Genetic connection with IVC for Entire South Asia.

[Juggernaut_Flat_Plane_V8]

Whoes dreaming ? I am just calling out your BS. Your intellectual gymnastics is causing issues within your own country. Read and weep.

4500-year-old DNA from Rakhigarhi reveals evidence that will unsettle Hindutva nationalists - Cover Story News - Issue Date: Sep 10, 2018 (indiatoday.in)

The findings of a highly anticipated study of ancient DNA from the graveyard of the historic Indian town of Rakhigarhi reveal evidence that will unsettle many Hindutva nationalists



Q: Were they closer to popular perceptions of 'Aryans' or of 'Dravidians'? A: Dravidians .



Q: Were they more akin to the South Indians or North Indians of today? A: South Indians.








As this article suggest, from your own miserable country, that people there are south Indians. Not punjabi, rajistani or Gujrati as you are trying to sell. LOL



If you are burried in Germany, and many thousands years gone, they found your bones , according to your logic, Germany will become part of vedic history, not realising, that you were a economic migrant. LOL

Stop embarrassing yourself kid. Archelogy has already established the origin of IVC in Pakistan. The rest is just the offshoot from it.

Lel ---->"popular perceptions" and "closer"

As much as Levant have claims on Egyptian civilization sites in that region. Only that it lies there but belongs wholly to Egyptian cultural legacy.

Pakistan can claim legacy whats within its borders and India can claim legacy to whats within its borders

 

[Taimoor Khan]

Lel ---->"popular perceptions" and "closer"

Why dont you lot first agree if the skeleton is off south Indian or local rajistani, Punjabi or Gujrati? LOL

 

[Bilal.]

Lel ---->"popular perceptions" and "closer"



Pakistan can claim legacy whats within its borders and India can claim legacy to whats within its borders

Nope Pakistan has claim on the whole since it’s centered here. India has none.

 

[Juggernaut_Flat_Plane_V8]

Nope Pakistan has claim on the whole since it’s centered here. India has none.

LoL nope Pakistan can claim whats inside their border and none outside of it...by the way...why donot you concentrate on Bangladesh?

 

[Bilal.]

LoL nope Pakistan can claim whats inside their border and none outside of it...by the way...why donot you concentrate on Bangladesh?

No. Just like Egypt has sole claim to Egyptian civilization. Pakistan has sole claim on IVC based on the origin and centre of the culture. Stop being a culture culture. Stop claiming Pakistani, Nepali, Bangladeshi cultures.

 

[Juggernaut_Flat_Plane_V8]

Why dont you lot first agree if the skeleton is off south Indian or local rajistani, Punjabi or Gujrati? LOL

from the paper:

The Iranian-related ancestry in the IVC derives from a lineage leading to early Iranian farmers, herders, and hunter gatherers before their ancestors separated, contradicting the hypothesis that the shared ancestry between early Iranians and South Asians reflects a large-scale spread of western Iranian farmers east. Instead, sampled ancient genomes from the Iranian plateau and IVC descend from different groups of hunter-gatherers who began farming without being connected by substantial movement of people.

Our evidence that the Iranian-related ancestry in the IVC Cline diverged from lineages leading to ancient Iranian hunter-gatherers, herders, and farmers prior to their ancestors’ separation places constraints on the spread of Iranian-related ancestry across the combined region of the Iranian plateau and South Asia, where it is represented in all ancient and modern genomic data sampled to date. The Belt Cave individual dates to 10,000 BCE, definitively before the advent of farming anywhere in Iran, which implies that the split leading to the Iranian-related component in the IVC Cline predates the advent of farming there as well…Thus, the Iranian-related ancestry in the IVC Cline descends from a different group of hunter-gatherers from the ancestors of the earliest known farmers or herders in the western Iranian plateau.

No. Just like Egypt has sole claim to Egyptian civilization. Pakistan has sole claim on IVC based on the origin and centre of the culture. Stop being a culture culture. Stop claiming Pakistani, Nepali, Bangladeshi cultures.

we never claim IVC ...we claim Lothal Rakhigarhi continuum...your screeching on the internet wont change that BANGLADESHI

 

[Bilal.]

from the paper:

The Iranian-related ancestry in the IVC derives from a lineage leading to early Iranian farmers, herders, and hunter gatherers before their ancestors separated, contradicting the hypothesis that the shared ancestry between early Iranians and South Asians reflects a large-scale spread of western Iranian farmers east. Instead, sampled ancient genomes from the Iranian plateau and IVC descend from different groups of hunter-gatherers who began farming without being connected by substantial movement of people.

Our evidence that the Iranian-related ancestry in the IVC Cline diverged from lineages leading to ancient Iranian hunter-gatherers, herders, and farmers prior to their ancestors’ separation places constraints on the spread of Iranian-related ancestry across the combined region of the Iranian plateau and South Asia, where it is represented in all ancient and modern genomic data sampled to date. The Belt Cave individual dates to 10,000 BCE, definitively before the advent of farming anywhere in Iran, which implies that the split leading to the Iranian-related component in the IVC Cline predates the advent of farming there as well…Thus, the Iranian-related ancestry in the IVC Cline descends from a different group of hunter-gatherers from the ancestors of the earliest known farmers or herders in the western Iranian plateau.

we never claim IVC ...we claim Lothal Rakhigarhi continuum...your screeching on the internet wont change that BANGLADESHI

Not even those sites as they just lie in today’s india. Just like some Egyptian sites might be in countries to the south, north or west of Egypt but those countries can’t claim anything.

Why the hate for Bangladeshis? In the other thread you were claiming to love Bangladeshis.

 

[Juggernaut_Flat_Plane_V8]

Not even those sites as they just lie in today’s india. Just like some Egyptian sites might be in countries to the south, north or west of Egypt but those countries can’t claim anything.

Why the hate for Bangladeshis? In the other thread you were claiming to love Bangladeshis.

where did I hate on Bangladesh, BANGLADESHI

and those sites are deep within India and are the well springs of Indian civilization...please claim what's in your border...

 

[Taimoor Khan]

from the paper:

The Iranian-related ancestry in the IVC derives from a lineage leading to early Iranian farmers, herders, and hunter gatherers before their ancestors separated, contradicting the hypothesis that the shared ancestry between early Iranians and South Asians reflects a large-scale spread of western Iranian farmers east. Instead, sampled ancient genomes from the Iranian plateau and IVC descend from different groups of hunter-gatherers who began farming without being connected by substantial movement of people.

Our evidence that the Iranian-related ancestry in the IVC Cline diverged from lineages leading to ancient Iranian hunter-gatherers, herders, and farmers prior to their ancestors’ separation places constraints on the spread of Iranian-related ancestry across the combined region of the Iranian plateau and South Asia, where it is represented in all ancient and modern genomic data sampled to date. The Belt Cave individual dates to 10,000 BCE, definitively before the advent of farming anywhere in Iran, which implies that the split leading to the Iranian-related component in the IVC Cline predates the advent of farming there as well…Thus, the Iranian-related ancestry in the IVC Cline descends from a different group of hunter-gatherers from the ancestors of the earliest known farmers or herders in the western Iranian plateau.

we never claim IVC ...we claim Lothal Rakhigarhi continuum...your screeching on the internet wont change that BANGLADESHI

As I said to you:

Why dont you lot first agree among yourself if the skeleton is off south Indian or local rajistani, Punjabi or Gujrati? LOL


That has been your whole point of argument. Savy??

 

[Bilal.]

where did I hate on Bangladesh, BANGLADESHI

and those sites are deep within India and are the well springs of Indian civilization...please claim what's in your border...

No they are not deep inside india, they are close areas to Pakistan. Deep would be somewhere far away from Pakistan. That further solidifies Pakistan’s sole claim on IVC.

 

[Juggernaut_Flat_Plane_V8]

As I said to you:

Why dont you lot first agree among yourself if the skeleton is off south Indian or local rajistani, Punjabi or Gujrati? LOL


That has been your whole point of argument. Savy??

the skeletons show broad similiarity to Indians both within the local area as well as broadly across India

 

[Bilal.]

As I said to you:

Why dont you lot first agree among yourself if the skeleton is off south Indian or local rajistani, Punjabi or Gujrati? LOL


That has been your whole point of argument. Savy??

Boy is thick.

 

[Juggernaut_Flat_Plane_V8]

No they are not deep inside india, they are close areas to Pakistan. Deep would be somewhere far away from Pakistan. That further solidifies Pakistan’s sole claim on IVC.

they are closer to Ganga than Indus...so please

 

[Bilal.]

they are closer to Ganga than Indus...so please

So? Roman sites can be found in Syria closer to Iraq than Italy. Should Iraq claim Roman legacy?

 

[Taimoor Khan]

the skeletons show broad similiarity to Indians both within the local area as well as broadly across India

LOL, what a south Indian got to do with north Indian? You are talking absolute non sense now.