Era of ignoring Saudi terror sponsorship over: Germany

[Beast]

I agree with the Germans. Take out the root of all evil, stop hugging these fukkers from KSA to finance and spread terrorism directly and indirectly. And you've fixed 50% of the problem. The remainder 50%, is in the shape of ISIS, Al-Qaeda, Taliban and all. You then take them out through force, and since there won't be any financing, training and recruiting going on, these things will due and become "local" to whatever mosque these fools go to in Afghanistan, etc.

KSA needed to be warned and stopped decades ago. But instead, just like the Vice Chancelor says, these same Western leaders kept turning away from reality on this situation and KSA's role. This needs to be stopped. The terrorist attacks in the past couple of months have disrupted the entire globe, from the US to Pakistan and everything in between!!

I'd go as far as creating a Charter on Combating Terrorism across the globe through the UN. Every nation, religion, etc, should abide by basic fundamental human and religious rights. And anyone forcing their religion on others, or conducting violence (in case of an organization like the ISIS), should be dealt with a Global Anti-Terrorism task force. That way, the entire world has ONE stance, that NO religious violence is accepted and will be tolerated.

US federal is a vivid supporter of Wahabbi Saudi, they will continue to finance whatever Saudi Kingdom. Ordinary American must realize the evil of US federal and rise up against the US government.

 

[nForce]

Have Hinduism changed ??
Have Christanity changed ??
Have judism changed ???

Have you ever been in any Islamic University called Jamia ??

My Brother from another Mother, they are learning quran, hadith, logic over there, the problem is the induction of new subjects like chemistry, physics, maths and computers in there education.

99% of the terrorists are illitrate about Islam.
The 1% who know Islam and doing this are the real culprits we have to capture for our good.

Islam is what it followers are, its simple.

 

[Sipahi]

Islam is what it followers are, its simple.

Yes, exactly and most of the world see less then 1% of the muslims as a whole lot of muslims.

 

[Falcon29]

Islam is what it followers are, its simple.

And Islam's followers are currently a bunch of Jew *** kissers and that should be good for you. When they wake up and destroy the Jewish cult and it's corruption of human beings than that is when you will see genuine Islam. Prophet Muhammad(SAW) was tasked with cleansing the local Arabs from the evil the Jews promoted so he invited them to Islam and slowly cleansed them. But you have to cut the head off the snake, the people promoting Satan trying to ruin our children and make them sex obsessed cultists had to be dealt with. Muhammad(SAW) gave them and their cronies(Zombie worshippers) a chance. Then the bastards tried murdering him so they can resume promoting Satanism and making people hate God. God busted their plan though, it was later named Khaybar.

 

[nForce]

Yes, exactly and most of the world see less then 1% of the muslims as a whole lot of muslims.

Firstly, that 1% / 99% thing is just a figment of imagination, there is no actual data to support that.

Secondly, it does not matter. A normal person, does not judge or differentiate between who is a practising Muslim, by the book, and who is not. So, you may cry out loud at the top of your voice from your roof top and it still will not make any difference. People will look at a terrorist attack and then see some 'Muslim-names' coming in the list of perpetrators. That decides it.
It's all about perception. The sooner you realize that, the better it is for you.

@Falcon29 - For you too.

 

[Sipahi]

Firstly, that 1% / 99% thing is just a figment of imagination, there is no actual data to support that.

Secondly, it does not matter. A normal person, does not judge or differentiate between who is a practising Muslim, by the book, and who is not. So, you may cry out loud at the top of your voice from your roof top and it still will not make any difference. People will look at a terrorist attack and then see some 'Muslim-names' coming in the list of perpetrators. That decides it.
It's all about perception. The sooner you realize that, the better it is for you.

@Falcon29 - For you too.

If we go with the formula of 1% 1 cror 80 lakh terrorists are over there ... I mean really ????

If there are that much terrorists we should save our a$$ and run to the hills.

 

[nForce]

If we go with the formula of 1% 1 cror 80 lakh terrorists are over there ... I mean really ????

If there are that much terrorists we should save our a$$ and run to the hills.

There are active terrorists and there are active supporters and sympathizers and people who simply look the other way. There are people who don't support their actions directly, but will be defensive because of common interests.

Not everybody has to be a gun-totting radical. But, all of them are detrimental to global peace, nonetheless.

 

[Sipahi]

There are active terrorists and there are active supporters and sympathizers and people who simply look the other way. There are people who don't support their actions directly, but will be defensive because of common interests.

Not everybody has to be a gun-totting radical. But, all of them are detrimental to global peace, nonetheless.

I am getting impression that you are talking about RSS and Shiv Sena activities and whole Hindu community protecting them ??

100 croor terrorists

 

[nForce]

I am getting impression that you are talking about RSS and Shiv Sena activities and whole Hindu community protecting them ??

100 croor terrorists

Let's assume, just for the sake of argument that all of them are terrorists. Does that solve this problem ?

That's something you keep repeating to yourself and convincing yourself more than any other to take a temporary solace. Does not change the realities that whenever a suicide bomber is blowing up in a busy market place, the first obvious reaction of people around the globe is, is he Taliban ? al-qaeda ? ISIS ? some other Islamic terrorist organization ?


