acetophenol
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2011
- Messages
- 7,006
- Reaction score
- 6
- Country
- Location
If My Pak friends want to discuss Jf-17 Block 2,please do it,ignore other posts.
.
.
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I was discussing jftThread is about JFT....Please stick to the topic.
As long as you bring in/quote India,MKI,LCA etc, I'll be forced to reply you,further derailing this thread.
You can call me whatever you want,but I never started any off-topic discussions. However ,I will respond to any poster who brings in India related matters.Why would you be forced to reply upon that off topic don't you have you head to think independently and report instead which is precisely provided for a reason or are you saying you are a troll who will troll. @Emmie notice the post.
You can call me whatever you want,but I never started any off-topic discussions. However ,I will respond to any poster who brings in India related matters.
Ok I will give you negative if you start maha india into a thread where hindustan related topics are banned. Do not reply further.
which bvr bro. ? sd10 or sd10a or sd10-b ?I know when exactly SD-10 was tested on JF-17 and where. Rest assured you can believe all you want, Thunder is BVR locked and loaded.
Do you have something to prove that we lost an ERIEYE ?
I just asked you because it's your stance ...backing it with a proof is not something like I have asked for a galaxy from u...Ooh bhai maaf ker dey !!!
Please Search this forum for ERIEYE and you will found enough threads running. Go to them read them and make up a point. This is my point and I wont go by an inch until proved me wrong. AND YES I will be highly delighted to be proved wrong.
I just asked you because it's your stance ...backing it with a proof is not something like I have asked for a galaxy from u...
Okie .... Just a
fast Google search ..... I will try finding some If I can wish me luck bro
ahh, so, you have fulfilled you quest and come up with the FACT that since the AMRAAM are in such short number there are no pics available and thus proven that with no pic of SD-10 with JFT, the SD-10 is also a rumor!What I found in my search loads of PAF F-16 flying with Sidewinder one F-16 with training round that you already prove its a training round in 2012 discussion .... So, no offence in saying PAF just don't like Photographing the jets with Missile or the missile are in such a shortage that not a single pik of F-16 is available even after such a long time of Induction of AMRAAM .... Seriously a big y on no pik ?
Ambala to station first squadron of MMRCA fighters | Page 25
Since your claim is more taller than anything, whenever you get time, post something as a proof ...right now you can use your grey and white for your job work which need so much attention from you !
SD-10 was intergrated with Blk 1 and there are rumors that the latter prototype for Blk II carried SD-10Awhich bvr bro. ? sd10 or sd10a or sd10-b ?