abdulbarijan
PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
- Joined
- May 15, 2010
- Messages
- 1,251
- Reaction score
- 31
Well, to be honest majority of the reports about the tejas have been 'futuristic' since the 1980's.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
After long time....Well, to be honest majority of the reports about the tejas have been 'futuristic' since the 1980's.
The only tense suitable for this plane is "past tense".I must admit, I'm still not sure what to think of this !? ... bat anyway I think it is worth a separate thread since it is no longer the original Tejas:
https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/if-...of-tejas-could-match-iafs-rafale-jets-2159016
I must admit, I'm still not sure what to think of this !? ... bat anyway I think it is worth a separate thread since it is no longer the original Tejas:
https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/if-...of-tejas-could-match-iafs-rafale-jets-2159016
I must admit, I'm still not sure what to think of this !? ... bat anyway I think it is worth a separate thread since it is no longer the original Tejas:
https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/if-...of-tejas-could-match-iafs-rafale-jets-2159016
India of 80's is a poor nation, isolated itself of the world. It went about Tejas on it's own. Hence the delay. New India is open, vibrant, industrious, you'll see that similar projects gets done in time, at price.No Sir, in next century. They shows too many hard points, even Rafale didn't have too many like this.
It's because Tejas Mk1 has been ready for a long time, with a few more additional things added in time. The idea that it's not ready is simply because it wasn't mass produced. Mk1 became less of a necessity with the upgrades on almost all IAF fighters, especially the Bison. The idea was to invest in more capable Tejas variants, starting with MK1A (eqvnt to PAF Blk3).Tejas is not fully ready and then another similar 4th plane, I can't get Indian's logic behind this move.
Doesn't make sense at all.
It makes sense if it's based on Tejas.It's because Tejas Mk1 has been ready for a long time, with a few more additional things added in time. The idea that it's not ready is simply because it wasn't mass produced. Mk1 became less of a necessity with the upgrades on almost all IAF fighters, especially the Bison. The idea was to invest in more capable Tejas variants, starting with MK1A (eqvnt to PAF Blk3).
When it's about design and development, success shouldn't be measured by production numbers. It's about the capabilities we gain along the way. The picture will completely change in a decade, and then it'll make sense.
Every fighter (and one LIFT) India has in development, naval or air force, except AMCA, is based on the Tejas/LCA.It makes sense if it's based on Tejas.
I heard it's from scratch from some Indian website as I remembered.
Looks very Rafale like.
If India can get the Kaveri engine working , then I can see them getting to current Rafale level within 10 years.
Thanks for this thread as I think it is interesting to discuss.