E-3 insufficient for timely detection of J-20: Pacific Air Forces chief

[DF41]

well it was a failed attempt to educate the uninformed...

here is a technical term you can google "entomological radar"
you're welcome...

 

[Beast]

In the same manner does your KJ-2000 and KJ-500 are able to detect F-22/F-35 in timely manner???

Of course, F-35 and F-22 stealth are much inferior. But even our AWACS have problem detect our J-20.

Then you better invade now before that gap period passes.

Biden begged us not to invade now to spare his embarrassment and we agree as a sight of respect for this senile poor old man.

And what have you 'debunked'? Our F-15, F-16, F-22, F-35, and B-2 are AESA-ed. The coming NGAD fighter and B-21 will also be AESA-ed. The only airborne platform that is not AESA-ed (yet) is our hardest working AWACS. So that made your China the 'world leader' in AESA technology? Anyone who actually WORK in technology would laugh at your argument.


Did your China used Top Gun movie clip to show off the PLAAF?


I doubt you can explain why the mosquito detection is valid for 'stealth' detection. The only thing you guys know about radar is how to spell the word.

The only one who laugh at my arguement are those US lackey frog in the well...

Did China Mars rover landed using any Hollywood clip to fake the landing? Tell me, genius?

 

[White and Green with M/S]

Of course, F-35 and F-22 stealth are much inferior. But even our AWACS have problem detect our J-20.

LOL, F-22/F-35 has a better stealth than your Mighty J-20, your Mighty J-20 has a CANARDS and ventral fins which gives to extra surface to AWACS/RADAR, your J-20 is much inferior to F-22/F-35 in terms of stealth

 

[gambit]

Did China Mars rover landed using any Hollywood clip to fake the landing? Tell me, genius?

Probably did.

 

[White and Green with M/S]

Probably did.

Ignor @Beast sir he is just a blind ultra national person and nothing else

 

[Elernal]

And what have you 'debunked'? Our F-15, F-16, F-22, F-35, and B-2 are AESA-ed. The coming NGAD fighter and B-21 will also be AESA-ed. The only airborne platform that is not AESA-ed (yet) is our hardest working AWACS. So that made your China the 'world leader' in AESA technology? Anyone who actually WORK in technology would laugh at your argument.


Did your China used Top Gun movie clip to show off the PLAAF?


I doubt you can explain why the mosquito detection is valid for 'stealth' detection. The only thing you guys know about radar is how to spell the word.

Enough, your argument with him is pointless, since Wilsbach has said there is such a problem, you don't need to cite these update plans that have not yet been implemented, the US AESA technology is still the world's first class which is no doubt, we all know the US made TR emitter units are much more powerful, but the current reality is that the US military is clearly lagging behind major rivals like China in the application of this field, not only airborne but also naval , there is no need to refute

 

[Beast]

Probably did.

Poor thing. That is the only consolation you can get. Rise of China is real and so as the China Mars feat. Sougrape in your soul, I can sense it.

All you can do is smear China achievement to make you feel better. US shall invest more money on scientific funding real those evil propaganda that do nothing but degrade US credibility.

Enough, your argument with him is pointless, since Wilsbach has said there is such a problem, you don't need to cite these update plans that have not yet been implemented, the US AESA technology is still the world's first class which is no doubt, we all know the US made TR emitter units are much more powerful, but the current reality is that the US military is clearly lagging behind major rivals like China in the application of this field, not only airborne but also naval , there is no need to refute

LOL... Another self delusion who is just another frog in the well. You havent seen the real world and rise of China. Still live in the 70s where you think only western world dominate most of the thing.

At least the US Air Chief is humble enough to admit deficiency unlike some fanboy who all they do is do some chest beating.

US backstab France and have some pride as French and stop siding with them. US will be ready to slaughter French like Lamb for its own benefit. They are not your friend.

 

[gambit]

Enough, your argument with him is pointless, since Wilsbach has said there is such a problem, you don't need to cite these update plans that have not yet been implemented, the US AESA technology is still the world's first class which is no doubt, we all know the US made TR emitter units are much more powerful, but the current reality is that the US military is clearly lagging behind major rivals like China in the application of this field, not only airborne but also naval , there is no need to refute

The US is a GLOBAL superpower while China is a regional power. Because we are global, our military tends to be overworked because of our global interests, not just our own but also of our allies. Some PLAN ships have some slightly newer technologies than ours. And in this debate, there is only one Chinese airborne platform that deployed the AESA technology -- the AWACS platform. So how does this make US behind China?

 

[Beast]

Ignor @Beast sir he is just a blind ultra national person and nothing else

As if your are no some blind US nationalist who think only good things can come from USA.

And in this debate, there is only one Chinese airborne platform that deployed the AESA technology -- the AWACS platform. So how does this make US behind China?

See.. Another frog in the well. J-20, J-16 , JF-17 and J-10C are all AESA equipped airborne platform. And we even export J-10C and JF-17 with AESA. There is no way to make these up.

