Export bids for JF-17 Thunder Multirole Lightweight Fighter Aircraft

[RAMPAGE]

I hope it's not us.

Agreed.

Your Godforsaken country does not need our help to perform ethnic cleansing.

Myanmar bought export version of AK .. The MBT-2000.. I don't know I they operate AZs too ?

No they don't.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

Agreed.

Your Godforsaken country does not need our help to perform ethnic cleansing.

Calm down bud.. They already are our customers .. They operate our tanks,buy military equipment and even trained by us....

 

[RAMPAGE]

Calm down bud.. They already are our customers .. They operate our tanks,buy military equipment and even trained by us....

Sure. Does not mean these butchers don't deserve a kick in the butt.

And no this aint an Ummah thingy.

 

[alaungphaya]

Why not? You don't like JF -17? Just curious.

Honestly, I haven't seen any telemetry data or anything like that but I know it's a F7 derivative and it's a first attempt at making a fighter aircraft by Pakistan so I don't think it will be competitive against any of the aircraft we would theoretically oppose. Also, it's telling that China jointly developed it and they haven't touched it. That probably is the most telling.

 

[rockstar08]

And no this aint an Ummah thingy.

i think this can be done under a " Humanitarian Aid " banner

 

[VCheng]

Pakistan looks to boost military export with revamped JF-17 - The Express Tribune


China Military Online English Edition

I, for one, would be pleasantly surprised, if such an export deal is finalized for the JF-17.

 

[alaungphaya]

I doubt you can afford to buy it..30-35 million $ is quiet a big amount for a country like myanmar... Better but more F-7s ,second hand cheap migs.. If your tiny budget allows.. I win

A country like Myanmar with a higher military budget than Sri Lanka and BD? I hope you're right.

 

[salarsikander]

I haven't seen any telemetry data or anything like that but I know it's a F7 derivative

Hi,
Look at the contradiction in the first part of statement and in the last part, re read it again and tell me how would you sound to me ?

 

[Paksanity]

Honestly, I haven't seen any telemetry data or anything like that but I know it's a F7 derivative and it's a first attempt at making a fighter aircraft by Pakistan so I don't think it will be competitive against any of the aircraft we would theoretically oppose. Also, it's telling that China jointly developed it and they haven't touched it. That probably is the most telling.

Ok, your choice. It is not F-7 derivative by the way. Not by a long shot. I believe Myanmar already operates some of our defence equipment. Did any of it failed to live up to expectations? Ever? Sri Lankans might be able to give you a clue on how our defence items work in real conflict. Just saying.

 

[alaungphaya]

Hi,
Look at the contradiction in the first part of statement and in the last part, re read it again and tell me how would you sound to me ?

Do I need telemetry data to know what it was derived from?

 

[salarsikander]

Do I need telemetry data to know what it was derived from?

Hi,

It is apparent from your post that you have no Idea of what youre talking about.

Allow me to broaden your narrow vision, Since you opened your big mouth by calling it f-7 derivative, you might want to share the telemetry data (as if such details are available) of F-7 so that we can confirm that Telemetry (fancy word) data somewhat matches to Jf-17. or derivative as you have put it with your enormous knowledge

 

[Bilal.]

Do I need telemetry data to know what it was derived from?

What part of it is derived from F-7? The wings, the tail, the lerx, the intakes, the engine, the avionics, the cockpit? Which part is from F-7?

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

What part of it is derived from F-7? The wings, the tail, the lerx, the intakes, the engine, the avionics, the cockpit? Which part is from F-7?

Little guy is butthurt over myanmar genocide comments.

 

[Spectre]

No ill intentions here but

1. I was just curious as to why countries would refrain from naming buyer's for their export. Its natural that they would advertise it to get more buyers. If other countries see that someone is buying your jets then they would think its reliable and hence their interest would rise. For Eg. Rafale, Typhoons, Sukhois etc

2. I am also not sure as to why a buyer wouldn't like to be named as i think all almost all countries regularly buy fighter jets. Its not a controlled tech like long range missiles or air defense or nuclear tech

The only scenario it makes sense if

a. Buyer has international sanctions against it.
b. Pakistan doesn't have good public relationship with buyer or vice versa
c. China or some major ally of Pak doesn't approve of the buyer or vice versa for buyer's alliers

I would be very interested in hearing your thoughts

@Hyperion @Oscar @nair @Nicky G @Horus

 

[salarsikander]

his is just how I see it.

Hi, who are you ? An air expert, critic, Flight testing engineer ?
Do you really think whatever you think from your tiny really matters ?