What's new

Foreign funding case: Hospital donors unaware their donations siphoned off to PTI

Some of those who claimed they contributed to the Shaukat Khanum Hospital were astonished to learn that their money had been diverted

View attachment 811417
A new twist has appeared in the lingering controversy of funding to PTI, with the veracity of contributors’ list presented to the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) by Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf becoming suspect as several contributors, named in the list, raised questions about the use of a charity for political purposes.

The PTI presented a list of individual donors to the ECP scrutiny committee who contributed $0.46 million to the party funds. However, at least 35 percent of those who contributed told The News that they did not donate to the PTI and their donations were meant for the Shaukat Khanum Hospital. Only 27 percent said that their donations were for PTI’s party funds.

The ECP, on a petition moved by Akbar S Babar, a former member of PTI, is hearing the party’s foreign funding case. Besides providing details of the party’s bank accounts and foreign companies, the PTI had also submitted a list of 1,414 names to the ECP’s scrutiny committee who donated $467,320 to the party in 2013.

Related Stories​

The News traced the donors whose names were mentioned in the party funding list. For this report, sample data of 80 donors was selected from the list. The News contacted 40 individuals who donated $1,000 or above and 40 individuals who contributed $500 or above.

Of these 80 donors, 29 responded to queries by The News. Only eight individuals (27.5 percent) claimed that they donated to the PTI for political purposes because they believed in Imran Khan; 10 of those 29 respondents (34.5%) said they donated for Shaukat Khanum Hospital because they supported this noble cause; seven individuals (24 percent) said they don’t remember and the remaining four (13.7 percent) refused to answer until this scribe proved his identity with a CNIC card and the purpose of this research.

Some of those who claimed they contributed to the Shaukat Khanum Hospital were astonished to learn that their charity money had been diverted for political purposes. In 2017, the PTI launched a membership campaign in the United States and sent membership cards to party workers residing in the US. It was a paid membership campaign and the party’s US chapter sent congratulatory messages along with payment receipts to the party members.

Read more: Auditors who issued clean chits also come under question

One such member was Rana Wasif, a resident of Lahore city who had never been out of Pakistan. Rana Wasif was sent an email along with a receipt of 120 dollars and a membership card. According to that email, Rana had paid 120 dollars to the party funds in the US, after which he was given membership to the party. Rana worked in the private sector and was a regular donor of Shaukat Khanum Hospital.

According to Rana, someone took his contact details and other information from the Shaukat Khanum Hospital data and used it for PTI’s political purposes. He contested this with the PTI office bearers in the US and Pakistan as well. Later, when this scribe contacted the-then finance secretary of PTI, Sardar Azhar Tariq, he confirmed that Rana Wasif’s complaint was genuine. M Azam Khan and his wife Naghma Khan, (serial number 36 of the list) donated $1,000 to the party fund as per the scrutiny committee, but Naghma Khan claims the couple never contributed for political purposes. “I donated funds for Shaukat Memorial Hospital, not for political funding. If the money is being diverted, I would like to know,” said Naghma in an email exchange with this scribe. Junaid Siddiqui and Hamid H Siddiqui’s (serial number 628) are on the list.

The report says they donated $3,000 for the party funds but the donors claim otherwise. “My father is a Pakistani resident, most likely if the money was given by me or my father, it was to Shaukat Khanum. We are not PTI supporters nor have any party affiliation,” said Junaid Siddiqui in a WhatsApp conversation with this scribe. Khurram Rasheed (serial number 131 on the list), according to the scrutiny committee’s report, donated $500 to the PTI. However, in his written reply to The News, he claimed, “I donated to Shaukat Khanum Hospital, not to the PTI. I am not a member of the party.” Navaid Abidi (serial number 491) contributed $500 to the party funds. However, Abidi claims he donated to the Shaukat Khanum Hospital. “I believe the donation was for the Shaukat Khanum fundraiser that took place in the Chicago suburbs. So you should see many people from the Chicago donating on the same day. While I generally support the party, I don’t remember ever actually writing a cheque to PTI,” commented Navaid Abidi. Kamran Niazi’s name is also mentioned in the PTI donors list (serial number 1046) who according to the list paid $500, but he says he does not remember giving funds for the party. “I think I contributed to the hospital but don’t remember how much and when. Don’t remember contributing to the party,” he says. There are, however, several individuals who claim they donated for the political campaign of the PTI.

One such person is Afraz Haider (serial number 191 on the list) who donated $1,000 for the party funds. “I did indeed contribute to the PTI here in the US. I do contribute to Shaukat Khanum Hospital but that is separate,” he said. Zahid Hussain Ayub (serial number 919), who donated $500 to the PTI, said in his written reply to this scribe, “I was part of the initial group for the Dallas chapter of PTI…in 2004 or 2005. During the first meeting, I proposed to register a nonprofit here in the US so the money trail is transparent. Eventually, Dr Nasrullah pursued it and PTI USA LLC was registered as a nonprofit under 503. As far as I recall, I always contributed to PTI USA LLC. Fundraising drives in which I was involved were strictly for PTI. I sponsored air tickets for Asad Qaiser, at that time speaker of KP House and MPA Haider Ali of Swat. I also sponsored a ticket for Murad Saeed but then had to cancel because of his degree issue. I have also donated to Namal College.” Mrs. Shazia Nasir (serial number 577) who donated $1,000 for the party funds said, “We donated to the PTI knowing well that 1,000 dollars were for the PTI.”

Federal Minister for Information and Broadcasting Fawad Chaudhry, while talking to The News, said, “It is impossible that Shaukat Khanum donations were diverted for political purposes. When an LDC is signed by the donor, the purpose for donation is mentioned on the cheque. Those who have donated $1,000 or above must have paid the donations through cheques. It can be verified from these cheques,” he said. The information minister added that if this scribe provides the names of those donors, then they can verify from the record whether they contributed to the hospital or to party funds.

The News also contacted PTI’s former chief organiser Saifullah Khan Niyazee but he said he cannot respond to these queries. “You should ask these questions to our party’s Finance Secretary Siraj Ahmed,” he said. When contacted, Siraj Ahmed said he cannot talk to this scribe because he was busy in a meeting. He asked me to call him later. However, despite repeated attempts, he did not attend the calls.

Editor's Note: Shaukhat Khanum is one of the country's finest NGOs, doing ground breaking work that has benefitted hundreds of thousands and should continue to be supported. This fact-based story in no way attempts to take credit away from that institution.


The sad state of journalism/media in Pakistan, it is an institute of black-mailers mafia, not journalism/media.

‘Hospital funds diversion to third party report absolutely baseless’​


News Desk
Friday, Jan 28, 2022
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
LAHORE: The Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centres (SKMCH&RC) in Lahore and Peshawar were established with the mission to provide state-of-the-art and comprehensive cancer treatment services for all patients, irrespective of their ability to pay. Recently, it was alleged in a news item in The News that donations to SKMCH&RC had been diverted to other causes. The management of SKMCH&RC strongly and categorically refutes this statement. It said: "All donations received are recorded and all donors are issued a formal receipt that can be traced back to each individual donation. We receive donations from within Pakistan and from overseas, and we are formally registered as a charity in many countries and jurisdictions. The records of all donations to Shaukat Khanum Memorial Hospital are maintained and all our financial records in Pakistan and overseas are duly audited by independent third parties to ensure compliance with all applicable local regulations. Therefore, to say that these funds have been diverted to any third party is absolutely baseless, and untrue. All funds donated to SKMCH&RC are, without exception, used for the purpose they were intended, which is, ultimately, to provide world class care to cancer patients, irrespective of their ability to pay."

