can't be alone in the car with unknown men.
A.Rahman Rape is Rape these Animals pulled them over and Raped them both.
Did they knew before they pulled them over if that man was her brother or husband no they pulled them over so they can Rape them.
That alone should be enough to hang them all or stone them to death.instead victim is being punished And thats disgusting.
The appearance of "getting punished for being raped" arises from the way these laws are set up - the problem in Pakistan, for example, was that if you were raped, you had to produce 4 witnesses to prove it (an impossible condition to fulfill) - and if unable to, it was considered "consensual sex, and you got punished if the partner was not your husband.
One would think that the "honorable" Saudi court would have had a bit more sympathy for the woman considering what she went through - it was "punishment" enough - but like our Mullah's in Pakistan, their utmost priority is by hook or crook maintaining the "chastity" of our women - forget domestic violence, pedophilia, crime or anything else.
I find it unbelievable that some here are trying to justify possibly the most moronic law/law case I have ever seen.
Common sense seems to be in short supply in Saud it seems...