You must be very busy then whenever you visit PDF, correcting a hell lot of posters, and I would assume as you are fond of truth so lot of Indian posters too would have been corrected by you?
Actually, yes. In fact most of the posters I have tried to correct and argued with are Indians. You can check my posting history, if you want to know. I do my best to point out incorrect statements, no matter who makes them. Unlike you, I don't check their flags before doing so.
Or badmouthing and lies against Pakistan are acceptable? And in majority of cases Islam too?
Actually I did not bother to pick a fight with Pakistanis badmouthing Indians. I only pointed out to you that a lot of them have done that, since you were telling me that this is your "domestic issue". I wanted to know why you didn't tell that to Pakistanis who unnecessarily talked about India on this thread.
There is nothing to be gained by scolding people for obscenity or badmouthing. I did not say anything when one Pakistani called us "Indian turds". But there is something to be gained by correcting mistaken assertions. That is what I was doing in the post you first responded to.
Why would I want to know your faith or discuss it with you?
I'm not sure - but you are the one who asked me what the equivalent of 'ummah' is, in my faith. You are the one who enquired about my faith - amusingly, without even knowing what my faith is.
You may be interested in my faith, have met you there discussing it, but not me unless you invite me to.
Oh yes, I have discussed your faith. I have also discussed Hinduism, which you assume to be my faith. I have argued and debated long and hard with hindutva oriented members. Yes, I am interested in all these faiths - because people's faiths have a real impact on the world, on society. But I am not interested in the faith of a rapist or rape victim, unless the faith was the reason for the rape.
So for me Indian is Hindu
Well then, once again in the interest of truth, I have to point out that you are mistaken. Indian is not hindu. We have the largest populations of Sikhs and Jains in the world, one of the largest populations of muslims in the world, one of the largest population of Sunni and Shia muslims in the world. We also have a large number of Buddhists and Christians - the state where the incident of lynching a rape accused happened (which you mentioned for point scoring) is 90% Christian. I wonder how the muslims in India would feel, to hear you saying that they are hindus. "Indian is hinidu", as you said. They are used to hindu fundamentalist organizations like VHP saying that, so it's not new. But it's still wrong.
or now you would like to contradict your countrymen like
@doppelganger who think half of my countrymen are Hindu too.
Not sure what he means by that. If I come across a post like that, I will be sure to counter it.
So what is the parallel then?
Parallel to what? Islamic belief in an ummah? There is no parallel in Hinduism, or any other Indian religion. That's the whole point. That is why Indians make fun of Pakistanis for trying to speak on behalf of Indian muslims, although it is none of their concern. They do so because of the notion of ummah-hood. If Indians try to speak on behalf of Pakistani hindus for the same reason, you can call them out on it. I did no such thing.
Yeah because in India mobs lynch and kill the alleged offender before that once it has been found that offender belongs to minority community. And then make that alleged offender a BD migrant until it is found out that offender belonged to a military family. Just a norm in India.
PS: What is religons?
Yes, that's the norm in India. Because it has happened a grand total of ONE time. So it's the "norm". Brilliant.
Definition of norm: A standard, model or pattern regarded as typical.
PS: Congratulations for spotting a trivial and inadvertent spelling mistake. This has to be one of your best accomplishments on PDF to date. Take a bow.
