temporary12345
FULL MEMBER
New Recruit
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2016
- Messages
- 63
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
It does not work like this.
Suppose you are able to buy politicians;you are also able to get a president to say that Islamic terrorism is fault of America. Then what? People in position of power in USA have been saying so for quite a long time.
Would you be able to convince US population that Islam is religion of peace? I don't think so. Instead by such proclamation, that president would lose popularity faster than a ghetto whøre loses her chlamydia -ve status.
You see, no one in power in USA ever accused Islam being cause of terrorism. Whether it was Bush ,or was it Obama, or Hillary, or mainstream US media, it was always how great Islam is, how peace loving it is, and how Jihadis have strayed from precepts from Islam and how they are in minority. This has been the constant story being played in media over and over again. On top of it, organization like CAIR has been at the forefront of pushing Islamofascist agenda in USA demanding concessions not granted to another groups (recent one that come to my mind is Muslims demanding daily closure of a meat packaging plant ,twice a day, so that do they could all pray at same time, even though owner was ready to give them breaks in batches). You see, everything that Saudi/Muslim/Petrodollar money could have brought- Politicians, Media, Lawyers - have already been brought. There is nothing to buy.
The hatred against Muslims ,that I see rising in whole of the world, is organic. People are stupid, but not that stupid as you think they are. In this age of internet (which means less dependency on mainstream media) people see repeated action of Jihad all around the world. They see Muslims butchering people in USA on regular basis. They see Muslims doing same thing to their brothers in Europe (whites do not care about terrorism in rest of the world). Thus irrespective of amount of propaganda being put out, they tend to see Islam as a violent cult.The degree of influence that person has on population is in direct proportion to his legitimacy and moral authority. President does not have a moral authority among his electorate to change their organically formed opinions. If he/she is foolish enough to try it, it would be he/she who would suffer loss of legitimacy, rather that Islam gaining legitimacy.
And trying to institutionalize Islamophobia like anti-Semetism would run into many problems. First, History is against viewing Muslims as victims. Jews really have been victims for most of history, while Muslims have been mass-murdering rapist maniacs (this is the reason why Islam is second largest religion in the world) for most of history. Any attempt to paint Muslims as victims is going to run into a wall of evidence to suggest the opposite ,and it is too late and there is enough material in public domain that mass buying of scholars is not going to change that. Second, Jihadis around the world who regularly slaughter people in west are biggest advertisement against Islamophobia, And Third and most important point: Adversary of Jews are not whites; they are Arabs.The bogey of anti-semetism does not harm white interests, thus they do not care. Primary enemy of Muslims are Whites atm. What you are asking them is to undermine their own interests and provide special victim status to Muslims!!! I think you are mistaken here. Had primary adversary of Jews been whites; rather than being provided victim status, there would have been a second holocaust.
Last edited:
