What's new

F-22p News & Discussions

.
Isn't it pointless to make a stealthy hull, add stealthy VL air defence then leave the anti-ship missiles in exposed box launchers? What VL AShM options would be available to the PN and what about stealthy CIWS options? Or am I going overboard with the stealth thing and VL air defence is nothing to do with reducing radar signature?

Would VL MICA be a good option if the PAF adopt it on their new fighters? Common maintenance facilities, reduced price due to large order, etc.? In the last couple of years the PAF have been serious about buying it for their next batch of JF-17.

Type 054A normally carries 32 (4x8) SAMs. If, instead, you put, say, 16-24 VL Mica, you might be able to accommodate a VL for SSM. The only systems currently available would be russian > Universal VL launcher + Club SSM or Onix SSM (a.k.a. Brahmos). So, even with Club VL, possible but not very likely. So, next best is to modify the design somewhat to shield the SSMs currently on it. Examples: Dutch LCF/Zeven provincien and Russian project 20380 Steregushy.

F22P is stealthier than Jiangwei 2 yet hardly a stealth hull compared to Type 054A. No room for a VL SSM without loosing SAMs.
 
Last edited:
.
Now, it's time to release the 3rd F-22P.
F-22P & 054B in the same port.
 

Attachments

  • 2009071008573666674500.jpg
    2009071008573666674500.jpg
    80.1 KB · Views: 40
  • 2009071008573782447300.jpg
    2009071008573782447300.jpg
    92.9 KB · Views: 33
  • 2009071008574235519300.jpg
    2009071008574235519300.jpg
    89.4 KB · Views: 36
  • 2009071008574429189100.jpg
    2009071008574429189100.jpg
    92.9 KB · Views: 36
.
251(F-22P) , 512 (designed for Thailand ,and exported to Thailand in 2006) , and 054 class (China) are all come from the original chinese F-16U. They looks alike very much concerning the body.

512, built in the same ship factory with F-22P in ShangHai, was installed with western weapons. Though the 512 was built later than 251, i think 512 are better than 251 about ship's body,more invisible on radar.
512 was left a blank after the gun in the front to install VSL like 054 though the tailand did't installed because of money.
so why can't we have VLS and make our ship more stealth?:what:

ÑǶ«¾üÊÂÉçÇø-ÑǶ«¾üÊÂÍøÆìϾüÊÂÂÛ̳-www.warchina.com - Powered by Discuz! Board
 

Attachments

  • 15124097_200810080821588909900.jpg
    15124097_200810080821588909900.jpg
    69.8 KB · Views: 43
  • 1020487_110385690.jpg
    1020487_110385690.jpg
    96.7 KB · Views: 31
  • 1020487_935806202.jpg
    1020487_935806202.jpg
    92.6 KB · Views: 32
  • 0b63c258-cc02-4afa-a6cb-19f058d63e7e副本.jpg
    0b63c258-cc02-4afa-a6cb-19f058d63e7e副本.jpg
    97.5 KB · Views: 39
.
251(F-22P) , 512 (designed for Thailand ,and exported to Thailand in 2006) , and 054 class (China) are all come from the original chinese F-16U. They looks alike very much concerning the body.

Nope.

1. The 251/F22P is a 2500-3500 ton frigate that derives from the Type 053H3 (Jianghu 2) class frigates.
2. The vessel '512' is the second 1440 ton 'Pattani class' OPV built to Thai specs, with western armaments.
3. While Type 054/A is a more recent 4500 ton frigate design for domestic consumption, theF-16U is a 1600 ton frigate specifically designed for export (with western arms and sensors) first revealed in 1999.

512 was left a blank after the gun in the front to install VSL like 054 though the tailand did't installed because of money.
so why can't we have VLS and make our ship more stealth?:what:
Pattani class doesn't have space and weight reserved for a VLS forward of the bridge, you're confused with the F25T frigate (another Type 053H3 derivative) a.k.a. Narusuan class.
 
.
Nope.

1. The 251/F22P is a 2500-3500 ton frigate that derives from the Type 053H3 (Jianghu 2) class frigates.
2. The vessel '512' is the second 1440 ton 'Pattani class' OPV built to Thai specs, with western armaments.
3. While Type 054/A is a more recent 4500 ton frigate design for domestic consumption, theF-16U is a 1600 ton frigate specifically designed for export (with western arms and sensors) first revealed in 1999.


Pattani class doesn't have space and weight reserved for a VLS forward of the bridge, you're confused with the F25T frigate (another Type 053H3 derivative) a.k.a. Narusuan class.



Thank you ~:smitten:
You're really an expert~
I just think that 512 and 054 are beautiful than 251~
 
. . . . . . . .

Attachments

  • 15561366_200907150931476197800.jpg
    15561366_200907150931476197800.jpg
    94.8 KB · Views: 28
  • 15561366_200907150931522860000.jpg
    15561366_200907150931522860000.jpg
    94.6 KB · Views: 21
  • 15561366_2009071509314614953400.jpg
    15561366_2009071509314614953400.jpg
    94.9 KB · Views: 19
  • 15561366_2009071509314661849900.jpg
    15561366_2009071509314661849900.jpg
    92.5 KB · Views: 22
  • 15561366_2009071509314930324400.jpg
    15561366_2009071509314930324400.jpg
    90.2 KB · Views: 23
. .

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom