WAR-rior
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2010
- Messages
- 4,860
- Reaction score
- -15
- Country
- Location
Dude. Why think so much? What suggestions u put forward is infact the recipe for communalism. Afterall, Communalism gets feeded and strengthened when position of power becomes mere victim to what religion he comes from. After all, there is some logic when sahafis and daanishmand people say, Religion and State ought to be kept away. Now for that to happan, religion of an individual shud never be the criteria.While that is true, it depends on the inhibitions being put forward. That somehow Muslims in Kashmir will suffer under a Hindu BJP CM. This has political misconstruing at its core, but there is historical precedent for it.. and at the same time against it.
The Indian state under the Raj and after it has had some non-muslim leadership in smaller positions who played instrumental roles in providing betterment to the Muslim communities..
At the same time there are clear historical examples where Hindus(and Muslims in a vice-versa example) in positions of power have played a biased role against the Majority or minority Muslim population. It is then therefore usually best to take a leader from the major section of the community at the top and then intersperse it with those from the minority communities in the positions directly beneath them... or as the other alternative.. appoint a Hindu CM but ensure that the majority of his staff and cabinet are Muslim and hence help keep his decisions balanced.
Now as far as Indian democracy is concerned, lets the people decide who they want in power. Problems occur when some go against the desires of common voters for fulfilling personal benefits and propaganda.