What's new

Educate women and their community will prosper. Deny them education and the world will suffer

Jaanbaz

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
May 7, 2013
Messages
10,382
Reaction score
10
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
We both grew up in Australia, where our education provided strong foundations to meet our potential as female leaders. Millions of girls throughout the world deserve the same chance

e58767690d091ffcfbb8050902f899dc.jpeg

Afghan refugees and internally displaced Pakistani girls attend their classes at a makeshift school.Photograph: Muhammed Muheisen/AP

“If you educate a man, you educate one person. If you educate a woman, you educate a nation”. It’s an often heard quote in development circles, and the eve of the opening of the 69th session of the UN General Assembly is a good time to pause and consider what it really means.

We know that educating boys and girls, men and women, is morally right. But educating girls and women is especially effective because when we educate them, the benefits are felt throughout the whole community. It’s a magic multiplier in the development equation.

The positive relationship between female education and overall development outcomes is well established. However, it is the dynamic that underpins that correlation which merits drawing out.

An educated woman is better able to educate her own children who, in turn, will be more likely to receive school education themselves. The family will likely be healthier, with a lower prospect of infant mortality and better maternal nutrition, including while pregnant and nursing.

An educated woman’s household is more likely to prosper as a result of a higher overall income. Just one extra year of secondary education can increase a woman’s income as much as 25% a year. By participating in the labour market, an educated woman helps boost economic productivity, leading to greater wealth for her community as well.

It is an attractive proposition: invest in women and girls, and the benefits flow not only to them but everyone around them, too. Sadly, the reverse is also true. Deny girls and women education and the whole community suffers, not just them as individuals.


efc047c3c8baedbd6b457ad9e035f849.jpeg

Rwanda Girls in Rwanda squat on the floor to do their lessons at the Gisenyi prefecture.Photograph: Chris Noble/Corbis

Tragically, over 60m girls remain out of school around the world. Even where significant progress has been made to get girls into school, they are often deprived strong groundings in the education essentials of literacy and numeracy. This has a negative compound effect, making it hard for them to progress beyond primary school even where such opportunities are available.

Not only the human but also the economic cost of this educational deprivation of girls and women is huge, and the cost to individual economies can be as high as $1bn a year. Plan’s Children in Focus report puts the global economic price of failing to educate girls to the same level as boys at $92bn each year. To put this in perspective, that figure falls just short of the combined annual overseas aid budgets of the world’s developed countries.

The world cannot afford this any longer. We must commit to giving girls an education, girls who are not presently receiving one, and also commit to give those girls who are receiving one, the opportunity to progress to and complete their secondary education.

Getting girls enrolled in and completing primary school is the threshold task, followed by the even greater challenge of ensuring girls’ secondary education. Women with a sound education will not only earn more themselves, they will contribute more to their household and national economies. They will also be less likely to fall victim to the scourge of human trafficking and forced child marriages, and be better able to protect themselves from contracting preventable diseases like HIV.

Under the aegis of the Clinton Global Initiative, Girls CHARGE was launched with the purpose of raising the global ambition for girls’ education. Spearheaded by the Center for Universal Education at the Brookings Institution and Hillary Clinton’s No Ceilings Initiative, these issues will be addressed directly, by raising global ambitions for girls to attend school and complete secondary education, acquiring the skills they need for work and life.

We both grew up in Australia. Education provided strong foundations for both of us to stride different stages with confidence: one of us becoming Australia’s first female prime minister, the other a leading player in some of the major theatre and film productions of the world. Without a great education, these achievements would simply have not been possible. Millions of girls throughout the world are today denied the opportunity to meet their full potential. This is not a situation any thinking or feeling person can stand by and tolerate.

As the 69th Session of the United Nations General Assembly begins, we urge the world’s leaders to back this major push to tackle the unfinished business of giving girls a great education. Those of us who have benefitted so much from our educations should feel powerfully obliged to do so. It’s what every girl and every community deserves, and it is in our hands to deliver.



Julia Gillard, Australia’s 27th prime minister, is a distinguished fellow at the Brookings Institution Center for Universal Education. Cate Blanchett is a veteran actress of stage and screen and former co-artistic director and co-CEO of Sydney Theatre Company


Educate women and their community will prosper. Deny them education and the world will suffer | Julia Gillard and Cate Blanchett | Comment is free | The Guardian
 
.
This article reminds me of chikbok kidnappings. Boko Haram kidnapped school girls whom it believes should not be educated instead should be used as cooks or s*x slaves.
 
.
This article reminds me of chikbok kidnappings. Boko Haram kidnapped school girls whom it believes should not be educated instead should be used as cooks or s*x slaves.

Or?
 
. . . .
I don't have anything against the main message of the article in fact I fully support it. However to insinuate the educating women is somehow more beneficial to society than educating men is frankly sexist and ultimately false. Both the parents help educate their kids, not just the mother. Both can contribute in the same or different ways. Throughout my childhood in Pakistan, across my cousins and friends, I saw BOTH parents contributing equally to the education of the child. I know this is not the main message of the article, however it loses its credibility somewhat if it makes such sexist claims. Though these days no one seems to care if someone makes sexist claims against the male gender so it probably won't make a difference.
 
.
The lead article speaks well and truly of the facts.
@SMC; you are not wrong, neither are you entirely correct. Men's (or Father's) roles in the educational process can be shifting, to the point of being sporadic and intermittent. The contribution of Men in the education of their children esp in the younger years (ca. upto toddler-hood) is substantially less than of Women/Mothers. Partly because Nature has ordained it so and partly because of practical reasons. That cannot be changed. Finally, Men tend to get more easily "contaminated" attitudinally than women. Therefore there tends to be a kind of "coloration" in the inputs that they impart to their children, relative to women. In contrast, women's input are more affected by ignorance than this coloration.
Let us remember that Education consists largely of A S K: viz. Attitudes, Skills and Knowledge. Of these three component areas: Attitudes (or the imbibing thereof) needs to (and does in fact) start early; immediately after Birth.
Who but Women, or Mothers can do it!

n.b. @levina ji; abv for you too........ :)
 
.
n.b. @levina ji; abv for you too........ :)
abv??
alcohol by volume??

I agree to what you had to say that in early stages of childhood kids learn more from their mothers than their fathers.It would not be fair to say that father's can not teach children or don't contribute to it.
But somebody has missed the point completely.
@SMC understand that a literate mother would motivate her children to study ,would be help them in their studies and most importantly would adopt a healthier lifestyle than an illiterate mother. A educated lady would be able to act adroitly!!
 
Last edited:
.
abv??
alcohol by volume??

I agree to what you had to say that in early stages of childhood learn more from their mothers than their fathers.It would not be fair to say that father's can not teach children or don't contribute to it.
But somebody has missed the point completely.
@SMC understand that a literate mother would motivate her children to study ,would be help them in their studies and most importantly would adopt a healthier lifestyle than an illiterate mother. A educated lady would be able to act adroitly!!


Nope. abv= above, years of writing signals/msgs leads to this phenomenon, while I am totally out of synch with present-day SMS-speak ! :)
I did write on the basis of being a Man and a Father and a Son; all in one.........
 
.
Nope. abv= above, years of writing signals/msgs leads to this phenomenon, while I am totally out of synch with present-day SMS-speak ! :)
I did write on the basis of being a Man and a Father and a Son; all in one.........
Because you sound like an old man i would take your words seriously from now. :P

Kidding! :lol:
 
.
Because you sound like an old man i would take your words seriously from now. :P

Kidding! :lol:

OhOh; I'm old enough to Tango and young enough to Rock n'Roll. But I'll let you into a secret: even my wife does not take me seriously........neither should you.
Those who take me seriously......do so at their own peril; like the mods out here. :lol:
 
.
Because you sound like an old man i would take your words seriously from now. :P

Kidding! :lol:

also a level of nutrition for pregnant mothers as well. Stunting, physically and intellectually is a big problem in India and other poverty stricken nations.
 
.
Should we even have discussion about this? Is Pakistan not a nation where a strong woman candidate ran for elections in the fifties? Although she lost by a very small margin, Fatima Jinnah paved the way for a young Muslim woman, Benazir Bhutto, to become the first woman Prime Minster of a Muslim nation. The late Agha Khan Senior, one of the founding fathers of Pakistan, once said, “If you have two children, a boy and a girl, but only have enough money to educate one of them. Educate the girl!” The reason is simple, because she becomes a teacher not only for her children but the whole community.

Nations cannot prosper if education is not available for all. In Pakistan USAID spends millions every year on education for all. We understand the importance of education and how it empowers the younger generations. Pakistan is a young country with a younger population, and half of them are girls. There is no denying that all should have access to education specially girls.


Abdul Quddus
DET - U.S. Central Command
United States Central Command - Urdu - MacDill Air Force Base, FL - Government Organization | Facebook
 
.
The lead article speaks well and truly of the facts.
@SMC; you are not wrong, neither are you entirely correct. Men's (or Father's) roles in the educational process can be shifting, to the point of being sporadic and intermittent. The contribution of Men in the education of their children esp in the younger years (ca. upto toddler-hood) is substantially less than of Women/Mothers. Partly because Nature has ordained it so and partly because of practical reasons. That cannot be changed. Finally, Men tend to get more easily "contaminated" attitudinally than women. Therefore there tends to be a kind of "coloration" in the inputs that they impart to their children, relative to women. In contrast, women's input are more affected by ignorance than this coloration.
Let us remember that Education consists largely of A S K: viz. Attitudes, Skills and Knowledge. Of these three component areas: Attitudes (or the imbibing thereof) needs to (and does in fact) start early; immediately after Birth.
Who but Women, or Mothers can do it!

n.b. @levina ji; abv for you too........ :)
abv??
alcohol by volume??

I agree to what you had to say that in early stages of childhood kids learn more from their mothers than their fathers.It would not be fair to say that father's can not teach children or don't contribute to it.
But somebody has missed the point completely.
@SMC understand that a literate mother would motivate her children to study ,would be help them in their studies and most importantly would adopt a healthier lifestyle than an illiterate mother. A educated lady would be able to act adroitly!!

Even if we believe this premise, if more and more women go out and get jobs, which the very same movement supports (again, I fully support that as well), then women's impact will be no more than men's in their children's lives.

What I don't like is the overemphasis of women's role in their children's education and the under-emphasis of men's role. While stating the following, they literally claim that women are solely responsible for education children while men play no role in that:
“If you educate a man, you educate one person. If you educate a woman, you educate a nation”

To which I say:

a) The children still have to attend school regardless, so the parents only HELP educate their children.
b) "If you educate a man, you educate one person" implies men take no part in educating their children, while in reality they can take as much part as the mother or even more.

This is again not the main point of this thread, but it makes me really angry when we have such blatant sexism against men and everyone just applauds along with it, many men included.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom