Gaza-Israel Conflict | October 2023
- Thread starter Trisolaran
- Start date
FuturePAF
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
- Messages
- 10,546
- Reaction score
- 24
- Country
- Location
The statute of limitations is when Al-Quds is freed because it’s not over till it’s overlol. Can I get my 15 minutes back?
Here's the worst part of this comedy show we just watched; they talked about the zionist intel committee releasing that 3-optioned plan which one of them was the main one about locating the Palestinians into tent cities in Sinai, right? I know you're hot on that.The details are irrelevant since it's never gonna happen and the other two options also insignificant since that was all they talked about for the rest of that show, but just that one option I'll entertain.
The dude then goes on to talk about Sisi and feels the need to add that the only reason Egypt has a good intelligence service of its own since they warned the zionists about the attack on October7 is because how could they not, after all, Sisi is a dictator! Zapadapadooo loool! Mind you, these little nuances set the tone, believe me.
Then they discussed why they thought it would never happen and their main reasoning was because Hitler the 2nd needs Hamas to create division between Gaza and the PA to weaken the likelihood of a two-state solution should the PA control Gaza as well. Then that chick went on about the Israeli people will be tired of war and want to push a peace plan for Palestinian statehood and be done with all the fighting etc. and so Hitler 2nd needs Hamas to sustain the friction which causes fighting and infighting which weakens the possibility of peace which then helps him gain the support of his hawkish, rightwing Nazi party. FIne.
Prior to that was all the floating of the "Sinai plan" to Blinken and the European Union and how they would think that it would be a war crime in the form of ethnic cleansing and so on and so forth. Then the real hammer falling on the anvil for me was that it would ignite a war from the "Arabs". Not once in that entire 15 minutes did either of them two bring up the MOST IMPORTANT factor - EGYPT!!! It was as if Egypt, the COUNTRY that SINAI BELONGS TO, HELLLLOOOOOOO, didn't matter one iota what IT thought? Just that Sisi is a dictator and whatever else they think of him, but it was as if it was a foregone conclusion that it was completely irrelevant to mention the fact that maybe, just maybe Sisi and the Egyptian people might have a small, teeny weeny saying in the matter of transferring 1 million Gazans to Sinai? Just a little? The shameless arrogance and lack of consideration displayed by those two geniuses and whatever network that is, is beyond me.
And on top of that, even just as important as Egypt having THE ULTIMATE SAYING in how ITS sovereignty MIGHT NOT BE NEGOTIABLE TO ANYONE, let alone to THE FRIGGIN EUROPEAN UNION and not even think of the Palestinians themselves? They wouldn't have a say in the matter of forcibly moving THEM to Egypt? lol. Just the fact these two didn't even have the wherewithal to mention the relevance of the two most important parties in that idiotic and impossible idea (let's call it what it is, a war crime) and didn't even consider mentioning what they might have to think or say or act about it just goes to show you how absurd this was. Not to mention the pathetic stupidity of it all.
Let's just say for the sake of discussion that they offered Sisi $300 trillion to locate 1 million Palestinians to Sinai and he traitored Egyptian sovereignty (which is what it would amount to).......not only would the 110 million Egyptians revolt against him and slice him up into pieces & throw them into the Nile, but every one of us, including infants in wombs would pick up arms and head to the zion border to fight for our sovereignty. That was the most important element they should've discussed, not the zionists politics or ambitions or feelings lol. Crazy.
BTW, when does the statute of limitation end for you holding me to the tent cities?
Very good analysis, and comes back to my original point that they (these hosts specifically but the west in general) don’t respect the autonomy/agency/interests of the Arab nations or their leaders. The lady is more respectful and seem to genuinely care for the regular people, but the guy seems to be a policy wonk not unlike Hillary Clinton, whom I’ve met and could see parallel with this guy; having no problem telling the masses what to do.
They see all these nations as “pliant regimes” that should operate within the boundaries expected of them by the U.S.
