What's new

Egypt's population officially reaches 93 millions: CAPMAS

Of course once a war erupts and people (soldiers) put their uniforms on it does not matter who is on the opposite side of the barrel. I mean Pakistani and Indian Punjabis as well as Pakistani Mujahir's of various ethnic groups have already fought their brethren so to speak. Same story with numerous Arab countries during the few (albeit they occurred) Arab-Arab conflicts. That's evident.

However my question was more about the people to people relations. Does the average Pakistani Punjabi such as you in the UK feel any affinity to the average Indian Punjabi in the UK? I know that there is the divide in religion between Punjabis in Pakistan and Indian Bengalis and Bangladeshi Bengalis but that should not be too much of a hindrance or is that the case?

Of course modern-day ethnic groups are social constructs like everything else (basically), unless people really believe that entire ethnic groups were created by the same nuclear family and their offspring without any outside "assistance". However you have to agree with me that there is a ethnic group called Punjabi, a language called Punjabi (which like all other larger languages has dialects) a Punjabi culture (which like all culture of larger ethnic groups have different layers depending on the historical regions) and that many Punjabis feel some short of kinship one way or another. There is also a genetic affinity (on a larger scale of course like in any ethnic group not everyone shares the same haplogroup or ancestry but you can make enough conclusions to categorize a group like with other ethnic groups/populations in region x or y of the world).

Anyway I have a few Pashtun friends (1 from Waziristan in Pakistan) and the other is from Kandahar (the Pashtun heartland in Afghanistan if I am not wrong) and they feel an affinity to each other but here I have seen Pashtuns from Pakistan (I don't know if they are false-flaggers or trolls) who feel no affinity to any Afghans.

Anyway I guess this is what makes conflicts in South Asia complicated as there are so many layers and due to the very large diversity. Something that I will never understand either is the case system in India. Won't ever understand it. Sure we Arabs have our retarded sectarian lot, largely a recent phenomenon sadly, but they are in general a very small minority and some of them can change, but once a member of a lower caste it seems that it is a death sentence in India. How can Indians tolerate this I won't ever understand. And there is some religious element (if I am not wrong) involved too to make matters worse so it's not as easy to remove. It's been there for millennia as well if I am not wrong.

Anyway good to see you around here. I hope that you are doing well my friend.

Cheers mate, good to see you here too, the more diverse a forum, the broader our perspective becomes.

And yes, you are right in that respect. Most Indian and Pakistani Punjabis do feel a kinship with each other, I am friends with Indian Punjabis too, both Sikhs and Hindus and to say that they are some of the closest friends I have would not be an exaggeration.

Regardless of the issues we have in South Asia, both Indians and Pakistanis usually tend to stick together, especially Indian and Pakistani Punjabis. For example, in school and colleges, the Indian Punjabis had our back and we had theirs. When my Sikh friend was threatened by some random chav, that guy was jumped by both Pakistanis and Indians.

But the relationship, at least in my opinion, is not extended to other Indians. It is indeed relegated to Indian Punjabis. We didn't care about the other Indians much and neither did the Indian Punjabis, as they were mostly from South India and spoke a completely different language and had a different culture and mindset.

And I do feel a kinship with Indian Punjabis, but I would never let it conflict my love for Pakistan though, and we don't expect Indian Punjabis to do the same either. India and Pakistan both have Punjab provinces, so I respect soldiers from both countries and I have never had any issues with this. Rest is politics and mostly the issue of Kashmir that has increased tensions between India and Pakistan, if the Kashmir issue was resolved, Then I am certain that India and Pakistan would have been very close friends, just like the founders of both nations envisioned it.

Are practically all of the Pakistani Mujahir not Muslims? How is it possible to stir up pro-Indian elements among such a populace? From an outsiders view that seems contradictory as most Mujahir, correct me if I am wrong, moved to Pakistan exactly due to them wanting to live in a nation where the majority shared their religion. Also another question, if you don't mind (I don't discuss such personal stuff in person with people or even religion so I will have to do with forums/social media) are most Pakistani Mujahir not from the borderlands of Pakistan (Northern India in general) or are there also many from elsewhere in India such as Deccan which long had and still has a large Muslim population. For instance Hyderabad or Kerala etc.

Haha, not surprised about that. After all you had to prove your loyalty in the eyes of many natives (I believe) so being vocal probably helped. Or more importantly having experienced the unfortunate killings that followed in the wake of the establishment of Pakistan and India.

Anyway what about when Pakistanis and Indians on this forum have heated discussions and racial slurs are involved aimed at Indians? Do you feel personally attacked in such a case as a person with ancestral ties to modern-day India?

I am not a Muhajir. I am ethnically Kashmiri and Awan (west Punjabi) but I do have relatives who are. Racial slurs are nothing new in the subcontinent, I don't personally like them but you can't police the internet as they say.

And it is not to stir pro Indian sentiment, it was more to stir anti Pakistan sentiment and ask India for help in arming an insurgency, but again like I mentioned, the guy who did that has been disowned by the very party he founded, even though before that he was considered almost like a spiritual leader.

And I think the Muhajir community is very diverse, they are however mostly from North and Central India, with a significant minority of them coming from other areas. Also, a lot of the community are actually descended from other groups who came from what is now Pakistan and Afghanistan. For example, I know someone who was related to the royal nawab family in UP, which was founded by Pushtuns but are now of course considered part of the muhajir community.

Mate, South Asia is arguably the most diverse place subcontinent in my opinion. The different ethnic and linguistic groups found here far outnumber any other diverse areas, historically speaking at least.
 
Last edited:
.
Lol Well, that will save parents cost of maternity/giving birth, and that way they can also take their new born from the car park straight back home, hence saving costs and cutting the deficit thus making the country even more strong and stable. :D

Where will they get the birth certificates from? Aldi?
 
.
Bro, if I had 4 wives I did some math considering age of fertility (20-40) for females and I could get 7-8 per wife (not including twins) . You my friend are a guru Master of sexual self control and the ability to keep 4 wives without winding up on the couch, or worse ... :o:

AKA The Love Khan, :azn:
PS: Just need to figure out how to talk to them without sounding like a dork. :man_in_love::ashamed:

I must have a natural instinct towards the traditional women since Yemeni are one of my top 10.

You just have to have one crucial thing in mind. Polygamy is a very expensive business nowadays. Imagine feeding 4 wives at once and a lot of children. You will be bankrupt before you can count to 3. At least in the GCC. Nowadays, those who practice polygamy in KSA, are actually men who marry women in their 30's who never married as unmarried women are considered somewhat of a liability for numerous reasons. Most men are married before they turn 30. If not they are either considered homosexual/asexual or "playboys". Both bad things, lol.

Good. Anyway KSA should be on that list. Great diversity and a "little" Middle East within the Middle East.


Just to be completely clear, if it was not clear enough, I was merely joking. Somewhat.:cheesy:

Cheers mate, good to see you here too, the more diverse a forum, the broader our perspective becomes.

And yes, you are right in that respect. Most Indian and Pakistani Punjabis do feel a kinship with each other, I am friends with Indian Punjabis too, both Sikhs and Hindus and to say that they are some of the closest friends I have would not be an exaggeration.

Regardless of the issues we have in South Asia, both Indians and Pakistanis usually tend to stick together, especially Indian and Pakistani Punjabis. For example, in school and colleges, the Indian Punjabis had our back and we had theirs. When my Sikh friend was threatened by some random chav, that guy was jumped by both Pakistanis and Indians.

But the relationship, at least in my opinion, is not extended to other Indians. It is indeed relegated to Indian Punjabis. We didn't care about the other Indians much and neither did the Indian Punjabis, as they were mostly from South India and spoke a completely different language and had a different culture and mindset.

And I do feel a kinship with Indian Punjabis, but I would never let it conflict my love for Pakistan though, and we don't expect Indian Punjabis to do the same either. India and Pakistan both have Punjab provinces, so I respect soldiers from both countries and I have never had any issues with this. Rest is politics and mostly the issue of Kashmir that has increased tensions between India and Pakistan, if the Kashmir issue was resolved, Then I am certain that India and Pakistan would have been very close friends, just like the founders of both nations envisioned it.



I am not a Muhajir. I am ethnically Kashmiri and Awan (west Punjabi) but I do have relatives who are. Racial slurs are nothing new in the subcontinent, I don't personally like them but you can't police the internet as they say.

And it is not to stir pro Indian sentiment, it was more to stir anti Pakistan sentiment and ask India for help in arming an insurgency, but again like I mentioned, the guy who did that has been disowned by the very party he founded, even though before that he was considered almost like a spiritual leader.

And I think the Muhajir community is very diverse, they are however mostly from North and Central India, with a significant minority of them coming from other areas. Also, a lot of the community are actually descended from other groups who came from what is now Pakistan and Afghanistan. For example, I know someone who was related to the royal nawab family in UP, which was founded by Pushtuns but are now of course considered part of the muhajir community.

Mate, South Asia is arguably the most diverse place subcontinent in my opinion. The different ethnic and linguistic groups found here far outnumber any other diverse areas, historically speaking at least.

Thanks for that long and detailed post bro. Much appreciated and it cleared a few misconceptions.

LOL
@The Sandman

True but this was slightly different killers were neighbors what happened in partition has shaped mentality of both Indians and Pakistanis we hate each other to this day(polls confirm what i say)

When women get sold at a price of cigarette box in certain conflict zones and champions of human rights call bombing of civilians as getting tough this is the correct statement you can think of

Yes there are certain culture specific situations you just cant understand for example i heard of a tribe(Al Haraj i think) in Saudia in which women hide their faces even from their husbands which is strange to me as an outsider but i am sure there is some interesting backstory behind it
Not being critical just slightly curious why they that?

It is still fresh in the memory so this is understandable. Later wars did not help either.

True.

I have heard about that as well. If I recall it is/was practiced by a few clans and tribes in the Al-Kharj region in Najd. I can't answer you why they had/have such traditions. To me it is a very strange thing and if I should guess it might have something to do with a traumatic experience that those 1-2 tribes/clans experienced in the past. For instance warfare and a large number of their women being exploited afterwards. After all this was once common in all countries during wars. Still is to this very day. Afterwards elders/leaders of the tribe might have decided to enforce full veil at all times. Just a theory. Hard to tell. Anyway we are talking about (if they still practice such a thing - I honestly have no idea) a microscopic number of people overall. Less than 0,05% of Saudi Arabia's population. In fact you made me curious so I will try to investigate this closer once I get more time on my hand. I should not even be on PDF right now.

But traditions are a funny thing. In Kuwait where most of the local Kuwaitis are fairly recent arrivals from the same Najd (including the royal family of Kuwait and practically most of the elite) those descendants of Najdi tribes have a much more lax attitude when it comes to headscarfs.

Example:

Ameerah al-Najdi:


More Kuwaiti Najdis:









I can spot a Najdi women from a mile away in the West, lol, by looking at facial features.

More typical attire for the Najdi Saudi Arabians:



:D

Smaller version in traditional attire:


But in KSA/Arab world there is a saying "Najdi piety" so basically Najd was more or less always a traditional region during the Islamic era or at least since the 18th century. Anyway Najd is a quite large region and the degree of conservatism depends on the area of Najd and city. Also have in mind that Najd was never ruled by any non-Arabs ever (in the entire recorded history) and it was also somewhat isolated due to the geography and size. You can compare it to pre-1860 Japan. Today, I will almost claim, that there are more liberals in Najd nowadays than in most other places of KSA.

Anyway I think that we have derailed the thread sufficiently.:-)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Where will they get the birth certificates from? Aldi?
No bro. Lidl offers even more value for money. So a 5 year contract will be offered to LIDL after a competitive bidding process to determine who will bag the contract, thus bringing down costs and reducing government spending, leasjng to a strong and stable leadership/country. :enjoy:
 
.
No bro. Lidl offers even more value for money. So a 5 year contract will be offered to LIDL after a competitive bidding process to determine who will bag the contract, thus bringing down costs and reducing government spending, leasjng to a strong and stable leadership/country. :enjoy:

Mike, why are there so many more teenage pregnancies in the UK compared to other European countries? In fact if I should take a wild guess you guys beat us (KSA and GCC) in this discipline despite us marrying much earlier. I have not looked at any statistics recently but it's just something that I remember reading somewhere/hearing from realiable sources.

Polygamy is not really used nowadays... Per exemple I can tell you that in Morrocco/Algeria and Libya it's 99.9% non-existant... (and in those 3 countries... they are thinking about a law to outlawed it...)
As for Egypt... it's rarely used to...mostly in remote areas...
Even inside GCC countries... it's not widely used either... (it exist, but not as much as Western fantasy may want to believe...)

even if it's not outlawed... it's a rarely used practice... and years after years it's fading away...

True it's not really common nowadays (even less so among the youth) but I don't really understand why so many people have a problem with it and why it is outright outlawed in most of the world. I mean what is the problem? If 2 grown ups decide to marry what is the problem exactly? People in the West and elsewhere marry and remarry all the time, have additional offspring with new wives let alone having affairs while married and even offspring.

Speaking about polygamy this Pakistani Baloch from UAE has 84 children and 17 wives!


That's a bit too much, lol.
 
.

That's a bit too much, lol.

UAE claims to be an Islamic country with sharia-based jurisdiction. So, all the laws of sharia are based primarily on Kur'an and then on Sunnah. Serious question: How is it possible that this man married more than 4 woman at the same time?
 
.
UAE claims to be an Islamic country with sharia-based jurisdiction. So, all the laws of sharia are based primarily on Kur'an and then on Sunnah. Serious question: How is it possible that this man married more than 4 woman at the same time?

I don't know the details or whether his account is even accurate but he can only be married to 4 women at a time. So if he has had 17 wives in total he must have divorced at least 13 of them. There is nothing illegal about that just as long as he is only married to 4 at once. Many Sub-Saharan Africans (where polygamy is more common than non-polygamy) do that in the Sahel region, Western Africa and Eastern Africa.
 
.
I don't know the details or whether his account is even accurate but he can only be married to 4 women at a time. So if he has had 17 wives in total he must have divorced at least 13 of them. There is nothing illegal about that just as long as he is only married to 4 at once. Many Sub-Saharan Africans (where polygamy is more common than non-polygamy) do that in the Sahel region, Western Africa and Eastern Africa.

You answer is the answer to why polygamy could be abused and misused...
A man like him who will divorce to marry another... just for the sake of it...
What will happen to the divorced one? will he able to give him proper compensation for her and her kids? some of those men will play it true and do this part but unfortunely not all of them do... (as for this guy, seems they are still in his home)

The problem with polygamy... it's not the practice that it's problematic..;but what man will do with it... like Alchool... a little is no harm... but since balance is not the best virtue of man/woman... most of the time it's tend to push the limits..and a good part of them will fall into addiction (and their consequences for him and those around him...).

As for Today polygamy AS NO MEANING anymore... Whatever the reason... it's not bc some guys "could" cheat on their wife & therefore jump on a second or third wife to" restraint" himself from that sin... this guy need help..not a human" tool" for his needs...

In the End... we need to be a little less selfish... and always think...what our action could bring to him/her and so on... always...
polygamy was something usefull at a PERIOD of our Human History... like marrying very very young girls ( at their puberty) at that time it was ok... since ppl die very very young and increasing pop was a MUST... as for today it is not necessery neither usefull...
 
Last edited:
.
The good news is that Egypt according to recent IMF reports, got out of its economic crises.. so as economy will be improving (other reports put Egypt as 19th in the strongest global economies by 2030: The strongest economies in 2030, include two Arab countries;
Saudi Arabia: 13th, Egypt : 19th)
Exaggerated population growth will fade away with time and will stabilise around 100 million..
 
Last edited:
.
There is an equation describes that:

Poor countries ( no increase in population = High Birth rate & High Death rate.)

Developing countries ( increase in Population = High Birth rate &Low death rate because of improving Public health systems.

Developed Countries ( No increase in population = low birth rats &a low death rate.)

and you can see all of this in Europian countries.
 
.
I don't know the details or whether his account is even accurate but he can only be married to 4 women at a time. So if he has had 17 wives in total he must have divorced at least 13 of them. There is nothing illegal about that just as long as he is only married to 4 at once. Many Sub-Saharan Africans (where polygamy is more common than non-polygamy) do that in the Sahel region, Western Africa and Eastern Africa.
So it's true that polygamy is more common among sub-saharan Africans?
 
.
Speaking about polygamy this Pakistani Baloch from UAE has 84 children and 17 wives!
His laws atleast in Pakistan have no legal value limit here is 4
Polygamy here is rare more practiced by feudal leaders for a second marriage atleast by law you need permission from first wife,ves

Not really common here and can get a little messy at times :D
It also results in fight between family members of first wife and husband i only know of one case of polygamy in my family and that too was because of infertility
Most marriages here are monogamous also many in our society view it as injustice toward the first wife
 
.
She's not exaggerating. This is a far more serious problem for Egypt than terrorism and concrete steps beyond education on contraception need to be taken. We need to actively limit population growth to a sustainable level.

http://english.ahram.org.eg/NewsCon...-experts-highlight-efforts-to-tackle-Egy.aspx

Sometimes in order to make a point on a very serious matter, you need to go beyond being politically correct or making extreme analogies. She might have even understated it and instead of fighting it like fighting terrorism, she could have even said fight it harder than terrorism. That's even more insensitive, inconsiderate and politically incorrect but it drives the point home which is essential. You can't make soft comments and think all 10 people in the room will hear you, let alone absorb your comment. You need to scream it out loud and use controversial language to get the 10 people's attention and drive the point home. Deal with the consequences later with a quick explanation then ignore and move on.

That article nails it on every level. Illiteracy, ignorance, poverty, education (primarily on this issue), early marriage in reclusive areas of Egypt combined with the lack of advanced and abundant healthcare are all contributing factors.

Implementing laws puts a burden on an already "controversial" justice system and is really not the way to go. Even allowing marriage at 16 years old at the earliest has its issues, for obvious reasons but maybe incentives for young couples can be a way to start. It's not difficult recognizing the problem. Solving it is daunting but better late than never.

A country that needs to fight terrorism, continue to improve the economy and solve the problem of rapid overpopulation has its work cut out.
 
.
Egypt will go bankrupt when the Gulf states can not pump cash and oil for free
 
.
I will do my part once I marry 4 wives at once.

Simply put 7-8 children per family should be the goal if not more. 2 by each wife.

Mabrouk ya Masr!
Lol you sure you're not gonna miss being a bachelor? Because you sure ain't gonna have time for yourself.

For most men one wife is too much, four will be like the end of the world every single day :lol: .

Sometimes in order to make a point on a very serious matter, you need to go beyond being politically correct or making extreme analogies. She might have even understated it and instead of fighting it like fighting terrorism, she could have even said fight it harder than terrorism. That's even more insensitive, inconsiderate and politically incorrect but it drives the point home which is essential. You can't make soft comments and think all 10 people in the room will hear you, let alone absorb your comment. You need to scream it out loud and use controversial language to get the 10 people's attention and drive the point home. Deal with the consequences later with a quick explanation then ignore and move on.

That article nails it on every level. Illiteracy, ignorance, poverty, education (primarily on this issue), early marriage in reclusive areas of Egypt combined with the lack of advanced and abundant healthcare are all contributing factors.

Implementing laws puts a burden on an already "controversial" justice system and is really not the way to go. Even allowing marriage at 16 years old at the earliest has its issues, for obvious reasons but maybe incentives for young couples can be a way to start. It's not difficult recognizing the problem. Solving it is daunting but better late than never.

A country that needs to fight terrorism, continue to improve the economy and solve the problem of rapid overpopulation has its work cut out.
Are you the same Egyptian guy from the Iranian forum?


That's a bit too much, lol.
Ma sha Allah. Good for him. But the way he burst out laughing at that White dude when he said "I only have one wife" as if to imply "that's it?, What a loser!" :lol:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom