Falcon29
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2013
- Messages
- 31,647
- Reaction score
- -10
- Country
- Location
This would be the single greatest act of terrorism of the century.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This would be the single greatest act of terrorism of the century.
They misfired on the parking lot (if it wasnt a hamas misfire).They bombed the Baptist Christian Hospital two days ago. They must not be allowed to commit the single greatest terrorist attack in the century.
Someone with background in military operations may chime in: This bombing by air, entering 3rd week, seems wasteful for a strip 25 miles by 5 miles. There can't too many 'strategic' targets anymore to waste those 'precision weapons'. Why don't they use artillery and at least target with more accuracy at lower cost? They can easily cover any point by lining up guns on the long side.Just my obs: but Israel is looking to drag this out for months if it has to.
They misfired on the parking lot (if it wasnt a hamas misfire).
Also Hamas just performed a 9/11 like terror attack before that. Does not stop you from seeing them as your “freedom heroes”?
But anyway. israel are not going to risk another misfire now, that will cost them all public support.
stupid f
This is my point.Someone with background in military operations may chime in: This bombing by air, entering 3rd week, seems wasteful for a strip 25 miles by 5 miles. There can't too many 'strategic' targets anymore to waste those 'precision weapons'. Why don't they use artillery and at least target with more accuracy at lower cost? They can easily cover any point by lining up guns on the long side.
A bit complex subject Marxism.Here is the problem...
With Marxism, the political and the economics are inextricable, meaning you cannot talk about one without the other. And if you somehow managed to separate them, you no longer have a Marxist system. See China.
But if you never engaged in Marxism, you can have the economy apart from the political, whether the political is from a dictatorship (see China), a monarchy which is also a dictatorship, or a democracy. Excesses in capitalism? See China. Does it mean excesses in capitalism does not exist in the US/West? Of course there is, but at least we do not deny it.
The point, going back to what Saddam Hussein said about US, is that sharing authority and power is unwanted to the point that it is unknown. Or %99 unknown. The idea that one branch of government can veto the desires of another is ancient like the Roman consuls who can challenge each other and the institutions approved it. Saddam Hussein simply cannot envision it.