Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
sexism??Even if we believe this premise, if more and more women go out and get jobs, which the very same movement supports (again, I fully support that as well), then women's impact will be no more than men's in their children's lives.
What I don't like is the overemphasis of women's role in their children's education and the under-emphasis of men's role. While stating the following, they literally claim that women are solely responsible for education children while men play no role in that:
To which I say:
a) The children still have to attend school regardless, so the parents only HELP educate their children.
b) "If you educate a man, you educate one person" implies men take no part in educating their children, while in reality they can take as much part as the mother or even more.
This is again not the main point of this thread, but it makes me really angry when we have such blatant sexism against men and everyone just applauds along with it, many men included.
TRUE!!Hi,
Educating women is not enough----these women need to be put to work. Women are very intelligent and capable of doing what they want to----but if you do not put their intellect to work---and only make them a house wife-----you are doing great damage to the family----.
A literate capable women without a job outside of the house may turn to PURE EVIL----. They want to burn their energies and when they don't see their intellect being challenged at home----they would create situations in the household and family that may cause major issues.
Education is not enough----we need something that builds CHARACTER---education alone don't bring character---.
TRUE!!satyavachan prabhu
Thats exactly the reason i am in favor of working women
It's also false and incredibly sexist.You educate a man, you educate a man. You educate a woman, you educate a generation. --- Brigham Young
Cannot say better than this
sexism??
No,I dont think so.At times things 're a lil exaggerated but the gist of it is gals should also be sent to school along with boys.
And about the men teaching children at home, well I think in majority of the houses its the moms who take up that responsibility simply because men 're usually busy with their jobs.I can not speak for the rest of the world but atleast for South-Asia.
Here nobody is underestimating what a man does for his family.
It's also false and incredibly sexist.
It is very much sexist. It is clear from the quotation that men's contribution to their children's education is not being considered at all. If you said something similar about women (such as women making no financial contributions in their children's lives) then everyone would be all over you. But since its sexist about men everyone applauds along.
Also, my experience in Pakistan where I lived all my childhood was different than yours. Both my parents were equally involved in helping educate me. And this was not just me - most my friends and cousins shared the same experience.
Try to see the context of the quote. Still in many in rural villages only boys are sent to schools not girls and it was shown by the research that if girls from those villages go to schools and get some job, they encourage more families to send their daughters to the school. So yes, it is always good to have education for the girls.
And I have nothing against educating girls, in fact it should very much be mandatory to educate every human being. However, such quotes promote one gender over the cost of the gender, and put down men in general, and completely overlook their contribution to their children's education.
Get over the habit of finding sexism where there's none.It is very much sexist. It is clear from the quotation that men's contribution to their children's education is not being considered at all. If you said something similar about women (such as women making no financial contributions in their children's lives) then everyone would be all over you. But since its sexist about men everyone applauds along.
I had similar upbringing.SMC said:Also, my experience in Pakistan where I lived all my childhood was different than yours. Both my parents were equally involved in helping educate me. And this was not just me - most my friends and cousins shared the same experience.
Get over the habit of finding sexism where there's none.
Had men not treated women as downtrodden then this day would not have come where we have to exaggerate things to make it sound sexist.
I had similar upbringing.
The difference is women get forced to do things on day to day basis. From her studies to marriage to even the dress she wears, is dictated by someone else. Would you deny that??There's obvious sexism here. I've already explained how. To deny it is being in denial and being sexist yourself. Don't get your second point - men have been treated as bad as women historically, although in different ways. Women were never forced to go to war and get themselves killed.
The difference is women get forced to do things on day to day basis. From her studies to marriage to even the dress she wears, is dictated by someone else. Would you deny that??
Men have more freedom than women.And this is a fact!