Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ISI Chief does not mean he was Army Chief.
He was appointed by Nawaz as Army Chief but never took over his office because Army revolted against his appointment.
The problem is you don't have any information and you are relying on Wikipedia for Information.
Whereas we Pakistanis were on the ground and know exactly what happened on the ground.
indians are caught red handed again pushing US propaganda. Looks like US propaganda kuli job being outsourced for indians.
This statement is from former Chief of Pakistan Army General Ziauddin Butt.
No one can deny it.
You can't call it RAW/CIA/MOSAAD conspiracy too.
Whats besides the point is that wiki says exactly what you are saying..
However, he was the ISI chief at that time and a 4 star general in Pakistan army.. Guess thats something you wont dispute.. Now if words of ISI chief of Pakistan and 4 star generals in Pakistan are not credible, then yes, you have a point
He was Booted out of the Army and has an axe to grind against Army and ISI and is part of Nawaz Sharif group who was ousted by Pak Army. They are making up stories to get even with the Army and ISI.
Is that so hard to understand ?
He was Booted out of the Army and has an axe to grind against Army and ISI and is part of Nawaz Sharif group who was ousted by Pak Army. They are making up stories to get even with the Army and ISI.
Is that so hard to understand ?
He was Booted out of the Army and has an axe to grind against Army and ISI and is part of Nawaz Sharif group who was ousted by Pak Army. They are making up stories to get even with the Army and ISI.
Is that so hard to understand ?
No disagreement here...Its just that the ex ISI chief's words about ISI will end up carrying some credibilityAnd how does he know this exactly? I thought the self-made logicians (i.e. the bharatis) didn't take insider information as proof, because according to them, anyone can claim to have this information. Remember that this guy isn't working for Pakistan military anymore, so his word by itself doesn't count.
Publication: Terrorism Monitor Volume: 9 Issue: 47December 22, 2011 04:19 PM Age: 2 daysThe other thing is... this was said, according to the article, in October. And only the bharatis are taking attention of this.
Yet again a fail for bharatis.
In their small world, the whole world knows this, but in fact no one besides them has even read this.
How old are you man?? When ISI chief talks about activities of ISI, it is considered to be an admission
When he talks about activities of RAW and CIA, they are just accusations...
Its like if you stand up and say that you are a junkie, then people will believe you because you are talking bad about yourself
If you similarly say that your neighbour is a junkie, thats just an accusation and wont be taken on face value
PS: Bold and large sized text can not introduce weight in an otherwise stupid argument .
No disagreement here...Its just that the ex ISI chief's words about ISI will end up carrying some credibility
Publication: Terrorism Monitor Volume: 9 Issue: 47December 22, 2011 04:19 PM Age: 2 days
The Jamestown Foundation: Former Pakistan Army Chief Reveals Intelligence Bureau Harbored Bin Laden in Abbottabad
auddin Butt, a former chief of the Pakistan army, told a conference on Pakistani-US ties in October that according to his knowledge, then director general of Intelligence Bureau, Brigadier (retd.) Ijaz Shah, had "kept Osama bin Laden in an Intelligence Bureau safe house in Abbottabad".
Rubbish non nonsensical rant as always
Did you again not see the problem with your argument before blabbering nonsense?
This guy is not talking about activities that happened during his tenure. He's talking about something that happened during someone else's tenure. Thus one can't go just by his word. One has to ask questions.. how did he get to know this, who told him this? This is no different than just another accusation.
And you think once he moved out of ISI, all his connections and links in the organization just poofed away..
But thats besides the point.. Am not saying that his words are cast in stone like the 10 commandments.. Just that the ex ISI chief of Pakistan has blamed ex president and present COAS of Pakistan as accessories to terrorist activities..
How old are you man?? When ISI chief talks about activities of ISI, it is considered to be an admission
When he talks about activities of RAW and CIA, they are just accusations...
Its like if you stand up and say that you are a junkie, then people will believe you because you are talking bad about yourself
If you similarly say that your neighbour is a junkie, thats just an accusation and wont be taken on face value
PS: Bold and large sized text can not introduce weight in an otherwise stupid argument .
So basically the ISI both 'hid OBL' and helped track him down and helped in the US raid. ...
Rather contradictory statements, don't you think?