Like you, I also believe that Islam is a religion of peace. But I'm not a Muslim, you are. So, the onus is upon you to make the image change, convince people about it's reality, not me.

 

[Sipahi]

Let's assume, just for the sake of argument that all of them are terrorists. Does that solve this problem ?

That's something you keep repeating to yourself and convincing yourself more than any other to take a temporary solace. Does not change the realities that whenever a suicide bomber is blowing up in a busy market place, the first obvious reaction of people around the globe is, is he Taliban ? al-qaeda ? ISIS ? some other Islamic terrorist organization ?


Like you, I also believe that Islam is a religion of peace. But I'm not a Muslim, you are. So, the onus is upon you to make the image change, convince people about it's reality, not me.

This preception made by Same BC western who "Invented" them for their interests, once there "lab test" fails and became a "fire" for themselves they are now attacking every where like mad dogs and in the process making more people their enemy.

Let me ask you, if US with his 52 allies attack India and stays there for over 15 years, what the Hindus are going to do ???

 

[nForce]

This preception made by Same BC western who "Invented" them for their interests, once there "lab test" fails and became a "fire" for themselves they are now attacking every where like mad dogs and in the process making more people their enemy.

Let me ask you, if US with his 52 allies attack India and stays there for over 15 years, what the Hindus are going to do ???

Now, you need to look in to the modern history of the region a little bit. Talking about Afghanistan, do you think India was not made the same offer ? That's where planning and long term strategies come into action.
In this World, no country is an "all-weather" friend of another country. There are just mutual interests, common goals and your own agenda. It depends upon how strong you are to stand by your own. India realized this long time back and hence decided to be part of non-aligned movement.

Britain, that tiny island, where there is no place that is further than 120 miles from the sea, that tiny island once ruled half of the World. They used to say sun never sets in the British empire. I admire them for that achievement. They did a lot of right things in order to achieve that feat, probably it all started with Magna-carta.
That's an example of what you can achieve when you start thinking for the sake of greater good and for a greater cause, plan in long term.

US attacked Afghanistan, right.

Are boss, how did US get to gain a foothold there in the very first place ? You had no problem when they were launching U2 spy planes from Peshawar back in the 60s ? You had no problem when they were dumping weapons in Rawalpindi ? You had no problems when they were helping you to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan ? Why ? Because of mutual interests.

Now, whenever you create a ripple, there is reactionary effect. There are ramifications of actions. An experienced leader realizes that, analyses that and then decides his course of action. That's where Pakistani leadership failed. So, question to you, "If you did not have any problem with actions, why are you crying foul, when there are reactions ?". If you could not predict and analyse the aftermaths that may follow, then it's your fault.

US is US, Pacific ocean in one side, Atlantic in another. Peaceful Canadians up north and friendly Mexico down south. They are safe, secured. They did what was best for them, according to their own ground realities. If you got played and fooled, then you can blame nobody but yourself!

 

[Sipahi]

Now, you need to look in to the modern history of the region a little bit. Talking about Afghanistan, do you think India was not made the same offer ? That's where planning and long term strategies come into action.
In this World, no country is an "all-weather" friend of another country. There are just mutual interests, common goals and your own agenda. It depends upon how strong you are to stand by your own. India realized this long time back and hence decided to be part of non-aligned movement.

Britain, that tiny island, where there is no place that is further than 120 miles from the sea, that tiny island once ruled half of the World. They used to say sun never sets in the British empire. I admire them for that achievement. They did a lot of right things in order to achieve that feat, probably it all started with Magna-carta.
That's an example of what you can achieve when you start thinking for the sake of greater good and for a greater cause, plan in long term.

US attacked Afghanistan, right.

Are boss, how did US get to gain a foothold there in the very first place ? You had no problem when they were launching U2 spy planes from Peshawar back in the 60s ? You had no problem when they were dumping weapons in Rawalpindi ? You had no problems when they were helping you to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan ? Why ? Because of mutual interests.

Now, whenever you create a ripple, there is reactionary effect. There are ramifications of actions. An experienced leader realizes that, analyses that and then decides his course of action. That's where Pakistani leadership failed. So, question to you, "If you did not have any problem with actions, why are you crying foul, when there are reactions ?". If you could not predict and analyse the aftermaths that may follow, then it's your fault.

US is US, Pacific ocean in one side, Atlantic in another. Peaceful Canadians up north and friendly Mexico down south. They are safe, secured. They did what was best for them, according to their own ground realities. If you got played and fooled, then you can blame nobody but yourself!

I have every problem with these actions and reactions and due to these "chutiyapas" we are miles behind of our potential.

 

[nForce]

I have every problem with these actions and reactions and due to these "chutiyapas" we are miles behind of our potential.

You realized that, even before asking me that question. I wonder why were you asking then ?
Anyway, it is not important. It's good that you realize it.

 

[Sipahi]

You realized that, even before asking me that question. I wonder why were you asking then ?
Anyway, it is not important. It's good that you realize it.

I have no problem with their dirty politics and interests anywhere in the world.

But when they include the name of specific religion, they are making it complicated.

 

[Al-Taïr]

Oo... Saudi are gonna be broke in 5 years... Its time they get some freedom. ..