 

[White and Green with M/S]

As if your are no some blind US nationalist who think only good things can come from USA.

I believe in facts/physics and real science, you're believing in Chinese Physics, which unreal, and do tell me who has more experience to build/develop and manufacture Stealth jets you or USA???

 

[Beast]

I believe in facts/physics and real science, you're believing in Chinese Physics, which unreal, and do tell me who has more experience to develop and manufacture Stealth jets???

What physics and science do you believe when China land with Mars rover is real. China export ASEA equipped fighter like JF-17 and J-10C to Pakistan. You think all these are propaganda and fake news? And these article of admission is by US chief himself. Not that I pointed a gun at his head and make him say all these words.

More like you cannot accept rise of China and China technology advancement.

 

[White and Green with M/S]

What physics and science do you believe when China land with Mars rover is real. China export ASEA equipped fighter like JF-17 and J-10C to Pakistan. You think all these are propaganda and fake news? And these article of admission is by US chief himself. Not that I pointed a gun at his head and make him say all these words.

More like you cannot accept rise of China and China technology advancement.

you're deluded person nothing else, i am not declining this fact that you have the tech but who is the creator of stealth tech tell me that

And your CANARD equipped J-20 has slightly more RCS with comparison to F-22/F-35, CANARD AND VENTRAL FINS are give EXTRA SURFACE to RADAR/AWACS in comparison to TRADITIONAL STEALTH DESIGNS like F-22/F35/F-117.

as for your rants same goes to your AWACS to detect F-22/F-35 in a timely manner

 

[Beast]

you're deluded person nothing else, i am not declining this fact that you have the tech but who is the creator of stealth tech tell me that

And your CANARD equipped J-20 has slightly more RCS with comparison to F-22/F-35, CANARD AND VENTRAL FINS are give EXTRA SURFACE to RADAR/AWACS in comparison to TRADITIONAL STEALTH DESIGNS like F-22/F35/F-117.

as for your rants same goes to your AWACS to detect F-22/F-35 in a timely manner

LOL.. What does it matter of creator or not? By your theory, China shall be mother of all gunpowder technology.

But you will be selective find stance to suit your delusion. US is creator of stealth doesnt mean they will dominate forever. You want to talk about canard as unstealthy? I can find fault with US F-22 raptor non DSI inlet which contribute to RCS increase and F-35 uneven belly which result more RCS. But I know US fanboy will avoid all these well known factor to suit their own agenda.

 

[gambit]

What physics and science do you believe when China land with Mars rover is real. China export ASEA equipped fighter like JF-17 and J-10C to Pakistan. You think all these are propaganda and fake news? And these article of admission is by US chief himself. Not that I pointed a gun at his head and make him say all these words.

More like you cannot accept rise of China and China technology advancement.

Our B-52 fleet is older than your PLAAF/PLAN pilots, but does that mean the B-52 is not a threat? The problem with you is that you suffer from the typical 'shiny new toy' syndrome where you think that just because something is new it must be better. If our AWACS have difficulties detecting the J-20, then by the same argument China's AWACS would have equal if not greater difficulties detecting our 'stealth' platforms.

E-3 AWACS (Sentry) Airborne Warning and Control System, US

The E-3 airborne warning and control system (AWACS) is built by Boeing Defense & Space Group. The first E-3 entered service with the USAF in March 1977.

www.airforce-technology.com

The improvement in sensitivity against small and stealthy targets is achieved through the installation of a new surveillance radar computer (SRC) to replace the digital Doppler processor and radar correlator, and the translation of the associated software into ADA language. RSIP installation was completed on the Nato (17) and UK (seven) aircraft in 2000, on France (four) in 2006 and on the 33 USAF E-3 AWACS in April 2005.​

I will ask you this...Is there a radar tactic to detect a low radar observable body based on its aspect angle in respect to the seeking radar?

But you will be selective find stance to suit your delusion. US is creator of stealth doesnt mean they will dominate forever. You want to talk about canard as unstealthy? I can find fault with US F-22 raptor non DSI inlet which contribute to RCS increase and F-35 uneven belly which result more RCS. But I know US fanboy will avoid all these well known factor to suit their own agenda.

That argument died a long time ago. The J-20's canards are greater radiators in terms of protrusions inside the beam.

 

[White and Green with M/S]

LOL.. What does it matter of creator or not? By your theory, China shall be mother of all gunpowder technology.

But you will be selective find stance to suit your delusion. US is creator of stealth doesnt mean they will dominate forever. You want to talk about canard as unstealthy? I can find fault with US F-22 raptor non DSI inlet which contribute to RCS increase and F-35 uneven belly which result more RCS. But I know US fanboy will avoid all these well known factor to suit their own agenda.

LOL The creator means USA has more experience than China in term of Stealth jet and still has that advantage, you're quite new in field and DSI is not the only tech to hide engine fan blade to radar their quite few which can hide engine fan blade to radar, S AIR INTAKE IS ONE OF THEM,

So why you assume that Designer of F-35 neglect belly of F-35 and design it unstealthily

You're fanboy iam not