Dr. Zakir Naik booked by NIA in ‘love jihad’ case involving top Bangladesh politician’s son

[EasyNow]

Opindia writers should try to abduct a mouse from London to BD, let alone a person and see how idiotic that notion is.

When people get into relationships in university in the rest of the world its called 'dating' only Indians call it love jihad. Do you really think, with all the girls in the UK, this rich MPs son has thrown away all his options to do love jihad on this one girl?

And the whole idea of love jihad is ridiculous. On the one hand Muslims are accused of being insular and on the other hand they are accused of taking non Muslim women into their world.

If Bollywood should teach Indians anything it's that Muslim parents are even stricter than Hindu ones. Why would they want their child to bring an ex Hindu into their home? It was not easy for this boy to marry the girl he chose, i guarantee you that.

As for this girl being held captive - that is based on her father's testimony. He will obviously paint the worst possible picture.

In reality, if she is unhappy, it's because married life in BD is not working for her - religion had nothing to do with it

 

[Michael Corleone]

Zakir Naik is definitely a nutcase but nobody forced his daughter in a first world country to convert to Islam, marry and then get kidnapped from to bd. Besides there’s a reason love jihad is popular now, Hindus don’t have rafiques
@Bilal9 @DalalErMaNodi

 

[Bengal71]

Zakir Naik is similar to Anwar Al Awlaki, the founded of Al Qaeda.

You are again a despicable liar and know nothing about Al Qaeda. Al Qaeda was founded by Osama Bin Laden, Al Awlaki is not a founder.

I normally have a decent discussion with people but you are constantly and deliberately lying. You need to be reported.

@waz @The Eagle @Slav Defence

Please look at this guy's posts, he is constantly lying with blatant falsehood.

 

[Michael Corleone]

Opindia writers should try to abduct a mouse from London to BD, let alone a person and see how idiotic that notion is.

When people get into relationships in university in the rest of the world its called 'dating' only Indians call it love jihad. Do you really think, with all the girls in the UK, this rich MPs son has thrown away all his options to do love jihad on this one girl?

And the whole idea of love jihad is ridiculous. On the one hand Muslims are accused of being insular and on the other hand they are accused of taking non Muslim women into their world.

If Bollywood should teach Indians anything it's that Muslim parents are even stricter than Hindu ones. Why would they want their child to bring an ex Hindu into their home? It was not easy for this boy to marry the girl he chose, i guarantee you that.

As for this girl being held captive - that is based on her father's testimony. He will obviously paint the worst possible picture.

In reality, if she is unhappy, it's because married life in BD is not working for her - religion had nothing to do with it

It’s love jihad as long as it’s a hindu girl dating a Muslim guy... they would have no qualms with dating a Muslim girl, in fact that’s their fantasy

 

[EasyNow]

It’s love jihad as long as it’s a hindu girl dating a Muslim guy... they would have no qualms with dating a Muslim girl, in fact that’s their fantasy

Sadly, like so many of Indian men's little dreams, that is out of their reach too

 

[VikingRaider]

Zakir Nayek is not radical preacher . And it's not necessary to post Indian garbage in Bangladesh defence forum always.

 

[VikingRaider]

This Zakir Naik guy is a Radical Hate preacher. I have watched hundreds of his videos where he openly supported Al Qaeda and Taliban. He also supports destruction of Hindu and Buddhist temples and believes that minorities living in muslim countries should not be allowed any rights. In Malaysia, this guy tried to provoke the Chinese and Indians and suffered a backlash.

Post some videos that back your claim.

 

[DalalErMaNodi]

Zakir Naik is definitely a nutcase but nobody forced his daughter in a first world country to convert to Islam, marry and then get kidnapped from to bd. Besides there’s a reason love jihad is popular now, Hindus don’t have rafiques
@Bilal9 @DalalErMaNodi

Subramanians are not Rafiques, so that's hardly a suprise.

Subramanians all have one 3g data SIM for a dozen people and they all take turns with 3gp videos.


Too cheap to splurge at shonagachi, also too cheap to afford 4g or watch anything over 240p, that too taking turns with the same phone.

 

[Jugger]

Oh really. Please post the "hundreds of his videos" you watched where he said these things. There are many Muslims in this website and we have watched many of his videos. Provide proof if you are truthful.

Here take one of his ridiculous videos.
Dhimmi, jaziya and becoming vassal to Muslims rulers..!!!!!! LOL !!!! That too in the 21st century.

somebody tell this nutjob that we are living in the 21st century and not in the dark ages.

I will give you an example, it was very common for Roman Catholics to kill Protestants by the thousands in the past, but can you kill like that today..???? Absolutely no.!!

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

Here take one of his ridiculous videos.
Dhimmi, jaziya and becoming vassal to Muslims rulers..!!!!!! LOL !!!! That too in the 21st century.

somebody tell this nutjob that we are living in the 21st century and not in the dark ages.

I will give you an example, it was very common for Roman Catholics to kill Protestants by the thousands in the past, but can you kill like that today..???? Absolutely no.!!

GoP doesnt build mosques, than why should tax papers money and land worth billions be used to build a temple in a city with probably less than a 1000 hindus when there are already few temples around?
Same money should be spent on welfare of poor.
If hindus have issues they can build one with their own money, just like muslims.
I dont see any hate in the video.
Also a hindu indian should be the last one to talk bout Pak.

 

[DalalErMaNodi]

Here take one of his ridiculous videos.
Dhimmi, jaziya and becoming vassal to Muslims rulers..!!!!!! LOL !!!! That too in the 21st century.

somebody tell this nutjob that we are living in the 21st century and not in the dark ages.

I will give you an example, it was very common for Roman Catholics to kill Protestants by the thousands in the past, but can you kill like that today..???? Absolutely no.!!

I'm sorry, I maybe mistaken, but are lynchings a 21st century norm ?


One would think that, since India is firmly in the 21st century, seeing as they are cracking down on people like Zakir Naik.


Although, I suppose bovine lives matter more than lowly human ones, gosh, I must be living in the dark ages, what was I thinking valuing humans lives over cows.


Now, if you'll excuse me, I need to engage in some soul searching, It's only apt you see, as I have been living life backwards by adhering to archaic ideals.

 

[Jugger]

GoP doesnt build mosques, than why should tax papers money and land worth billions be used to build a temple in a city with probably less than a 1000 hindus when there are already few temples around?
Same money should be spent on welfare of poor.
If hindus have issues they can build one with their own money, just like muslims.
I dont see any hate in the video.
Also a hindu indian should be the last one to talk bout Pak.

Have you listened to his video fully..??? Have you..??
This is the problem with maximum posters here, don’t don’t read or listen to the post fully..!
He has clearly mentioned that is not even permissible for even a non Muslim to contribute for building his place of worship.
And if such a construction has occurred then the Muslims have every right to destroy such a place of worship.

 

[Jugger]

I'm sorry, I maybe mistaken, but are lynchings a 21st century norm ?


One would think that, since India is firmly in the 21st century, seeing as they are cracking down on people like Zakir Naik.


Although, I suppose bovine lives matter more than lowly human ones, gosh, I must be living in the dark ages, what was I thinking valuing humans lives over cows.


Now, if you'll excuse me, I need to engage in some soul searching, It's only apt you see, as I have been living life backwards by adhering to archaic ideals.

What are you talking about man ..!! Or are you acting over smart.???

lynching is a crime in India, people are behind bars because of it.
You can come to Goa and Kerala to eat as much beef and pork as you wish. It is completely legal and every restaurant has both dishes.

whereas what Mr Zakir is saying is that by law a non Muslims can’t build their place of worship in a Muslim country and by law such a construction can be destroyed.
Constitutional oppression of minorities should stop in such nations.

 

[DalalErMaNodi]

What are you talking about man ..!! Or are you acting over smart.???

lynching is a crime in India, people are behind bars because of it.
You can come to Goa and Kerala to eat as much beef and pork as you wish. It is completely legal and every restaurant has both dishes.

whereas what Mr Zakir is saying is that by law a non Muslims can’t build their place of worship in a Muslim country and by law such a construction can be destroyed.
Constitutional oppression of minorities should stop in such nations.

Oh, grow up!

"Over-smart" is a word Indians use when they get challenged with facts.


No point taking this discussion any further, since you indulge in such childish name calling, and seriously, grow up!


Indians from the India of today, are hardly in a position to lecture others on human rights and freedoms, If anything you lot need to be more.... Human.

 

[Bengal71]

Here take one of his ridiculous videos.
Dhimmi, jaziya and becoming vassal to Muslims rulers..!!!!!! LOL !!!! That too in the 21st century.

somebody tell this nutjob that we are living in the 21st century and not in the dark ages.

I will give you an example, it was very common for Roman Catholics to kill Protestants by the thousands in the past, but can you kill like that today..???? Absolutely no.!!

Yeah, what's radical or extremist about it? The law of Shariah in a Islamic state is that money of Muslims can't be used to build a place of worship of non-Muslims? He is explaining the law here. What's radical about it?

And that's not what I was discussing with that lying cheater. He was claiming he saw hundreds of video where Zakir Naik endorsed Taliban and Al Qaeda. The liar also claimed Al Awlaki founded the Al Qaeda.

If you are to respond on his behalf, stick to the topic.