Areesh
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2010
- Messages
- 45,157
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
71 is gone but Indian victory remains.
Still at best a face saver for now.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
71 is gone but Indian victory remains.
They are in a different location, not there at the place where the incident happened.
Home Minister said that had India remained a weak country, the Doklam standoff won't have had a resolution.
New Delhi: Home Minister Rajnath Singh on Sunday said that the Doklam standoff with China was resolved because of India's rise as a world power. Addressing a rally in Bengaluru's Palace Grounds, he said that India's image and prestige on the world stage has changed for the better in recent years.
India and China resolved the Doklam standoff after forces of both countries went eyeball-to-eyeball at the border for 71 days. Tensions rose when China began constructing a road in the plateu at Sikkim-Bhutan-Tibet tri-junction. Both Bhutan and India said that Chinese construction was illegal. The standoff which began in mid-June only ended late August with troops from both countries backing down. Rajnath on Sunday said that India showed it is a mature nation throughout the standoff. "India has become a world power. Had India remained weak, the Doklam conflict would have never been sorted," he said.
Since the standoff ended, both India and China have reaffirmed their determination to resolve disputes peacefully and work towards greater diplomatic and economic co-operation. The Chinese envoy in India recently said both India and China ' must dance together on the path of development.'
Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Sunday visited Nathu La on the Indo-China border and interacted with soldiers from both countries. In a tweet from the defence ministry, she was also seen teaching Chinese soldiers the meaning of Namaste. This even as China once again came out strongly to defend its position in Doklam - claiming once again
that it is part of its territory.
http://zeenews.india.com/india/doklam-issue-got-resolved-because-india-is-a-world-power-rajnath-2048680.html
Itna Jhoot
@war&peace @Areesh @Narendra Trump
A new scientifically approved method for stress relief/depression, just listen to indian politicians, and u will enjoy for lifetime.
Point is Qaid post was first occupied by SSG , they were dislodged and article by good brigadier accept it.I can't believe this. You just referenced something you have not read yourself, that is poor beyond belief!
Look from the article itself;
On April 13, 1984 a small force of the Indian Army occupied the Bilafond La pass. Four days later, another small force occupied the Sia La pass. Both passes,
This affirms what I said there was no Pakistani army presence there.
As the article goes on, this is written.
The first Pakistani reaction to the occupation of the passes came on April 24/25, 1984
Please tell me what are you trying to do here. The Pakistani reaction came much later, but yet you're still claiming that Pakistan had troops there, even with the evidence staring you in the face.
The next attempt came years after, as detailed by the article.
In early April 1987, another attempt was made by the Pakistan Army to gain a foothold on the Saltoro ridgeline.
Point is Qaid post was first occupied by SSG , they were dislodged and article by good brigadier accept it.
There are more than 20 dams at various stages of construction at Tibetan plateau to generate hydroelectricity for China and it is feared that they will reduce the flow of water in Brahmaputra River. It will compound the already tenuous water situation in the downstream region directly affect the agricultural activities of Assam’s plain in India and most of the parts of Bangladesh.
Unlike India, we are not lying experts. Just as you camouflage the victim here. Then the elite of India clamored for "2.5 line war" (before the Doklam incident).Chinese thought they could scare away India like they did in SCS,where even USA did not intervene,but were surprised when Indian soldiers came into Bhutan to stop construction.Anyways,it was worth a gamble for the Chinese.
Well as long as we occupied Doklam, who cares.Unlike India, we are not lying experts. Just as you camouflage the victim here. Then the elite of India clamored for "2.5 line war" (before the Doklam incident).
And we understand about India. Unfortunately, India does not understand China. . . More do not understand myself.
Think about a country only 10 days of weapons stockpiles. Can not even make basic weapons independently. It talks about "2.5 line war"