You are absokutely wrong. Nominal and real are even clear from words that who is real representative of economic strength. For the sake of argument actual economic value lies in the product itself so for example if china has fuel valued at 1 rupee per liter and in USA fuel is being sold at 2 rupee per dollar and there is only consumption of 10 liter of fuel by both the economy then does this means USA economy is double of chinese despite usibg the same quantities of same good ?
Your argument has no economic sense or backing from any economic theory.
lol, how am I wrong? So, by saying I am wrong that mean you said
EVERY, I will say again,
EVERY Economist or Economic Policy, it doesn't matter anyone from the Fed looks at production as per their own currency and disregarding inflation? Sure, then go ahead and stop producing nominal number....
Because my point is it's depending on what you want to look at, Fed issue economic forecast based on Nominal number and issue interest rate and debt ceiling, because debt and interest rate (indirectly related) are unrelated to inflation, while organisation such as S&P and JP Morgan tend to looks at real value to issue forecast alert because that's the real value so that is a more clearer indication, say for example, for their credit rating, but that does not mean the Fed don't look at real value or PPP value or JP Morgan did not look at Nominal Value.
As for your question, does that means economy is double of China? Iin absolute term, yes, is relative term, no. That is like saying China have a better economic outlook because China has a better GDP growth rate than US, is it? Is it China grows at 5 or 7 or whatever % rather than the 2 or 3% of the US really mean that? You should know the answer.
I mean, since when did the health of an economy is being gauged by one factor and one factor alone? I don't know which school you went to or what type of economic sense you have or what economic theory you were taught, but if your point is Real GDP is more representative than nominal, then I would ask for my money back, because whoever taught you that is wrong, and that much I knew.