Egypt is getting a 10 year loan from France to fund which it finds suitable and “comforting”...
I am not saying EAF would deploy Rafales against the PAFs JF-17, I am saying what difference would a Rafale make without a proper BVR missile? in that case even F16 mlu/JF17s armed with AMRAAM/PL15s would make minced meat of the Rafale or any jet confronted without a BVR missile.
None of your points make any sense. How does have a diverse supply of different jets protect against possible sanctions? if anything it further complicates the supply chain during sanctions. If the west sanctions you then your mirages/rafales/f16s are pretty useless.
My question is are EAFs SU-35s/Mig29s armed with a proper BVR missile? even so the reputation for russian bvr missiles is well known since the Russians tend to focus more on their ground control radars/SAM missile systems far more than BVR long range engagements.
My guess is Israel would never even come close to using nukes against Egypt because they would simply destroy the egyptian forces in a conventional battle. That is the reality today. Unfortunately even if all arab militaries combined today to attack Israel I still dont see them winning due to a lack of weapons, indiginous technology, training, lack of coordination, supply chain constraints, lack of innovation, and lack of independant thinking.
There is Turkey, Iran, and Pakistan left.
Turkey has an Ok airforce with hundreds of F16s and a good army with the best drone force of the 3. yet they lack BVR jets, long range cruise/ballistic missile tech, and proper training (erdogan has purged so many officers/pilots).
Iran has a great missile force, proxies, good drone force, and an ok army. Yet at best they are only a nuisance for Israel/America. They lack a airforce, and a strong army. Also they have very limited number of ballistic/cruise missiles that they can actually use against Israel, though their missiles have shown to be very accurate.
Then there is Pakistan, has a strong army, a strong drone force (though not as strong as turkeys), a strong air force, with hundreds of BVR capable jets and dozens of awacs/support aircraft. Pakistan also has a very capable missile force and influential proxies. Pakistan is the only country that could fight toe to toe with Israel and win. Imagine if Israel neighbored the likes of Pakistan/ISI I dont see them lasting more than a few months let alone 7 decades
In many ways Pakistan has held off x10 larger neighbors such as India, the USSR, and now the Americans. That is a combined population of 2+ billion against 200 million. Pakistan has punched more than x10 above its weight consistantly since its creation in 1947 and shown results. What would a measley 8 million israelis do against us?
Unfortunately our geographical presence limits our influence/reach within the greater levant region (Israel/jordan/syria/lebanon). For that we need the arabs to take the lead and unite to provide us a proper land bridge to station our forces in the levant and do chemo on the cancer.
You finished him
www.yenisafak.com
What a big bunch of pack of JOKE.
China has come many generations compared to the past and exceeds Israel in every technological metric. When it comes to semiconductor, chip, 5G, quantum computing, AI, etc... all of which are being included in the latest generation of Chinese military technology.
The fact that Israel itself could make nothing of its LAVI program and instead went for F16s whereby China today has the J10C, and even the J20/J31 speaks volume of their differences.
The point is not to compare Chinese military tech vs Israeli military tech because at the end of the day technology/quality of equipment is only 1 given factor of many in a military battle. There is training, intelligence, battle field survelleince, experience, support, and many other factors that come into consideration.
Technically Egypt still lost the 1971 war. The israelis took back the Sinai and even moved into Egypt proper. The israeli tanks/infantry had Egyptians surrounded and had a straight shot to Cairo. Same thing goes for the Saudi disaster in Yemen today, and Syria's lost attempts at gaining back the Golan Heights. Unfortunately no Arab army has had any victory in the last 100 years.
You cannot compare the situation of Arabs vis via Israel with the situation of Pakistan vis via India. Israel is only 8 million against 500 million arabs. Pakistan is outnumbered by India 8 to 1. When you take into the fact that Pakistan also had to deal with Afghanistan, The Soviets, and the US. then that number easily goes to 12-1 against Pakistan.
Israel has been able to consoldiate itself as a state and even a major power for 7 decades due to the fact it is neighbored by 500 million arabs. Had Israel neighbored 200 million Pakistanis it would not exist as a state for even a few days.
Arabs recall Pakistani pilots’ gallantry in 1967 war | Middle East
Pakistan Air Force shot down 3 Israeli planes in 6-day war that ended with Israel’s victory
I am sure there is major communication problem here with YOU?
Pakistan?!! Not before upgrading its obsolete air force with the Egyptian 3rd hand Mirage V, then it can have a chance by real world actions not just empty words, wet dreams, and hallucinations.I am not saying EAF would deploy Rafales against the PAFs JF-17, I am saying what difference would a Rafale make without a proper BVR missile? in that case even F16 mlu/JF17s armed with AMRAAM/PL15s would make minced meat of the Rafale or any jet confronted without a BVR missile.
None of your points make any sense. How does have a diverse supply of different jets protect against possible sanctions? if anything it further complicates the supply chain during sanctions. If the west sanctions you then your mirages/rafales/f16s are pretty useless.
My question is are EAFs SU-35s/Mig29s armed with a proper BVR missile? even so the reputation for russian bvr missiles is well known since the Russians tend to focus more on their ground control radars/SAM missile systems far more than BVR long range engagements.
My guess is Israel would never even come close to using nukes against Egypt because they would simply destroy the egyptian forces in a conventional battle. That is the reality today. Unfortunately even if all arab militaries combined today to attack Israel I still dont see them winning due to a lack of weapons, indiginous technology, training, lack of coordination, supply chain constraints, lack of innovation, and lack of independant thinking.
There is Turkey, Iran, and Pakistan left.
Turkey has an Ok airforce with hundreds of F16s and a good army with the best drone force of the 3. yet they lack BVR jets, long range cruise/ballistic missile tech, and proper training (erdogan has purged so many officers/pilots).
Iran has a great missile force, proxies, good drone force, and an ok army. Yet at best they are only a nuisance for Israel/America. They lack a airforce, and a strong army. Also they have very limited number of ballistic/cruise missiles that they can actually use against Israel, though their missiles have shown to be very accurate.
Then there is Pakistan, has a strong army, a strong drone force (though not as strong as turkeys), a strong air force, with hundreds of BVR capable jets and dozens of awacs/support aircraft. Pakistan also has a very capable missile force and influential proxies. Pakistan is the only country that could fight toe to toe with Israel and win. Imagine if Israel neighbored the likes of Pakistan/ISI I dont see them lasting more than a few months let alone 7 decades
In many ways Pakistan has held off x10 larger neighbors such as India, the USSR, and now the Americans. That is a combined population of 2+ billion against 200 million. Pakistan has punched more than x10 above its weight consistantly since its creation in 1947 and shown results. What would a measley 8 million israelis do against us?
Unfortunately our geographical presence limits our influence/reach within the greater levant region (Israel/jordan/syria/lebanon). For that we need the arabs to take the lead and unite to provide us a proper land bridge to station our forces in the levant and do chemo on the cancer.
I hope the «mighty» EAF performs better than it did in 1967 and 1973.
Look I'm not trying to get under your throat or anything.
