Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Famous Islamic preacher jailed leader of leading Islamic party Bangladesh jamat is no more. Innaliahi wa Innaliahi rajeun
His soul will finally be together with Kaguya in moon. Dude literally died on Pakistan's Independence Day. He's truly a "Saccha Pakistani".
"আমি খাড়ায়া যামু, আপনে বসায়া দিবেন! লোকে বোঝবে আমাদের মধ্যে কোন সম্পর্ক নাই!"How are you so sure of his so called "war crimes"? Do you have any conclusive evidence? Because the ICT proceeding does not suggest anything conclusive. It's all circumstantial hearsay and weak documents.
If you read the ICT judgement against him, you will find the judges parroting the exact same official BAL position when it comes to 1971. The judges must be impartial for a fair trial. But their write up clearly gives away their bias.
I don't know if he was actually ever involved in war crimes such as murder and rape. So I will not try to defend him but nor will I accuse him.
However, I do know one thing - this trial was anything but fair. It was simply a campaign to persecute political opponents. There is no justice in the Bangladeshi justice system.
And that I can never side with.
Today it is political opponents and tomorrow it will be average citizens. Next thing you know, you live in a country akin to that of North Korea.
Did you read the judgement? It seems to have pages and pages of eyewitness testimony. It is amazing they were able get that much evidence in a war crimes case. Ordinary criminal courts convict with much lesser evidence.How are you so sure of his so called "war crimes"? Do you have any conclusive evidence? Because the ICT proceeding does not suggest anything conclusive. It's all circumstantial hearsay and weak documents.
If you read the ICT judgement against him, you will find the judges parroting the exact same official BAL position when it comes to 1971. The judges must be impartial for a fair trial. But their write up clearly gives away their bias.
I don't know if he was actually ever involved in war crimes such as murder and rape. So I will not try to defend him but nor will I accuse him.
However, I do know one thing - this trial was anything but fair. It was simply a campaign to persecute political opponents. There is no justice in the Bangladeshi justice system.
And that I can never side with.
Today it is political opponents and tomorrow it will be average citizens. Next thing you know, you live in a country akin to that of North Korea.
Did you read the judgement? It seems to have pages and pages of eyewitness testimony. It is amazing they were able get that much evidence in a war crimes case. Ordinary criminal courts convict with much lesser evidence.
I have no ability to gauge judge's bias. But the judgment has an equal amount of Guilty and Not Guilty decisions sprinkled around. It is hard to call that as a kangaroo court. They could have simply declared everyone guilty without all that hairsplitting.Yes, I have read it. But I don't think you are able to comprehend what I conveyed in my post.
Re-read the judgement and observe the judge's perspective. If you can't identify a bias, then you are just as biased as the rest.
As for the eye witness testimony - it's Bangladesh. You can produce whatever testimony you want.
I am not here to defend Saidee, I am here to dispute the fairness and the intention of the trial itself.