What's new

Gandhi endorses allegations of war crimes against Sri Lanka

Of Course they said and it took 56 years for give them the citizenship .

Sri Lankans were very generous to give them citizenship. No other country would give citizenship to aliens en mass. There are no examples like that in recent history. Still Indians ask us why it took 56 years.

Nope .You are wrong .
Sinhalese didnt like Tamils in the SL history .Tamils was introduced in there by Brits for plantation jobs as labourers .Sinhalese couldnt agree with that .But they didnt do anything massively because of Brits.After independence (then it was Ceylon ) Sinhalese began to show their intolerance against Tamils .I have been read about their genocide atttempts during 60s .But India did intereferd in there .But SL themselves provoked us .
So our GoI supported tamil groups (bad policy).And still it remains as a problem.

What? Even the genetics show Sinhalese to have Tamil genes. Sinhalese respected Tamils when it was due. Sinhalese took Tamil women and gave Sinhalese women to Tamils. Elara was much respected Tamilian by a Sinhalese king. Sinhalese even took Tamils as their own king during the Kandyan era. What are you smoking?

Moreover Sinhalese had no problem with the plantation Tamils. The only issue was how to assimilate them in to Sri Lankan society. I think what you've heard about is the riots in 1958. It was instigated by the Tamils. India did nothing then.
 
Indira's couldnt complete her mission .She had been kicked out from PMO.
AFAIK ,with my limited knowledge Indira was not in power in 1977 .It was Janta party under Morarji Desai which almost destroyed our intelligence assets .

Doesn't matter what was Indian reaction for the 1971 incident until 1977?


Mam .I know about Tamilians they are our own people and TN is my neighbouring state .I have seen a lots of Tamils . So we know them .
Why did that Bengalis protested for independence from Pakistan ?Because West Pakistan forces tortured and raped them.
Same things happened to the Tamils in SL they faced a lots from Sinhalese .So they created various groups like PLOTE ,LTTE .Except LTTE all others are destroyed either by SL or most time by Indian forces .
Our Govt supported LTTE which we still believes as a wrong policy .

All these are stories of 80s and 70's when India was nothing and was always under the protection of USSR .
But now things are changed ,a lots .Now we know how to secure our strategic security and geopolitical interests .
Look at the Nepal ,after all those crying and whining they cam on our own way .We knows and they also knows that was a wrong policy which they dragged India's name in their petty issue .

What about Sinhalese? Aren't they your own? Even genetics shows Tamils and Sinhalese are related?
 
The mutual antipathy between the Sinhalese and Tamils is several thousand years old e.g. Ram v Ravan. It's not surprising that the Sinhalese chose to convert to Buddhism given how Ravan is depicted in Hindu beliefs.
 
The mutual antipathy between the Sinhalese and Tamils is several thousand years old e.g. Ram v Ravan. It's not surprising that the Sinhalese chose to convert to Buddhism given how Ravan is depicted in Hindu beliefs.

Sri Lanka has nothing to do with Ram-Ravan epic. Please spare Sri Lanka of it.
 
Sri Lanka has nothing to do with Ram-Ravan epic. Please spare Sri Lanka of it.

Actually there are lots of people in Sinhalese regard Ravan as a hero, the traditional Indian version of the story as false, and that Ravan was avenging his sister Surpanakha, whose nose was mutilated by Lakshman, the brother of Ram.
 
Actually there are lots of people in Sinhalese regard Ravan as a hero, the traditional Indian version of the story as false, and that Ravan was avenging his sister Surpanakha, whose nose was mutilated by Lakshman, the brother of Ram.

Yes. Those people are fools. Sri Lanka has no association with Ramayana. This whole Ravana worship stuff is pretty recent one.
 
Sri Lankans were very generous to give them citizenship. No other country would give citizenship to aliens en mass. There are no examples like that in recent history. Still Indians ask us why it took 56 years.



What? Even the genetics show Sinhalese to have Tamil genes. Sinhalese respected Tamils when it was due. Sinhalese took Tamil women and gave Sinhalese women to Tamils. Elara was much respected Tamilian by a Sinhalese king. Sinhalese even took Tamils as their own king during the Kandyan era. What are you smoking?

Moreover Sinhalese had no problem with the plantation Tamils. The only issue was how to assimilate them in to Sri Lankan society. I think what you've heard about is the riots in 1958. It was instigated by the Tamils. India did nothing then.


We also gave a lot of citizenship to Tibetan refugees and other foreigners in our nation .All it takes just 7 years not 56 years .
@Mr.Meap I hope now you can understand the situation


Why should we ?That was none of our business .
Of course issue caused the loss of thousands of people .4 Eelam civil wars, so much for assimilation .So leave it in there.

Doesn't matter what was Indian reaction for the 1971 incident until 1977?




What about Sinhalese? Aren't they your own? Even genetics shows Tamils and Sinhalese are related?


Indira did get enough time for dealing .It took a lots of years to develop assets and counter ops .

I dont care what genetics say about it .But Tamils are our brothers , an important part of our nation.I was talking about them.
 
We also gave a lot of citizenship to Tibetan refugees and other foreigners in our nation .All it takes just 7 years not 56 years .
@Mr.Meap I hope now you can understand the situation

China didn't brought Tibetans forcefully and placed them in location of China's choosing. Did they? India let them in and then settled them in places which are suitable. Sri Lanka didn't have such a luxury.

Why should we ?That was none of our business .
Of course issue caused the loss of thousands of people .4 Eelam civil wars, so much for assimilation .So leave it in there.

India had numerous civil wars and some are still continuing. Does that mean there are no minority assimilation in India?

Indira did get enough time for dealing .It took a lots of years to develop assets and counter ops .

I dont care what genetics say about it .But Tamils are our brothers , an important part of our nation.I was talking about them.

What? Arming some gangsters need years or planning ? Are you nuts? What kind of assets did India develop for LTTE?

What Tamils are you referring? Tamilnadu or Sri Lankan? How come Sri Lankan Tamils are of your concern? It's non of your business too.
 
We also gave a lot of citizenship to Tibetan refugees and other foreigners in our nation .All it takes just 7 years not 56 years .
@Mr.Meap I hope now you can understand the situation


Why should we ?That was none of our business .
Of course issue caused the loss of thousands of people .4 Eelam civil wars, so much for assimilation .So leave it in there.




Indira did get enough time for dealing .It took a lots of years to develop assets and counter ops .

I dont care what genetics say about it .But Tamils are our brothers , an important part of our nation.I was talking about them.

India needs to gain trust of Sri Lanka through co-operation, and partnership, on equal footing.
That's that, you would've wanted the same for India. No?.
 
China didn't brought Tibetans forcefully and placed them in location of China's choosing. Did they? India let them in and then settled them in places which are suitable. Sri Lanka didn't have such a luxury.



India had numerous civil wars and some are still continuing. Does that mean there are no minority assimilation in India?



What? Arming some gangsters need years or planning ? Are you nuts? What kind of assets did India develop for LTTE?

What Tamils are you referring? Tamilnadu or Sri Lankan? How come Sri Lankan Tamils are of your concern? It's non of your business too.
India also didnt forced Tamils to stay there .If something like that happened before 1947 we just dont care .Perhaps it was British or some other Kings .AFAIK Republic of India didnt forced any Tamils in there .


Name some civil wars that can be equated with Eelam wars . Which civil war affected the entire India like that happened in SL .?

Decision making will take years .And after 1971 ,Indira entangled due to domestic politics and judicial process.From 1971 to 73 it was Bangladesh political solution
.1974 Peaceful nuclear test also caused a lot of attention .Then 1975 to 1977 she had to deal with national emergency.
If Tamils in India have relation with SL tamils it is also our business .SL refugees is still in here also.
.

India needs to gain trust of Sri Lanka through co-operation, and partnership, on equal footing.
That's that, you would've wanted the same for India. No?.

Of Course all those elements are important to us .But national security is the prime concern.
Except that we dont interested with anything happening in there.
 
Of Course all those elements are important to us .But national security is the prime concern.
Except that we dont interested with anything happening in there.
Of course, have a nice day. Sri Lanka will become a threat if you force it to, otherwise it's a peaceful nation, which should be be at peace, for as long as it can be.
 
Of course, have a nice day. Sri Lanka will become a threat if you force it to, otherwise it's a peaceful nation, which should be be at peace, for as long as it can be.

And they also can live peacefully if they dont try to play games with our national security
 
This is a pathetic excuse the justification of arming the LTTE and other similar organizations. India had no enemity towards Sri Lanka till 1977. It all changed when JRJ came to power in Sri Lanka. Indira personally had a grudge towards JRJ and India was afraid of JRJ's Westernized policy. Therefore the backing of the proxy groups in Sri Lanka was not a retaliation to the 1971.

Lol. Indian animosity started right after 1971, even though there was some friction before when Lanka attempted to send Lankan Tamils to India along with Indian Tamils.
The Pakistani submarine, refueled and stocked in Colombo, had sunk itself during the laying of mines. And that proved to be lucky to Indian Naval ships and to Lanka. If that Sub had sunk even one ship, next thing would have been invasion of Lanka and separate country for tamils.
Lucky Lankans.
 
LTTE even killed unborn children. Why the heck the Ghandi guy concerned of Prabha's son? Are Sinhalese children lesser important than Prabha's son?

India was hoping to use the kid against Sri Lanka when he grows up. That route is now effectively closed. Feel bad for the kid.
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom