prashantazazel
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2014
- Messages
- 2,169
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
No one cares that the parents force religion on their children at an early age, thus brainwashing them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bringing drugs, weapons and signs inciting violence is undesirable behaviour.
Using your appearance to apply group pressure is equally undesirable behaviour.
No difference.
You can’t keep a coherent thought. Noone bans the thought. What is banned is infringing the rights if others by group pressure. A strawman.
Children are protected against the abuse of their parents.
Noone is telling them not to go to school. They can certainly remain Muslim in any type if clothes.
Again a strawman.
Why don't all Muslims who have have a problem just move to Saudi and Dubai? Then you can larp as Arabs all you want. You are like a square peg in a round hole in the west. Your refusal to integrate in what is a generously all encompassing homogenous western culture is a deal breaker. Your values and culture are not compatible, this is the unfortunate truth. Just go to the desert and you won't no longer need to feel the odd one out.
You said it: "equally undesirable behavior." So, you're literally equating how people dress to literally "guns, weapons and signs inciting violence." Thanks for exposing your racist inclinations, it's the most honest thing you've said up to this point. Okay, why don't you go to a hospital ward and ask a patient who's overdosed what's worse -- their drugs, or some random brown girl wearing an abaya?
So by regulating the dress code, you (the majority) are infringing the rights of a minority with state-backed legal pressure. You're literally doing what you're accusing the ones wearing hijab or abaya of -- you don't see it, or choose not to admit to it because you're racist.
That is forcing religion on an individual. You have a problem separating opinions from abuse. Dress codes are not forcing religion on someone.If I tell an atheist they can't attend school without taking part in Jummah prayer, then it means that I'm denying them their right to education unless they practice what I practice. I'm denying the atheist their right to not recognize a deity. It's the same in this situation.
If there are Muslim children who see that abiding by Islam's dress code is a religious practice, you're telling them, "you either come to school, or you stay at home practicing your faith." By attacking the abaya, you're systematically attacking what Muslims view as a religious practice, hence, their religion.
You are not allowed to wear ”conspicuous” religious symbols so large crucifixes are banned.Are they banning the crucifix as well i do hope so
you ban everything in France Islamic that some senator gets a bee in their bonnet about, no matter what it is.
It's basically a long dress. After causing a fuss last year about cropped tops, now no long dresses (the amaya is not a veil or headscarf). Why so much policing of girls' clothes? How about worrying about a lack of funding and other more pressing issues in your french schools?
Then tell the kids they're free to choose if they want or don't want to wear it at school. Instead, the state is enforcing a dress code by banning the attire associated with a religious group. It's obvious to every sane mind that state-backed discrimination is at play.The dress code stops parents from infringing the rights of their kids and other kids.
Yeah, and France is forcing secularism on the individual. You can't have it both ways. You can't say, "Everyone is free to decide..." and then say, "No, you're not free to wear religious attire in school." Maybe you're failing to understand that secularism is also a normative position, i.e., a reference point individuals and/or society use to decide what's right and wrong.That is forcing religion on an individual. You have a problem separating opinions from abuse. Dress codes are not forcing religion on someone.
Why do you keep equating examples of violence and murder with abaya (aka overcoat)? Is your life filled with drugs, guns, signs of violence and pagan sacrifice rituals or something? Lol.The pagan religious practice is to sacrifice infidels. According to your logic, cutting Blood Eagles on the back of Muslims is fully acceptable.
We happen to believe otherwise.
No freedom to practice religion?They are not enforcing a dress code. They are stopping religions from using group pressure to enforce religious clothing on kids.
They actually succeeded by creating sects and heretical groups like barelwis, qadianis, etc.The English tried every thing to get rid of Islam during colonial rule including the concept of “burning the Quran” .. they failed
As it the one religion that stipulates human rights every thing from freeing of slaves , right of divorce , rules of inheritance, treatment of parents etc
You people never liked the concept of universal human rights
You can practice religion starked naked. Dress has nothing to do with your beliefs.No freedom to practice religion?
You can practice religion starked naked. Dress has nothing to do with your beliefs.
I'm Greek so my "scum armies" were under Ottoman control back then.
so if you cant see a women's curves she does not exists ?
Western people want to see women naked so you force them to be naked
you are the same people who are happy to promote your daughters to do only fans
proud fathers you lot are
Are you implying the French are trying to convert Muslims by not allowing the abaya in schools and universities?Great, how do you feel about ottomans trying to convert you guys to Islam back then?
Are you implying the French are trying to convert Muslims by not allowing the abaya in schools and universities?