Spring Onion
PDF VETERAN
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2006
- Messages
- 41,403
- Reaction score
- 19
- Country
- Location
I hope those 12 F-16 will be delivered much earlier than 2010.
Yes hope so though it says by 2010 wish if they deliever it before that to say in 09.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I hope those 12 F-16 will be delivered much earlier than 2010.
Yes hope so though it says by 2010 wish if they deliever it before that to say in 09.
I mean 2010 is the date before which all 18 will be delivered and I assumed work on block C will commence first and block D will be the last one to be delivered and may require some technical discussions with PAF etc. Where as I expect LHM only waiting for green signal and can produce much more than six per year.
Again, this is purely my personal analysis and has no authentic source of information.
Usually D's come first and then C's. D's allow for additional pilots to be converted over to the type as they are two seaters and the sqn slated to be the OCU can start operating before the regular F-16 blk 52 sqn is brought on line with both Cs and Ds.
New Recruit
1) Look at the countries that operate or will soon operate them. Turkey, UAE, Morocco, Chile, Poland, Oman and Singapore...they are all countries that we could have serious relations with at varying levels. Turkey is a potential long-term military, economic and political ally...and we are already conducting joint air exercises with them, but with Block-52+ we will both be operating the same standard. Oman is a neighbour on the Arabian Sea, and a potential strategic plus if we play our cards right...we can militarily, strategically and economically be close to them. Our F-16s, P-3Cs and frigates being frequent visitors and perhaps setting up a base there - encircling the Arabian Sea.
Poland and Singapore are countries we are looking to have decent economic relations with, so why not conduct joint exercises with them as well...they are afterall NATO or pretty close to NATO. Morocco and Chile could have their advantages too, North Africa and South America - we could set a light footprint there as well...plus Chile and Singapore also operate Israeli equipment - notably Phalcon - , we might be able to train around India's Israel-inspired systems...or grab enough exposure for us to have a solid idea about a possible 'similar concept' with the Sino-Pak AWACS.
UAE operates Block-60s, but there is enough basic commonality between Block-60 and Block-52+ to allow for interoperability, joint-exercises, etc. Again we could establish a long-term relation and strengthen our print in the Arabian Gulf. Now if you look at the 'closeness' of Turkey, UAE and Pakistan...imagine that scary notion of them possibly assisting us with their aircraft when we could need it...or when we need to replace those A/Bs, why not pick up available Block-52+ and 60s if they come super cheap?...or simply conducting international missions together, such a minor Arabian Sea/Greater Middle East pact. I'm not kidding...look at the similarity of aircraft, usage of Link-16 and UAE even considering one of Erieye and Wedgetail. Though with Turkey and UAE growing into powerful economic and political players...a lot is possible.
2) By 2010 the Mirage ROSE-II/III might be very old and the PAF may be scaling their operations down a bit. So we will need a precision-strike fighter to "hold the line" until the presently air-superiority oriented JF-17 becomes multi-role. From 2009 to 2012 I think we may see PAF Block-52+ and MLU3 conducting precision air-strikes on the Western border...and if we grow more independent from the West, we may see Block-52+ 'leaking' into Afghanistan against terror camps there. Nonetheless by 2012-2013 I expect the ROSE-I/II to be replaced by strike-capable JF-17 variants that may have different airframes than the current type - i.e. CFTs, enlarged wings, etc.
3) To the PAF/Pakistan - Block-52+ conformal fuel tank and comparative enhancements from F-16A/B might be useful. We may be able to learn more about the concepts and perhaps apply them to JF-17 in extending its range and payload. To the Chinese the Block-52+ would be useless...unless it had DRFM and AESA - which is a possibility with PAF, but unlikely. With the advances of Chinese and even local Pakistani initiatives, I think by 2015 the JF-17 will be superior to Block-52+ in terms of avionics, ECM/EW, radar, weapon-systems and maybe even range and payload.
Those are the possibilities I could come up with...God knows what PAF might be thinking. So please guys act a bit more mature and stop calling the PAF stupid for making its own decisions. At the end of the day we are forum kids with free time, and for them PAF is a professional career.
Indeed, D will be the first to arrive to allow training in pakistan.
First F-16 deivered in early eighties was a F-16B for the same purpose, the batch was made of 4 F-16B and 2 F-16A's.
couldnt agree more...
if my memory serves me right there were 12 F-16Bs in the 1st order of 40 a/c and at that time raised eyebrows however PAF wanted a fleet of 100 a/c including attrition replacements.
the new order of 18 F-16C/Ds contains 6 F-16Ds. once again considered a high ratio. however it is my view that they want a full-strength OCU sqdn of 18 a/c so that they can bring PAF pilots up-to-speed on the two types of F-16s that will be in our possession by 2009-10 (F-16A/B MLU and the C/D models). i also expect the PAF to take up the option of a second batch of 18 F-16C/Ds once the delivery of the 1st order starts.
See Sundays Jang Left Side Bottom i think F-16s are again not comming
Donot get so disappointed as yet !
Till the day US is in Afghanistan ........ Their is no turning their back on Pakistan.