The SKMCH&RC in its clarification said over the last thirty years or more, the trust and confidence of many millions of donors has meant that we see more than 40,000 cancer patients each year at our hospitals in Lahore and Peshawar - most of whom would have been unable to access highly specialised cancer treatment elsewhere. "We treat over 75 percent of our cancer patients completely free of charge, through the generosity of our donors. All contributions are used solely in fulfilling our mission of providing cancer treatment, and any attempt to besmirch this institution, or to sow doubt in the minds of donors is tantamount to playing with patient’s lives. Finally, it is surprising that the publications in question have chosen to ignore journalistic norms, and made no attempt to verify this information with SKMCH&RC, before publishing this article."
Meanwhile a PTI source who is also close to the top management of Shaukat Khanum Hospital said the hospital is accredited and certified by the Joint Commission International (JCI). Shaukat Khanum hospital is among the four top hospitals in the country which is certified by JCI.
Apart from JCI certification, the Shaukat Khanum Hospital is annually audited by the top auditors who never pointed out any such anomalies. The hospital receives donations to the tune of Rs9 billion annually. This reflects the public’s trust in the hospital that is serving humanity 24/7.
"Normally people are shy and try to avoid the media. Many people do not want to be highlighted as a supporter of any specific political party publicly. In order to avoid any political repercussions, these donors might have denied supporting the political campaign publicly and told the reporter that their donations were for the hospital,” commented the PTI leader.
He further said that they will thoroughly investigate the matter of how the list of those donors landed in the ECP’s scrutiny committee report and how the secrecy of the party donors was breached.


 
.
You are part of the nation of hypocrite expats



Best person: Liar, breaker of promises, father of illegitimate children, owner of illegal land and bank accounts, claimed to be a homosexual by his wife, sons living with Jewish royalty, and so on and so forth.

You go be a hypocrite now OK? Enjoy the pounds and abuse the currency exchange wink wink. No wonder every expats love IK, he is making currency exchange rates awesome
Yeah hes a jewish agent and what not.
Please tell us how much does 1 acre of jati umra cost?
Meri london mein tou kya qatar mein bhi jaidadien nai?
UK apartments?
Capt safdar ki double shiftien?
Attack on supreme court?
Ayesha ahad?
Kulsoom haye case?
Gullu butt massacre?
Hudaibya ?
TT case?
Sex tape scandals?
Justice qayum?

O patwario ghairat ko dafna k zinda kaisay phir rahay ho?
 
.
You are part of the nation of hypocrite expats



Best person: Liar, breaker of promises, father of illegitimate children, owner of illegal land and bank accounts, claimed to be a homosexual by his wife, sons living with Jewish royalty, and so on and so forth.

You go be a hypocrite now OK? Enjoy the pounds and abuse the currency exchange wink wink. No wonder every expats love IK, he is making currency exchange rates awesome

Your response to the above shows your upbringing as a low IQ, yeh Godfather left the country with rivers of milk and honey and then IK destroyed the country within 3 and half years according to your stunted wierd logic.

Without expats money Pakistan won't survive, so why did your Godfather run away to London.
You are part of the nation of hypocrite expats



Best person: Liar, breaker of promises, father of illegitimate children, owner of illegal land and bank accounts, claimed to be a homosexual by his wife, sons living with Jewish royalty, and so on and so forth.

You go be a hypocrite now OK? Enjoy the pounds and abuse the currency exchange wink wink. No wonder every expats love IK, he is making currency exchange rates awesome
 
.
if this is true than this is beyond horrible, i in no way support PTI but have donated to Shaukat Khanum ... this is wrong on so many fronts
 
. .
Stop donating if you believe Jang, Geo, The News Patwari media group is more truthful than Shaukat Khanum Trust

bhai ... like i said IF, even if probability of this happening is 0.1% it should be thoroughly investigated, why is it so hard for you to comprehend that PTI or IK is beyond any ghalti/sin/wrong doing?

the only person on the face of this earth who was beyond mistakes was our Prophet PBUH apart from him ANYONE and EVERYONE is subject to making mistakes so why take aggressive stance in defending PTI and IK so much? the same goes for NS/Altaf/PPP/JI/Army/Media or anyone else sheesh we should look at everything objectively beyond any bias.

honestly take a chill pill, sit back and look at things objectively, you are more than welcome to react with your sarcastic laugh like you usually do
 
.
Just a couple of things here:

1- Out of 1400 people, only 40 were studied. Would like to know what is the confidence level of this 'study' and other sample statistics. Because the headline has been framed as if the sample is representative of the population. But is it?

