LOL.. to destroy an MIRV missile ud have to first detect it... than detect its multiple re vehicles apart from the debris & decoys in space... and than target all those warheads..
And that too in a short time.
Even US finds it hard let alone a country like India .
You are right that after reentry it is difficult to neutralise mirv but we are when able to intercept Pakistany missile in sluggish ascending phase why we go after reentry . We have ability to intercept just after launch and target before terminal phase and time taken by missile to terminal phase is well in minutes .
A nuclear expert from Moscow says despite heavy investments in developing anti-ballistic missile systems, India may not be able to fully defend itself in a conflict from strikes by Pakistani missiles.
“Even in 10 years and with the huge budgets that India plans to spend on the development of nuclear weapons and capabilities, it is difficult to imagine it will be able to defend its territory from possible strikes from Pakistan in case of conflict,” said Petr Topychkanov, a senior researcher at the Carnegie Moscow Centre’s Non-Proliferation Programme.
Talking about ‘Non-Proliferation and Strategic Stability in South Asia: A Russian Perspective’ at the Strategic Vision Institute (SIV) which is an Islamabad-based think tank specialising in nuclear issues, Mr Topychkanov said that despite largescale cooperation between India and Israel for the development of a ballistic missile defence system and Indian efforts for acquiring S-400 defence systems from Russia, “India is very far from developing any system that could effectively defend itself from a Pakistani missile”.
I donot know about this person but one thing is sure he is helping us to glorify pakistany threat , we love such type of person but one he should improve his knowledge, being a Russian he does not know that s400 is not primarily BMD .
