VCheng
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2010
- Messages
- 48,460
- Reaction score
- 57
- Country
- Location
Their GI’s will be safe ?
The best way to keep GIs safe would be withdraw them from the country. And much cheaper that way.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Their GI’s will be safe ?
The best way to keep GIs safe would be withdraw them from the country. And much cheaper that way.
Could they do same what soviets did in the past ? I mean running back home with their tail between the legs
Of course. After all, the graveyard of empires can claim another victim easily, with Pakistan's help. Of course. If Pakistan can defeat one superpower, it can easily defeat another one. Of course!
Yep. Sure. Without doubt.
How could they swallow that the sole hyper power couldn’t defeat ragtag militia ? Of course It’s easy to find a scapegoat. Of course Pakistan is well placed to won this title.
An interesting situation for sure, one to be watched as it evolves.
At least, had they helped us to seal the border, they could have avoided, if what they claimed about cross border infiltrations from pakistani side, many deaths and severe injuries to their GI’s.
And I remember we had proposed to seal our border with Afghanistan, all western powers were crying to not do that.
A hypothetical situation what could have or should have been done, and hence impossible to discuss rationally. As I said, let us see what evolves now and in the future.
I agree with what you said about the evolving situation. But not the hypothetical situation.
We are neighbors.
I claim your dig is biting me.
You propose to seal our border.
I disagree, I don’t want any sealing.
But I continue to claim your dog is biting me.
Is it Hypothetical or Logical to have fenced ?
So now if I agree to seal the border, then you will say me ok but you pay it
That’s why I said why USA should pay the fencing
And I explained why USA will seek to just withdraw its forces without any more expense.
I agree. But how many death and legs and arms lost for their injured guys ?
But there is a say « better than later ».
US losses, terrible as they are, are quite manageable given its resources.
No doubt about it.
Wars are the drivers of the technologies development at some, if not all, point.
Considering that many here consider Pakistan to be in a state of war under attack per the topic of this thread, it would be interesting to see what technologies it can come up with to conduct its strategies, if your statement is to be accepted for discussion.
are you fuckin insane? a proscribed terrorist militant outfit picks military personnel and shoots them dead and youre saying its not terrorism? wtf? you call kashmiri freedom fighters terrorists when they have said if you give them their rights they'll lay down their arms but you're not calling real terrorists, terrorists?Failure of State Police
Internal Matter ?
These type of causalities are normal.
Still not terrorism, just another rebel group trying their best.
Hoax
These type of propaganda are normal in such a huge country.
Police man die, nothing to do with terrorism.
Nothing to worry about, just stop with your bullshit theory.