What's new

Elections in Japan will have major implications on Pakistan

. .
ok if not asian union india might join SCO then also SCO will be considerablely powered and could be NATO of the east.

India will not be part of SCO because of Pak. China doesn't want to drag Pak into this mess (vs. nato). If India is in, Islamabad will be confronted with a very difficult situation. Besides, the vs. nato part is mostly Russian, not Chinese.
 
.
India will not be part of SCO because of Pak. China doesn't want to drag Pak into this mess (vs. nato). If India is in, Islamabad will be confronted with a very difficult situation. Besides, the vs. nato part is mostly Russian, not Chinese.

please explain difficult situation for pakistan .
I do not think pak will be in difficult situation because-
1)indo-pak relations might improve with time.
2)pak also want to get away from usa and usa's imperialistic presence can only be curbed if pakistan abandon ties with usa and complete asian sco helps it in the way usa does. Aid etc.
 
.
Come on people Japan is still the worlds 2nd largest economy . What they do has serious implications across the board.

No doubt, Japan wants to increase its Military self sufficiency, It finds it self being told what to do by the Americans far too much. especially with North Korea Issue. So it wants to let the US know it will play hard ball if its rigths are not maintaiened.

This political move in reality is not motivated, by china's rise . Nor does it have anything to do with Pakistan and India.

Contrary to popular belief not everything that happens around the world is Motivated by China, India and Pakistan.

Japan only wants to protect its territory, It no longer has the capacity to wage war aggressively Nor does it want to.

LOL
 
.
This political move in reality is not motivated, by china's rise . Nor does it have anything to do with Pakistan and India.

Contrary to popular belief not everything that happens around the world is Motivated by China, India and Pakistan.

no one said that india and pakistan prompted japan to negotiate its ties with usa. We are just discussing the indirect effects of it on geo-politics of south asia.
 
.
please explain difficult situation for pakistan .
I do not think pak will be in difficult situation because-
1)indo-pak relations might improve with time.
2)pak also want to get away from usa and usa's imperialistic presence can only be curbed if pakistan abandon ties with usa and complete asian sco helps it in the way usa does. Aid etc.

Many people say the same thing about BRIC, How ever theses are not military organizations, But forums for economic cooperation.
China will never give India footing on even ground, They keep us out of the UN Security council. to that end. Only way that can even change is if China has a change of government.:what:
And the next election is like never :disagree:

Pakistan and India have changing political view however so it would not be too unreasonable to expect, cordial relations. when territory dispute is settled, which is much more likely to happen. In the coming years.

China on the other hand. will always handle India with the velvet glove over the Iron fist. they have no significant reason to attack but can keep India preoccupied by not backing down. a stalemate in decision making.

India messed up its relations with china a long time ago. China was willing to make concessions back then and we should of accepted.

but now china Claims Arunachal, and since Arunachal is a sate of India.
India will never even acknowledge that claim.
this claim is as ridiculous as Cuba claiming Florida.

its only politics, China is apply pressure on the government with regards to this issue, so that it can keep it distracted. After all people always keep demanding action from government.
At least they dont fire from across border like Pakistan. The dignity to do that at least
 
.
no one said that india and pakistan prompted japan to negotiate its ties with usa. We are just discussing the indirect effects of it on geo-politics of south asia.

The title says elections in Japan to have Major Implications on Pakistan.

May be no one has actually said this in the posts, but title says major implications.

Plus,
Japans only obligation is to it self. and as my points stated in my first post, This is a political move by Japan to get a leg up in relations with the US, it fells are way to one sided.

I dont see any Implications for Asia as a whole with regards to Japan's decision.
 
.
i dont think India will join any union like SCO or NATO..Without joining any union we can milk all the cows at same time(the way we are doing now).
If japan and US cooperation decreases(which is not going to happen), India will get straight benifit because both US and Japan will look at India(because they cant go to china) for cooperation as India is second most powerful military after china in asia..
 
.
i dont think India will join any union like SCO or NATO..Without joining any union we can milk all the cows at same time(the way we are doing now).
If japan and US cooperation decreases(which is not going to happen), India will get straight benifit because both US and Japan will look at India(because they cant go to china) for cooperation as India is second most powerful military after china in asia..

So wrong there buddy. Military wise:

China > Japan > ROK > DPRK > India > Pakistan > Indonesia > Iran :woot:
 
. .
I'm just kidding, it's more like:

China > Japan > India > Pakistan > ROK > DPRK > Indonesia > Iran

ROK = republic of korea (aka south korea)
DPRK = democratic people's republic of korea (aka north korea)

:)
 
.
Most Gen-Y Japanese people I have met have been very pro-West, and Japanese culture has incorporated many Western ideas.

They tend to have a neutral, pleasantly polite attitude towards India and Pakistan.

I don't know how they feel towards China and Korea.

This is not a scientific statement, just my personal experience with meeting Japanese people (18-35 years old) in the West.
 
.
I'm just kidding, it's more like:

China > Japan > India > Pakistan > ROK > DPRK > Indonesia > Iran

ROK = republic of korea (aka south korea)
DPRK = democratic people's republic of korea (aka north korea)

:)

i doubt rating japan above india because of lack of manpower for military in japan and their 1% gdp defence expenditure policy.
 
.
Most Gen-Y Japanese people I have met have been very pro-West, and Japanese culture has incorporated many Western ideas.

They tend to have a neutral, pleasantly polite attitude towards India and Pakistan.

I don't know how they feel towards China and Korea.

This is not a scientific statement, just my personal experience with meeting Japanese people (18-35 years old) in the West.

I can share what I know. Younger people say less than <50 years old have a pleasant view of Chinese and Koreans. In fact, Chinese media and Korean media (aka Korean Wave) is very POPULAR in Japan, just as Anime is popular in China/Korea.

Nearly all intelligent Japanese know their horrible cruel history. But only few admit their mistakes (or rather their parents/ancestors mistakes). It is not because they don't agree, but Oriental Culture apologizing is not easily done.

I have yet to visit japan, but I have talked to and made friends with very MANY Nihonjins. Their media is biased, which explains their cultural/racial "confusion". But (some) do dislike Americans, especially near the south (and of course Okinawans). Also, they have been racially mistreated by Caucasians everywhere they go (though some are still in denial). This is just what you get for being an Honorary White.

Overall, Japanese and Koreans and Chinese people are very similar, too similar (ignoring the minor cultural peculiarities). :smitten:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom