France to supply key technology for BrahMos

[cirr]

cx-1, yj-18, yj-12 all are in development, none for them are in operational. P-1000 Vulkan(2.5) is not as fast as brahmos(2.8-3). 3M-54 Klub won't even fly in supersonic through its entair flight path. only in terminal phase. india also use Klub missiles.

In development？

What do you think China's 052D DDGs（over 10 commissioned or under construction）use for anti-ship missions？

What do you think China's JH-7A/B and J-16 fighter bombers use for anti-ship missions？

For your information，the YJ-12 is 4+4 in Chinese parlance，meaning Mach 4 range 400km。

CX-1，which is superior to Brahmos in both speed and range，is NOT considered good enough for the PLA and hence designated for export。

Brahmos is good only in the eyes and minds of Indians。

It is high time to make your OWN Brahmos or whatever，not replying on Russian inputs now and French in the future。

 

[special operation]

In development？

What do you think China's 052D DDGs（over 10 commissioned or under construction）use for anti-ship missions？

What do you think China's JH-7A/B and J-16 fighter bombers use for anti-ship missions？

For your information，the YJ-12 is 4+4 in Chinese parlance，meaning Mach 4 range 400km。

CX-1，which is superior to Brahmos in both speed and range，is NOT considered good enough for the PLA and hence designated for export。

Brahmos is good only in the eyes and minds of Indians。

It is high time to make your OWN Brahmos or whatever，not replying on Russian inputs now and French in the future。

lol... you chinese are good in advisement. CX-1 is cheap copy of russian P-800 Oniks. no even comparable to the sophisticated brahmos.

 

[Sinnerman108]

Its already world fastest and most advanced cruise missile.

Hahahaha

It is the best missile in the world.

But, it needs technology from France. Because .........................

hindu-stani ...

 

[punit]

because Russian send the prototype without a guidance system. So Modi rush to France and bought 36 Rafael in haste with the condition to sell Guidance system French though they should provide it to them because if they ever fire one towards China 90% chances it might come to Europe given the reliability of Indian Missiles shown in tests.

damn we should have bought Babar !

In development？

What do you think China's 052D DDGs（over 10 commissioned or under construction）use for anti-ship missions？

What do you think China's JH-7A/B and J-16 fighter bombers use for anti-ship missions？

For your information，the YJ-12 is 4+4 in Chinese parlance，meaning Mach 4 range 400km。

CX-1，which is superior to Brahmos in both speed and range，is NOT considered good enough for the PLA and hence designated for export。

Brahmos is good only in the eyes and minds of Indians。

It is high time to make your OWN Brahmos or whatever，not replying on Russian inputs now and French in the future。

yes just like fully indigenous chinese carrier !

 

[Donatello]

Can some of the Indian members explain why there is a need to upgrade the existing internal guidance system?

Is this more related to internal guidance integration with Rafales?

Sir a better question would be that since Brahmos is an indegenous development, why does it need French help? Afterall, India was that unique country with a hypersonic missile.

 

[Azz Kikr]

Hahahaha

It is the best missile in the world.

But, it needs technology from France. Because .........................

hindu-stani ...

its the best thats why it does not need anything, worry about your own chinese M9, M11 and no dong missiles named gori, gajni or whatever

It is one of the fastest ones, not definitely the fastest.

which other operational platform is faster that it, kindly enlighten.

 

[Akasa]

All are supersonic only in there terminal phase

The YJ-12 and CX-1 are supersonic throughout their entire flight profiles.

Having a dual sub- and supersonic flight regime allows for the missile to choose between various targets, make decisions, while retaining its high-speed dash to evade certain countermeasures.

 

[Sinnerman108]

its the best thats why it does not need anything, worry about your own chinese M9, M11 and no dong missiles named gori, gajni or whatever



which other operational platform is faster that it, kindly enlighten.

Our jobs is to keep putting our missile up ..

Its you guys who usually get your Dhooti in a tangle !

I dunno why are you getting worked up ... Hindu-stani women are very appreciative of our missiles.

 

[Akasa]

cx-1, yj-18, yj-12 all are in development, none for them are in operational. P-1000 Vulkan(2.5) is not as fast as brahmos(2.8-3). 3M-54 Klub won't even fly in supersonic through its entair flight path. only in terminal phase. india also use Klub missiles.

CX-1 have been cleared for export, indicating that its development has concluded.

Both the YJ-12 and YJ-18 are in service, aboard the H-6G bombers (for the YJ-12), the Type 093B submarine (YJ-18), and Type 052D destroyer (YJ-18).

I indicated that these systems are in the same speed bracket as the BrahMos, meaning that their speeds are similar and may not exactly be that of the BrahMos (Vulkan and Klub falls into this category).

lol... you chinese are good in advisement. CX-1 is cheap copy of russian P-800 Oniks. no even comparable to the sophisticated brahmos.

Nope; there are a great deal of differences, even aesthetically, between the CX-1 and BrahMos. Take a careful look at the intakes and dimensions.

 

[special operation]

Nope; there are a great deal of differences, even aesthetically, between the CX-1 and BrahMos. Take a careful look at the intakes and dimensions.

a slight modification.. that don't mean it not a copy.

 

[Akasa]

a slight modification.. that don't mean it not a copy.

By the same token, sharing a few similarities in outward appearance is not indicative of reverse engineering.

 

[special operation]

By the same token, sharing a few similarities in outward appearance is not indicative of reverse engineering.

shearing almost all tech features indicates reverse engineering

 

[Akasa]

shearing almost all tech features indicates reverse engineering

It indicates form following function, not reverse engineering.

 

[Levina]

Can some of the Indian members explain why there is a need to upgrade the existing internal guidance system?

Is this more related to internal guidance integration with Rafales?

I saw some reasons online

1)

2) somehow it could be related to the French ASMPA which is said to be similar to BrahMos @Gabriel92

3)

I could be wrong though.
@OrionHunter

 

[Azz Kikr]

Our jobs is to keep putting our missile up ..

Its you guys who usually get your Dhooti in a tangle !

I dunno why are you getting worked up ... Hindu-stani women are very appreciative of our missiles.

`lol..... pathetic liars pakistanis, even Hindustani rats are not afraid of your "made in china" missile, who knows if all of them crash land in arab sea during test and you call it success. our missiles are guided by ring laser gyroscope and can even pierce pakistani ***holes with great presicion