The guy actually lived for some time in a gulf Arab country and basically considers the GCC to be severely backwards (I don’t recall what exact wording he used, it was in a segment discussing the Biden-MBS relationship).
The surprise with this plan is not its sheer arrogance, which is par for the course coming from Israel, but the audacity that with the Carte Blanche being given by the west, how far it is expected to be taken seriously. 50 years ago, Kissinger came as a Secretary of State and didn’t mention his ethnic background, but Blinken starts with that. Basically the west sees the Arabs as two groups, the rich GCC willing to spend to no end in exchange for keeping all threats to their rule at bay, and the rest which are to muddle along (not unlike Pakistan) and ek out whatever living they can manage. Neither are to question that status quo and be ready to accommodate “because we give you aid”.
If there was ever a time for the Arabs to have common cause and stand up for their dignity, now would be it.
Mustang125
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- May 27, 2011
- Messages
- 871
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
If he or any Muslim got. 100 m than it’s a loss and a loss deal.
maverick1977
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2009
- Messages
- 4,477
- Reaction score
- -6
- Country
- Location
THis is hate speech. Islam has no problem with Jews...
Mehdipersian
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2022
- Messages
- 1,351
- Reaction score
- -4
- Country
- Location
We gave Yemen,Hezbullah, hamas,iraqi forces,...their missiles.
So it's not "only talking "
Also i hope we will see launch of missiles and drones from countries in this map against Israhell soon.
Total Destruction
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2015
- Messages
- 1,315
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
Even if we had meteors .. what it gonna do against hundreds of fighter jets?
We have a weapon which is suez canal.. deploy fuken sea mines.
We also near europe.. let the africans in millions cross our sea to reach them.
Not mutually exclusive. Hamas neutralised 300+ IDF soldiers in very impressive fashion. But the majority of the 1700 Israelis killed were not active combatants.
And your trolling and spreading of Zionist lies will continue to be rebutted.
Now you cite and believe IDF statements? Do you also believe the IDF when they say Palestinian rockets landed on the Christian hospital and Hamas beheaded 40 Jewish babies, or do you only believe their statements about Hezbollah?
PS. 120 casualties, not killed.
Those SCUD missiles came from existing Yemen Army supplies, not from Iran, and more importantly none of those have sufficient range to reach Israel.
The missile the Yemeni Resistance are using to strike Israel is called Toufan (Iranian Ghadr-F), they first displayed this to the world (and started using it) a few months ago, it was never used against Saudi Arabia and thus was not supplied to target Saudi Arabia.
Mustang125
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- May 27, 2011
- Messages
- 871
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
My Iranians brothers did and Allah will bless them for it. Just don’t be proud of it and lose your reward. Because Muslims are still getting bombed and losing their lives. I have no right whatsoever because my country isn’t doing Jack all. So when I expect more from people who already doing the don’t shoot the messenger
Falcon29
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2013
- Messages
- 31,647
- Reaction score
- -10
- Country
- Location
The Gaza division is a lot more than 300 people. Majority of Israeli casualties are combatants.
There's no trolling or lies. And you aren't rebutting anything. You are wasting your energy and time. You're a Hamas hater that wants to take credit for Hamas's work and wants them destoryed. I don't understand why you're here. This is a Hamas-led operation. With Hamas taking the toll and making the sacrifices. And Hamas planning and execution.
Let's see if Hezbollah has any shame and will join with Hamas.
Quite a bold claim. I hope it's correct, but we unfortunately have a lot of evidence to the contrary.
Posting a distorted image of Hezbollah's flag containing an Israeli tower is not trolling?
Everyone knows where Hamas gets its funding and weapons from, but Iran doesn't control how it uses them
I agree
Hezbollah liberated vast majority of Lebanon from Israeli occupation in 2000. You want them to liberate Palestine for you, too?
Similar threads
- Article
- Article
