You're not making any sense. You cannot prove neither can you disprove that Harappans have a DNA connections to modern day Pakistanis. So why do you insist so much that Pakistanis DO NOT have a connection to the Harappans without any credible eveidence?
Because the history is that of the land, NOT your people, and certainly NOT that of present day Pakistanis.
So when you try to peddle your lies and create some revisionist history to massage your low self esteem and lack of achievements, it is our responsibility to correct such propaganda.
And mind you, this is not restricted to you. There are many Indians who are dumb enough to say stupid things like Taj Mahal was a temple and other unbelievable nonsense. So they are equal jokers who are laughed at and become an embarrassment to their people. I wouldn't shy away from calling them out either.
It seems you want to be labelled the Pakistani equivalent of those Indian idiots is it?
The Harappan civilsation was located in what is now modern day Pakistan. It did not consist of ALL the other parts of india which were seperate states and not a part of a unified india as it is now (post 1947). So indians can't make a claim to it.
Many of the IVC sites are located in present day India.
Rakhigharee being one of many, so we do have a vested interest in the right version of history.
So if you want to limit it to the history of land and a shared history of the subcontinent, be my guest. I support this.
Any monopoly and Delete repeated word on history will be met with similar responses.
The Turkish conquest of Constaninople was a series of conquests of that region by many different European powers that changed hands many time. It's just that the Turks have held it the longest thats all. There is no similarity between them and Pakistan/Harappa. For the most part, Turks, Greeks, Italians and other Mediterranean people have FAR more in common with one anither than Pakistanis do with indians.
You've got to be kidding me! After acting like you're some expert on history, you should know this much that Pakistan was the first land to fall in any invasion in the subcontinent. Literally everyone from Greeks, to Mongols to Indians (of present day India) and Turks had at some point conquered and pillaged those lands.
So the analogy is perfectly apt. The audience here is wrong since you don't know the history of your own lands.
PS With regards to scientific achievements, it's pathetic that 1.3 billion indians have to rely on the white nations (who are lesser in number than indians) for their advanced sciences, expertise and technologies. Explain this pathetic situation and then I will explain the scientific achievements of Pakistan.
But I thought we were poor,low IQ, malnutritioned, open defecating ugly people. No one expects anything from us!
BUT on your own admission Pakistanis are better in every aspect than India. So what's your excuse?!
That you're not interested in science and techology? Inbreeding perhaps? lol
Give me break fella. I can sense you have no responses, which is why the classic deflection tactics. You're too predictable!
Certainly right there. Just like a nuclear weapons program............
[/QUOTE]
Wait what? Where's your evidence for this? As for the Harappa DNA business, DNA doesn't radically change in a few thousand years, unless there was complete population displacement. No such thing happened in Pakistan nor are there any records for it. Present day Pakistanis share 50-60% of their genes with the rest of India. I put up generic study on the other thread. For your claim to be true, Pakistanis would at least have to be over 60% different from other Indians.
My claim is that in order for one to draw ancestry from the Harrapans, one would require DNA samples to corroborate.
Since no such evidence or sample exists, one cannot make a claim of direct ancestry.
Besides, we have no idea what happened to the IVC and its people.
Did they migrate, did they perish, did they get mixed into a migrating tribe? Again, all theories!
So how are people so confiedent of drawing ancestral links which can be traced, through either:
1. DNA
2. Culture
3. Language
4. Religion and its effects on Culture
5. Written Script.
Since we know NONE of the above about the Harappans or an equivalent trace of the same in present day Pakistanis, where is even the question of genetic links?
My objection is to monopolizing history to one people or region. I'm simply trying to dispel such notions that seem to be rampant on PDF these days.
Wait what? Where's your evidence for this? As for the Harappa DNA business, DNA doesn't radically change in a few thousand years, unless there was complete population displacement. No such thing happened in Pakistan nor are there any records for it. Present day Pakistanis share 50-60% of their genes with the rest of India. I put up generic study on the other thread. For your claim to be true, Pakistanis would at least have to be over 60% different from other Indians.
So what's your theory on what happened to the people of the IVC?
indians are not. That accolade goes to the West, Russia and China, not the indian race
