What's new

Faizabad agreement 'can't be legally justified' is unconstitutional: IHC

Yes, and he has also served as advocate of the Lal Mosque Imam.. plus he is a close relative of Irfan Siddiqui.

lovely !!

By the way what happened to the Blasphemy case? Some media outlets were trying to make an Idol out of him just because he can sit there and deliver speeches which are non existent in the verdict and subsequent implementation.

I do not care about his connection with anyone. Most of those who have enjoyed power or are in power are related to each other. This is nothing new nor something left unnoticed by the masses. It is just another tool to keep power in the family. Its most prevalent in Muzzie countries, i guess they took Mongol invasion incestly seriously.
 
.
This leads to the sectarianism too.

This same judge freed Maulana Ghazi of Lal mosque from all the cases of terrorism against the state.

Since Khadim Rizwi belongs to the Barailvi group, therefore therefore Deobandi group is in fire watching their opponents getting the political powers.
 
.
he IHC, however, had noted a "number of serious objections on the terms of agreement" and expressed its displeasure over the army’s role in the settlement made with the protesters.
"Who is the army to adopt a mediator's role?" Justice Siddiqui had inquired in the previous hearing. "Where does the law assign this role to a major general?"
It is a rather obvious that the military is attempting to take down the judiciary's limited de facto power to check military rule.
 
.
What crime, which terrorism? Once you pass through the dry cleaning process in Rawalpindi, you come out clean like Mustafa Kamal, Dr Asim, Asif Zardari, and clowns in PTI.

Khadim Hussain Rizvi brigade was peaceful, they didn't kill any policemen, didn't blind any, didn't paralyse the Capital city of Pakistan. Once they chanted, Pak Army Zindabad, they turned to angels.
 
.
Justice Siddiqui was also bewildered at how the state could abolish terrorist cases against the same protesters who had paralysed the capital and brutally tortured police officials.
“Is the police not a part of the state? You should pay a four-month salary to the police officials for their work” he said.
The weakness of Pakistan's court system is that it has no sheriffs or marshals - no law enforcement organs of its own even for civil judgments. The court system is thus reduced to a mere advisory service whose pronouncements are followed or ignored at the convenience of those who wield the enforcers.
 
.
The weakness of Pakistan's court system is that it has no sheriffs or marshals - no law enforcement organs of its own even for civil judgments. The court system is thus reduced to a mere advisory service whose pronouncements are followed or ignored at the convenience of those who wield the enforcers.

There's another problem. Courts have been influenced by the military junta. Ayub Khan and his bandwagon used Justice Munir etc. Zia played with courts, Musharraf humped it. General sahib has always used it to serve their purpose. Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui is one of a few persons who apparently don't bow to the heavy boots.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom