What's new

Freedom of Speech in Pakistan

The fact is in the west, order and economic prosperity has been achieved by creating a largely constructed 'artificial' homegeneity and their media reflects the suffocating convergence of political thought. Iran is pretty well evil in every western media and Israel a victim even it is displayed often as a rude victim.

This suffocoating homogeneity merely reflects the consolidation of the entire western economic system by one order. To be able to operate you have to survive and feed on the oxygen provided by this economic order. This means all media houses in west are broadly owned by groups/individuals that are part of the same capitalist elite. So all you get from them is differant perspective of the same product. Politics reflects that. Take USA. A country of 300 million people yet politics has been mincedmeated into two narrow funnels each of which has divergence of a hair thickness. Republicans/Democrats.

Now compare Pakistan. PTM, MQM, PTI, ANP, JFL, TTP and more with views so divegent that it's like one are on Mars, other on Saturn, other on Pluto and your trying to get them to work together. The media in Pakistan reflects this conflict.

Are you suggesting that Pakistan must enforce this "artificial suffocating homogeneity" over the media to emulate the Western model of economic success by forcing a convergence of political thought? Is that a sufficient premise?
 
.
Are you suggesting that Pakistan must enforce this "artificial suffocating homogeneity" over the media to emulate the Western model of economic success by forcing a convergence of political thought? Is that a sufficient premise?
Yes absolutely, good for the goose, good for the gander. There is limited chance of success unless Pakistan adopts western models. And note there are two western models in my book -

  • western capitalism with it's differant permutations like USA, UK, Japan, South Korea etc
  • western socialism with it's differant permutations like CCP in China etc
Both originate from western thought.
 
.
Yes absolutely, good for the goose, good for the gander. There is limited chance of success unless Pakistan adopts western models. And note there are two western models in my book -

  • western capitalism with it's differant permutations like USA, UK, Japan, South Korea etc
  • western socialism with it's differant permutations like CCP in China etc
Both originate from western thought.

But first we need to establish the premise you put forth above as being correct and sufficient: imposing an artificial suffocating homogeneity over the media made the Western economic success.
 
.
Here posters criticze army and government all the time and blame army for everything
and no one of them got killed but are still crying about freedom of speech
 
.
Here posters criticze army and government all the time and blame army for everything
and no one of them got killed but are still crying about freedom of speech

The government, and the Army, are not above criticism, and deservedly so.
 
.
The government, and the Army, are not above criticism, and deservedly so.
And people(I mean lifafas common Pakistanis love army) are allowed to criticize but I think no one should be allowed to criticize army
 
.
And people(I mean lifafas common Pakistanis love army) are allowed to criticize but I think no one should be allowed to criticize army

As long as the Army does not behave in an illegal or extra-Constitutional manner, it must be respected for attending to its assigned duties.
 
.
As long as the Army does not behave in an illegal or extra-Constitutional manner, it must be respected for attending to its assigned duties.
What is constitution? a book written by politicians
Pakistanis don't care about this book and love army
 
Last edited:
. .
imposing an artificial suffocating homogeneity over the media made the Western economic success.
It did not make it. It was product of western societies going through process of homogenization post 1500s. Take USA. 100s of differant migrant ethnic groups speaking differant languages, differant religions, from across the globe that make Pakistan look boring have been melded around the original English settlers, pressure pumped through a meat grinder and you get the modern American. And then consolidated along and into two very similiar political vehicles - democrats and reoublicans.

love army
Which is just Britishism planted on Pakistani soil by English conquerors.
 
.
It did not make it. It was product of western societies going through process of homogenization post 1500s. Take USA. 100s of differant migrant ethnic groups speaking differant languages, differant religions, from across the globe that make Pakistan look boring have been melded around the original English settlers, pressure pumped through a meat grinder and you get the modern American. And then consolidated along and into two very similiar political vehicles - democrats and reoublicans.

So the economic miracle came first due to a national ethos, and homogeneity was imposed later on the media?
 
.
our media is not curbed it barks against Pakistans interest day and night issue is people dont care much if media hurts Pakistan but go crazy when they talk about Armed forces and our Army being very careful about its imagine strictly deals with such media outlets i am not saying media should be allowed yo bark against army all the time but objective criticism should be allowed and if army goes out of their domain media or people have every right to discuss it! without being labeled traitor!
 
. .
So the economic miracle came first due to a national ethos, and homogeneity was imposed later on the media?
When the national ethos was built up there was little in the form of media and what there was only reflected narrow interests of the elite and you should know that. Mass media is recent phenomenon. And your now being obtuse because I know your not ignorant.

All of the Pakistan army soldiers are Pakistanis
So are the corrupt PML-N, Nawaz clan, PPP, Bhutto-Zardari clan etc

*Britishism - the history, the orgins and institutional formation of PA is from the British Raj. It was formed from putatively British Raj regiments dating back to 1880s etc. Find out who the first chief was. PMA Kakul was established by a British officer, modelled on RMC Sandhurst etc.
 
.
So are the corrupt PML-N, Nawaz clan, PPP, Bhutto-Zardari clan etc

*Britishism - the history, the orgins and institutional formation of PA is from the British Raj. It was formed from putatively British Raj regiments dating back to 1880s etc. Find out who the first chief was. PMA Kakul was established by a British officer, modelled on RMC Sandhurst etc.
I know that Pakistan was also created by British
are you saying we should hate it because it was created by British?

BTW our Punjab police was also created by British but no one loves it
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom