What's new

DRDO: Intercontinental ballistic missiles well within reach

Uh-oh!

Lost our tech support job, have we?

It's a sad way to learn that even faithful guys aren't indispensable.

In America, we distinguish American vs Asian Indians by casino vs tech support Indians.casino indian= American Indians. In eastern part of my state, when we use the term Indian, it means casino Indians. At where I live, Indian men's tech support indians
 
.
Actually, Indian seeks global hegemony. But since their neighbors diss them, they do not bs too much at this point. however, once they develop something that can reach an inch of US territory, they would talk about replacing the US as the premier global power. Do not trust these techsupport Indians as they are power hungry and extremely racist
no its not indias who are doing anti satelite test .its not indians who are attacking afghanista,pakistan,iraq,its not indians who are threatening every country of SCS....you give answer to all those question you will get answer who has global hegemony designs.
 
.
no its not indias who are doing anti satelite test .its not indians who are attacking afghanista,pakistan,iraq,its not indians who are threatening every country of SCS....you give answer to all those question you will get answer who has global hegemony designs.

US has no global hegemony design. US has the capability so no need for such design. It's many Indians who crave for such capability. Some even for the purpose of revenge on all these centuries of humiliation under british rule by desiring white servants.
 
. .
US has no global hegemony design. US has the capability so no need for such design. It's many Indians who crave for such capability. Some even for the purpose of revenge on all these centuries of humiliation under british rule by desiring white servants.

So by your reasoning any country trying to improve its capability is now trying to get one over the west. If that was the case then China also falls in that category. India for the most part has kept a pretty limited missile/defense capability. Even the missile developed now are only for the current threat level. If India really wanted revenge against the west then it would have created a more longer range missile and would have done more spending on military hardware. Yet every year the Indian army return a lot of its budget back to the government because they don't use, which goes to shows the restrains the army and military has shown.
 
.
India needs a missile that has a range long enough to attack from the southermost tip of India to the every city in China..evcen the farthest one. If that missile with that range falls into the category of intercontinental missile..then be it. we need those..and then may be we can stop.
 
.
India needs a missile that has a range long enough to attack from the southermost tip of India to the every city in China..evcen the farthest one. If that missile with that range falls into the category of intercontinental missile..then be it. we need those..and then may be we can stop.

I think Agni-5 already give that range, however, we need second strike capability and MRIV now.
 
.
I think Agni-5 already give that range, however, we need second strike capability and MRIV now.

are you sure ?? I think Agni's range is enough to attack any city in China but nit from anywhere in India. I am not talking about the officially declared range of A5 not what it can achieve by reducing warheads and stuff.
 
.
Hellloo everyone,:yahoo:
am a new member here,just joined this forum although i am a regular visitor here and i like the discussions over such issues.I guess i cant keep myself away from these talks anyway
ON THE TOPIC-
i think what agni-5 provides India is the capability of a semi intercontinental ballistic missile which can target the northeast region of the big country like china.But yeah india should develop an fully capable ICBM of a range of 10,000km which can be launched from middle or the southernmost region of our country given the fact that if a war broke out(which i never really wanted) the northern part of our country will be the first target of Chinese army.
And also i would like to mention that i have seen in news our defense minister or a mem. of parliament after the test of agni-5 claiming that India has the capability of developing an ballistic with a range of 7,500km or more :woot: but we would develop it untill it is needed :hitwall:
 
.
are you sure ?? I think Agni's range is enough to attack any city in China but nit from anywhere in India. I am not talking about the officially declared range of A5 not what it can achieve by reducing warheads and stuff.


My mistake, it doesn't seem so.
 
. .
are you sure ?? I think Agni's range is enough to attack any city in China but nit from anywhere in India. I am not talking about the officially declared range of A5 not what it can achieve by reducing warheads and stuff.

The distance between the southern most point in India and the farthest point in China is almost 7000km .....

So an 8000 km missile and it's SLBM version will give an India an assured second strike capability to strike any part of China......
 
.
The distance between the southern most point in India and the farthest point in China is almost 7000km .....

So an 8000 km missile and it's SLBM version will give an India an assured second strike capability to strike any part of China......

India already has that capability with A5. India is already covered the range from 7000 to 10000 KMs with A5 though it wont disclose it ever.

(India is not stupid to increase range of its Missiles by 1000 or 1500 Km only every time it makes a new missile. Like A3 - 4000 and A5 - 5500. The things told to world is just meant to fool the world)

But India next going to build 13000-16000 KM missile in A6. A6 will cover the whole world fired from any point of India.
 
.
.
Back
Top Bottom