2- How the heck does a reporter get contact details of each donor? Is donor name and contact detail also public data? I am sure they did not consent to that while giving a donation.

3- There's a lot of could have, maybe, I don't know etc in the statements. Secondly, the way a question is framed also needs to be taken into consideration.

But if PTI did indeed do this, then they should be banned and honestly should be facing jail time.

But if they didn't, then Jang should be slapped with a huge law suit by Shaukat Khanum. This isn't the first time they have done something like this.
 
.
Just a couple of things here:

1- Out of 1400 people, only 40 were studied. Would like to know what is the confidence level of this 'study' and other sample statistics. Because the headline has been framed as if the sample is representative of the population. But is it?

2- How the heck does a reporter get contact details of each donor? Is donor name and contact detail also public data? I am sure they did not consent to that while giving a donation.

3- There's a lot of could have, maybe, I don't know etc in the statements. Secondly, the way a question is framed also needs to be taken into consideration.

But if PTI did indeed do this, then they should be banned and honestly should be facing jail time.

But if they didn't, then Jang should be slapped with a huge law suit by Shaukat Khanum. This isn't the first time they have done something like this.

I agree 100%. Pakistani media laws are just useless, anyone can publish anything without proof, causing nationwide mental anguish and on top harming the reputation of institutions that are servicing the poor. And what are they doing this for? just so they can get some political leverage.

The initiators and the people that are supporting them in these acts are worse than traitors.
 
.
But if PTI did indeed do this, then they should be banned and honestly should be facing jail time.

But if they didn't, then Jang should be slapped with a huge law suit by Shaukat Khanum. This isn't the first time they have done something like this.

I agree, Shaukat Khanum is a name which was/is household name of trust and even if ONE percentage of the report is correct it should be thoroughly investigated, on the other hand if it's wrong than Jang should be taken to hell and back for destroying image of such a institution
 
.
But if they didn't, then Jang should be slapped with a huge law suit by Shaukat Khanum. This isn't the first time they have done something like this.
Jang, Geo, The News Patwari media group doesn't hesitate from attacking Supreme Court, High Courts if needed to save their Abu Nawaz Sharif from corruption cases
 
.
Noon League, its followers and its favorite media house have tried this before. This will not stick. But its the low level mentality of Noon League and its hospitals that keeps dragging a charity hospital in their propaganda.
 
.
Jang, Geo, The News Patwari media group doesn't hesitate from attacking Supreme Court, High Courts if needed to save their Abu Nawaz Sharif from corruption cases

It is ironic, since back in the 90s when Mian saanp was in power for the second time (I think), they had gone to war with Jang group along with storming the Supreme Court. They had stopped Jang from importing ink and printing paper. Jang was reduced to printing on reddish color paper and the whole newspaper was 4 pages as their rolls were held up at the port.
Politics & money does make strange bedfellows.
 
.
It is ironic, since back in the 90s when Mian saanp was in power for the second time (I think), they had gone to war with Jang group along with storming the Supreme Court. They had stopped Jang from importing ink and printing paper. Jang was reduced to printing on reddish color paper and the whole newspaper was 4 pages as their rolls were held up at the port.
Politics & money does make strange bedfellows.
And today same Sharif mafia is leading so called democracy revolution in Pakistan. This mafia is worse than military dictators when in power.
@muhammadhafeezmalik @Tameem
 
.
And today same Sharif mafia is leading so called democracy revolution in Pakistan. This mafia is worse than military dictators when in power.
@muhammadhafeezmalik @Tameem

Same Jang group was once favorite newsgroup of Imran Khan.

1643611050538.png
 
.
Love how patwari's in this thread were having orgasms over something that was published by their own media cell aka Jang / The News without any proof. :lol:
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom