Nilgiri
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2015
- Messages
- 24,797
- Reaction score
- 81
- Country
- Location
Is there really, or is it a common misconception? Who really knows whether operating 1 single system is ultimately better than operating a variety? I know conventional wisdom will suggest that the former is a no-brainer, but there are A LOT of arguments to support the latter, especially in Egypt's case as it depends a lot more on foreign purchases than domestic production and has a unique situation as far as past enemies and potentially new ones
It basically has both pros and cons like you said....nothing is "inherent" to one side per se...but it really depends on lot of your organisational structure and specific doctrine (on the roles you assign to the warplanes during peace and for conflict) too....and also your likeliest adversaries threat profile and projection on you.
Like what are the logistical savings and advantages (more thorough integration lets say) by having fewer types of aircraft compared to greater resolution of diversity and capabilities (and as you mention basically the acquisition process realpolitik constraint itself) of having more types of aircraft.
It all very much depends on the specific AF in the end....if the planners and organisation are good and have decent political bureaucracy on the same page, they can make any model work well....by harnessing the strengths and mitigating the weakenesses. This itself is an iterative process that you learn from too (and one hopes gets better at with time)....since you actually often have to deploy and operate assets in the real world to really learn from their nuances and foibles and specific optimisation in the larger framework.
Like why did I mention having a large body of squadrons mitigates the diverse-type issue (lets say logistics + integration is lower than ideal)? Simply because in a conflict, you can deploy them more freely without having to worry as much (in say worst case scenario for a particular "first phase" mission and everything is lost and nothing gained from it) as to what you have left for other missions you would then need to do (in that ladder of events) or what counters you expect the opponent to do that you need to have a response ready to etc.
When you have fewer squadrons (compared to what you forsee to have deterrence and whatever on top) AND they are extremely diverse with the (specific) problems that brings...then simply it restricts what you are willing to do...the overall frontier threshold basically. This will affect the war modelling you can construct...but it can still be done, you just have to be wise and prudent....and like you said you can also use the advantages of the specific diverse types to bear in which way you see best to make up for it.