What's new

Future snapshot of PakTurk military cooperation.

lch_comparison-page-001-jpg.153659

lch-mission-configs-png.152870
viW18qa.jpg
LCH%2BLight%2BCombat%2BHelicoptor%2B-%2BLCH%2BIndia.jpg
5a130c114c91e6a829cdc1390a0ffabb.jpg
lch2-jpg.152060
lch2-jpg.152060


Courtesy : @sancho and @Water Car Engineer



But did you realizing, you made an argument, not them.

Did you just post a pic of a CGI from 2010 or something?:lol: the grey pic?
 
.
Not much difference between the a-129 and lch apart from the fact that LCH lacks millimetre wave radar while A-129 has it.

Rest is debatable.

Lch is a commendable effort by india and even though major sub systems are imported it still was designed in india with lot of indian sub systems.

On the other hand pakistanis should only laugh at india if A-129 was even assembled in pakistan,,let alone designed here.

So please make the discussion civil.

Did you just post a pic of a CGI from 2010 or something?:lol: the grey pic?

Its fairly accurate,,stop giggling for once and see whats right.
 
. .
That I say the same thing about T129. :lol:.

No you just claimed it matched T-129 and was ahead in other areas? And I'm sticking to the fact that T-129 is superior to your "LCH".. Hard to digest that isn't it?

Dont delude yourself, I am nowhere said T129 is inferior to LCH.
 
.
Not much difference between the a-129 and lch apart from the fact that LCH lacks millimetre wave radar while A-129 has it.

Rest is debatable.

Lch is a commendable effort by india and even though major sub systems are imported it still was designed in india with lot of indian sub systems.

On the other hand pakistanis should only laugh at india if A-129 was even assembled in pakistan,,let alone designed here.

So please make the discussion civil.



Its fairly accurate,,stop giggling for once and see whats right.

Can Pak with T-129 can fight in Kargil or Siachen? If no, then how I believe LCH is inferior.
 
.
Can Pak with T-129 can fight in Kargil or Siachen? If no, then how I believe LCH is inferior.

Thats correct,,LCH has a ceiling of 6500 m which is superior to most of the choppers.
 
.
Atleast quote correctly. @DESERT FIGHTER.

And yes, I said that in some area, again in "some area" LCH is much ahead. Prove me wrong.
 
. .
Can Pak with T-129 can fight in Kargil or Siachen? If no, then how I believe LCH is inferior.

Why would we use helis in siachin or kargil ? When things like "jets" armed with "PGMs" are available ? "Choppers" will be used in "anti tank" roles.. Or fighting insurgents..,providing cover fire to troops on grounds ...

Range? T-129
Speed? T-129
Avionics and sensors ? T-129
Armaments ? T129
HMS? T-129
Radar? T-129

:)

Not much difference between the a-129 and lch apart from the fact that LCH lacks millimetre wave radar while A-129 has it.

Rest is debatable.

Lch is a commendable effort by india and even though major sub systems are imported it still was designed in india with lot of indian sub systems.

On the other hand pakistanis should only laugh at india if A-129 was even assembled in pakistan,,let alone designed here.

So please make the discussion civil.
Haha.. It's T-129 which has 2 variants A and B we are talking about .. As for laughing why would I ? It's a good development for india.. I'm kinda jealous .. But does that mean it's inferior the to a chopper a country like Turkey is producing ? The same country that is also producing world class systems,Tanks,com systems,F-16s,F-35s and now Indigenous or local variants of Black Hawk ? Nope ..

And yes Turkiye has offered us local production .. The problem ? Is "da money"..

Its fairly accurate,,stop giggling for once and see whats right.

Nope not really ..:lol:

Looks like he ran away from the field:rolleyes:

Chawala I'm using my iPhone .. So it does take a little longer to reply..
 
.
Haha.. It's T-129 which has 2 variants A and B we are talking about .. As for laughing why would I ? It's a good development for india.. I'm kinda jealous .. But does that mean it's inferior the to a chopper a country like Turkey is producing ? The same country that is also producing world class systems,Tanks,com systems,F-16s,F-35s and now Indigenous or local variants of Black Hawk ? Nope ..

And yes Turkiye has offered us local production .. The problem ? Is "da money"..

Its not a 100% turkish project ,,,,just want to let u know,,they too are using majority of systems sourced from foreign vendors too.

Chawala I'm using my iPhone .. So it does take a little longer to reply..

Better get android,,,not cool to be an isheep in this day and age:P
 
.
another dick measuring contest :lol: :lol:

the irony is that non of the said choppers are in service especially LCH .

no one here is an analyst and we are all "enthusiasts" , and mostly are just mere cyber warriors .

those copters are not battle tested , are not even in service (T-129 is in limited service for further tests) .

india is acting alone in design and testing whereas the T-129 is being developed by one of the most renown companies in regards to heli production . the Anglo-italian AgustaWestland company .

and the only way we can compare these two , is that if the exact specs are analysed by independent analysts and are battle tested .

so please ..... don't screw every single thread ....

MIG-29 Vs F-16 ..... F-22 Vs T-50 ....... and so forth
 
.
Why would we use helis in siachin or kargil ? When things like "jets" armed with "PGMs" are available ? "Choppers" will be used in "anti tank" roles.. Or fighting insurgents..,providing cover fire to troops on grounds ...

Range? T-129
Speed? T-129
Avionics and sensors ? T-129
Armaments ? T129
HMS? T-129
Radar? T-129

:)


.
LCH+Poster.jpg


here, now give me specs of T129 and tell me where LCH is inferior.
 
.
another dick measuring contest :lol: :lol:

the irony is that non of the said choppers are in service especially LCH .

no one here is an analyst and we are all "enthusiasts" , and mostly are just mere cyber warriors .

those copters are not battle tested , are not even in service (T-129 is in limited service for further tests) .

india is acting alone in design and testing whereas the T-129 is being developed by one of the most renown companies in regards to heli production . the Anglo-italian AgustaWestland company .

and the only way we can compare these two , is that if the exact specs are analysed by independent analysts and are battle tested .

so please ..... don't screw every single thread ....

MIG-29 Vs F-16 ..... F-22 Vs T-50 ....... and so forth

Main difference is millimetre wave radar in A-129,rest is almost comparable.
Pointless to compare the two,,we will never know.
 
.
LCH+Poster.jpg


here, now give me specs of T129 and tell me where LCH is inferior.

What's so special ? Perhaps you didn't see the profile @Hakan posted? Now coming back to the real deal... You are acting like a fan boy... Compare the actual systems used on the platforms? Speed,range, etc as I pointed out before are owned by T-129..(unless you didn see that aswell)..:)
 
.
What's so special ? Perhaps you didn't see the profile @Hakan posted? Now coming back to the real deal... You are acting like a fan boy... Compare the actual systems used on the platforms? Speed,range, etc as I pointed out before are owned by T-129..(unless you didn see that aswell)..:)

Lol. bro, I can same say about T129. What so special?
ok, I think you have understanding problem
atak-4-jpg.163477

LCH+Poster.jpg


Now tell me where is inferior?
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom