What's new

Drama directed by CIA? The blinded girl in 2019 HK riot found in Taiwan, with two intact eyes.

Status
Not open for further replies.
NYT made two assertions in which they did not provide proof. 1. She lost an eye. 2. The projectile that hit her was launched by police.

That the doctor said is bone fracture and a cut. Not loosing an eye. Also the rioters were firing from high powered slingshots and it could have very likely she was hit by one of those.

Then why is the CIA being blamed in the title? Where is the proof?
 
.
Then why is the CIA being blamed in the title? Where is the proof?
You see the question mark? The title didn't assert the CIA was behind this. Please learn to read.
 
.
lol chill dude, I don't care about you or what you believe. Like I said, not my problem :cheers:
You care enough to start hurling made up accusations. 😑

Whatever dude, just don't waste my time anymore. When I say I don't want to talk about something, then leave me the hell alone.
 
. .
No doubt she was injured, but not on her eye. The "broken eye" was a disinformation campaign to stir up hatred against the HK police by some insidious people and foreign power. If you have read the two articles, then you will have more understanding on what is going on in HK internal struggle.


After seeing her with 2 very beautiful eyes, I doubt everything and anything said by her and her gang of rioter thugs in full pay of NED and NED proxies. :pleasantry::pleasantry::pleasantry:



:D :D:D

I still hope to know what ketchup did she used and did the HongKong judges in pay of UK and NED and 5Eyes knew the brand of ketchup when they sealed her medical records from being given to the police .
 
.
You see the question mark? The title didn't assert the CIA was behind this. Please learn to read.

BS. The insinuation is clearly DISHONEST. Why not say MOSSAD or MI5? Or KGB, for that matter?
 
.
BS. The insinuation is clearly DISHONEST. Why not say MOSSAD or MI5? Or KGB, for that matter?
Now the burden of proof is on you to proof they were dishonest and the CIA was not behind this. Don't assert bs you can't proof.
 
.
Now the burden of proof is on you to proof they were dishonest and the CIA was not behind this. Don't assert bs you can't proof.

There is no proof because the insinuation is incorrect. And dishonest. If you understand what insinuation means, that is. Chinese rial!
 
.
There is no proof because the insinuation is incorrect. And dishonest. If you understand what insinuation means, that is. Chinese rial!
It was a reasonable educated guess. Wither it was an insinuation or not you have no way of knowing. Only the author does.
 
.
1622142800063.png
 
.
Remember how she fought like crazy to prevent the police from getting her medical reports from Hospital?

The UK appointed judges all supported her and refused her medical files from going to the Police.

Those UK appointed judges knew and lying through their wigs and teeth.

They all should dance
There are UK judges in Hong Kong still?
 
.
It was a reasonable educated guess. Wither it was an insinuation or not you have no way of knowing. Only the author does.

More BS. There is nothing reasonable or educated about the dishonesty you and your kind are allowed to spout endlessly on PDF without any proof whatsoever.
 
.
More BS. There is nothing reasonable or educated about the dishonesty you and your kind are allowed to spout endlessly on PDF without any proof whatsoever.
Your funny haha :pop:
 
.
Your funny haha :pop:

But you are just a lying web bot.

For all its economic success. China will never achieve its potential unless its allows its people the personal freedoms that they yearn for, which is anathema to the central control by the communist party.
 
. .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom